THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF ENSEMBLE-BASED WEATHER FORECASTS

Yuejian Zhu
Search for other papers by Yuejian Zhu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zoltan Toth
Search for other papers by Zoltan Toth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard Wobus
Search for other papers by Richard Wobus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David Richardson
Search for other papers by David Richardson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Kenneth Mylne
Search for other papers by Kenneth Mylne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

The potential economic benefit associated with the use of an ensemble of forecasts versus an equivalent or higher-resolution control forecast is discussed. Neither forecast systems are postprocessed, except a simple calibration that is applied to make them reliable. A simple decision-making model is used where all potential users of weather forecasts are characterized by the ratio between the cost of their action to prevent weather-related damages, and the loss that they incur in case they do not protect their operations. It is shown that the ensemble forecast system can be used by a much wider range of users. Furthermore, for many, and for beyond 4-day lead time for all users, the ensemble provides greater potential economic benefit than a control forecast, even if the latter is run at higher horizontal resolution. It is argued that the added benefits derive from 1) the fact that the ensemble provides a more detailed forecast probability distribution, allowing the users to tailor their weather forecast–related actions to their particular cost–loss situation, and 2) the ensemble's ability to differentiate between high-and low-predictability cases. While single forecasts can statistically be supplemented by more detailed probability distributions, it is not clear whether with more sophisticated postprocessing they can identify more and less predictable forecast cases as successfully as ensembles do.

SAIC at National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, Maryland

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, United Kingdom

Met Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Yuejian Zhu, NCEP, Environmental Modeling Center, 5200 Auth Rd., Room 207, Camp Springs, MD 20746, E-mail: Yuejian.Zhu@noaa.gov

The potential economic benefit associated with the use of an ensemble of forecasts versus an equivalent or higher-resolution control forecast is discussed. Neither forecast systems are postprocessed, except a simple calibration that is applied to make them reliable. A simple decision-making model is used where all potential users of weather forecasts are characterized by the ratio between the cost of their action to prevent weather-related damages, and the loss that they incur in case they do not protect their operations. It is shown that the ensemble forecast system can be used by a much wider range of users. Furthermore, for many, and for beyond 4-day lead time for all users, the ensemble provides greater potential economic benefit than a control forecast, even if the latter is run at higher horizontal resolution. It is argued that the added benefits derive from 1) the fact that the ensemble provides a more detailed forecast probability distribution, allowing the users to tailor their weather forecast–related actions to their particular cost–loss situation, and 2) the ensemble's ability to differentiate between high-and low-predictability cases. While single forecasts can statistically be supplemented by more detailed probability distributions, it is not clear whether with more sophisticated postprocessing they can identify more and less predictable forecast cases as successfully as ensembles do.

SAIC at National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, Maryland

European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, United Kingdom

Met Office, Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Yuejian Zhu, NCEP, Environmental Modeling Center, 5200 Auth Rd., Room 207, Camp Springs, MD 20746, E-mail: Yuejian.Zhu@noaa.gov
Save