All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 128 21 1
PDF Downloads 24 7 0

How Can We Advance Our Weather and Climate Models as a Community?

Robert E. Dickinson
Search for other papers by Robert E. Dickinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephen E. Zebiak
Search for other papers by Stephen E. Zebiak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jeffrey L. Anderson
Search for other papers by Jeffrey L. Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maurice L. Blackmon
Search for other papers by Maurice L. Blackmon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Cecelia De Luca
Search for other papers by Cecelia De Luca in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Timothy F. Hogan
Search for other papers by Timothy F. Hogan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mark Iredell
Search for other papers by Mark Iredell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ming Ji
Search for other papers by Ming Ji in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ricky B. Rood
Search for other papers by Ricky B. Rood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Max J. Suarez
Search for other papers by Max J. Suarez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Karl E. Taylor
Search for other papers by Karl E. Taylor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

A common modeling infrastructure ad hoc working group evolved from an NSF/NCEP workshop in 1998, in recognition of the need for the climate and weather modeling communities to develop a more organized approach to building the software that underlies modeling and data analyses. With its significant investment of pro bono time, the working group made the first steps in this direction. It suggested standards for model data and model physics and explored the concept of a modeling software framework. An overall software infrastructure would facilitate separation of the scientific and computational aspects of comprehensive models. Consequently, it would allow otherwise isolated scientists to effectively contribute to core U.S. modeling activities, and would provide a larger market to computational scientists and computer vendors, hence encouraging their support.

School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

International Research Institute for Climate Prediction, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York

NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Naval Research Laboratory, Marine Meteorological Division, Monterey, California

NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Boulder, Colorado

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Robert E. Dickinson, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 221 Bobby Dodd Way, Atlanta, GA 30332-0340, E-mail: robted@eas.gatech.edu

A common modeling infrastructure ad hoc working group evolved from an NSF/NCEP workshop in 1998, in recognition of the need for the climate and weather modeling communities to develop a more organized approach to building the software that underlies modeling and data analyses. With its significant investment of pro bono time, the working group made the first steps in this direction. It suggested standards for model data and model physics and explored the concept of a modeling software framework. An overall software infrastructure would facilitate separation of the scientific and computational aspects of comprehensive models. Consequently, it would allow otherwise isolated scientists to effectively contribute to core U.S. modeling activities, and would provide a larger market to computational scientists and computer vendors, hence encouraging their support.

School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

International Research Institute for Climate Prediction, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York

NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Naval Research Laboratory, Marine Meteorological Division, Monterey, California

NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Boulder, Colorado

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Robert E. Dickinson, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 221 Bobby Dodd Way, Atlanta, GA 30332-0340, E-mail: robted@eas.gatech.edu
Save