The Arm Program's Water Vapor Intensive Observation Periods

Overview, Initial Accomplishments, and Future Challenges

H. E. Revercomb
Search for other papers by H. E. Revercomb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. D. Turner
Search for other papers by D. D. Turner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. C. Tobin
Search for other papers by D. C. Tobin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. O. Knuteson
Search for other papers by R. O. Knuteson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W. F. Feltz
Search for other papers by W. F. Feltz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Barnard
Search for other papers by J. Barnard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Bösenberg
Search for other papers by J. Bösenberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Clough
Search for other papers by S. Clough in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Cook
Search for other papers by D. Cook in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Ferrare
Search for other papers by R. Ferrare in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Goldsmith
Search for other papers by J. Goldsmith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Gutman
Search for other papers by S. Gutman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Halthore
Search for other papers by R. Halthore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Lesht
Search for other papers by B. Lesht in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Liljegren
Search for other papers by J. Liljegren in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
H. Linné
Search for other papers by H. Linné in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Michalsky
Search for other papers by J. Michalsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
V. Morris
Search for other papers by V. Morris in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W. Porch
Search for other papers by W. Porch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Richardson
Search for other papers by S. Richardson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Schmid
Search for other papers by B. Schmid in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Splitt
Search for other papers by M. Splitt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. Van Hove
Search for other papers by T. Van Hove in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Westwater
Search for other papers by E. Westwater in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
D. Whiteman
Search for other papers by D. Whiteman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

A series of water vapor intensive observation periods (WVIOPs) were conducted at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) site in Oklahoma between 1996 and 2000. The goals of these WVIOPs are to characterize the accuracy of the operational water vapor observations and to develop techniques to improve the accuracy of these measurements.

The initial focus of these experiments was on the lower atmosphere, for which the goal is an absolute accuracy of better than 2% in total column water vapor, corresponding to ~1 W m−2 of infrared radiation at the surface. To complement the operational water vapor instruments during the WVIOPs, additional instrumentation including a scanning Raman lidar, microwave radiometers, chilled-mirror hygrometers, a differential absorption lidar, and ground-based solar radiometers were deployed at the ARM site. The unique datasets from the 1996, 1997, and 1999 experiments have led to many results, including the discovery and characterization of a large (> 25%) sonde-to-sonde variability in the water vapor profiles from Vaisala RS-80H radiosondes that acts like a height-independent calibration factor error. However, the microwave observations provide a stable reference that can be used to remove a large part of the sonde-to-sonde calibration variability. In situ capacitive water vapor sensors demonstrated agreement within 2% of chilled-mirror hygrometers at the surface and on an instrumented tower. Water vapor profiles retrieved from two Raman lidars, which have both been calibrated to the ARM microwave radiometer, showed agreement to within 5% for all altitudes below 8 km during two WVIOPs. The mean agreement of the total precipitable water vapor from different techniques has converged significantly from early analysis that originally showed differences up to 15%. Retrievals of total precipitable water vapor (PWV) from the ARM microwave radiometer are now found to be only 3% moister than PWV derived from new GPS results, and about 2% drier than the mean of radiosonde data after a recently defined sonde dry-bias correction is applied. Raman lidar profiles calibrated using tower-mounted chilled-mirror hygrometers confirm the expected sensitivity of microwave radiometer data to water vapor changes, but it is drier than the microwave radiometer (MWR) by 0.95 mm for all PWV amounts. However, observations from different collocated microwave radiometers have shown larger differences than expected and attempts to resolve the remaining inconsistencies (in both calibration and forward modeling) are continuing.

The paper concludes by outlining the objectives of the recent 2000 WVIOP and the ARM–First International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) Regional Experiment (FIRE) Water Vapor Experiment (AFWEX), the latter of which switched the focus to characterizing upper-tropospheric humidity measurements.

University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany

Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts

Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois

NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia

Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California

NOAA/Forecast Systems Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico

Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, and University of Oklahoma, Norman Oklahoma

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

University Cooperation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

*On leave from Climate Dynamics Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: David D. Turner, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706, E-mail: dturner@ssec.wisc.edu

A series of water vapor intensive observation periods (WVIOPs) were conducted at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) site in Oklahoma between 1996 and 2000. The goals of these WVIOPs are to characterize the accuracy of the operational water vapor observations and to develop techniques to improve the accuracy of these measurements.

The initial focus of these experiments was on the lower atmosphere, for which the goal is an absolute accuracy of better than 2% in total column water vapor, corresponding to ~1 W m−2 of infrared radiation at the surface. To complement the operational water vapor instruments during the WVIOPs, additional instrumentation including a scanning Raman lidar, microwave radiometers, chilled-mirror hygrometers, a differential absorption lidar, and ground-based solar radiometers were deployed at the ARM site. The unique datasets from the 1996, 1997, and 1999 experiments have led to many results, including the discovery and characterization of a large (> 25%) sonde-to-sonde variability in the water vapor profiles from Vaisala RS-80H radiosondes that acts like a height-independent calibration factor error. However, the microwave observations provide a stable reference that can be used to remove a large part of the sonde-to-sonde calibration variability. In situ capacitive water vapor sensors demonstrated agreement within 2% of chilled-mirror hygrometers at the surface and on an instrumented tower. Water vapor profiles retrieved from two Raman lidars, which have both been calibrated to the ARM microwave radiometer, showed agreement to within 5% for all altitudes below 8 km during two WVIOPs. The mean agreement of the total precipitable water vapor from different techniques has converged significantly from early analysis that originally showed differences up to 15%. Retrievals of total precipitable water vapor (PWV) from the ARM microwave radiometer are now found to be only 3% moister than PWV derived from new GPS results, and about 2% drier than the mean of radiosonde data after a recently defined sonde dry-bias correction is applied. Raman lidar profiles calibrated using tower-mounted chilled-mirror hygrometers confirm the expected sensitivity of microwave radiometer data to water vapor changes, but it is drier than the microwave radiometer (MWR) by 0.95 mm for all PWV amounts. However, observations from different collocated microwave radiometers have shown larger differences than expected and attempts to resolve the remaining inconsistencies (in both calibration and forward modeling) are continuing.

The paper concludes by outlining the objectives of the recent 2000 WVIOP and the ARM–First International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) Regional Experiment (FIRE) Water Vapor Experiment (AFWEX), the latter of which switched the focus to characterizing upper-tropospheric humidity measurements.

University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany

Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts

Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois

NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia

Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California

NOAA/Forecast Systems Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico

Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, and University of Oklahoma, Norman Oklahoma

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

University Cooperation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

*On leave from Climate Dynamics Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: David D. Turner, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706, E-mail: dturner@ssec.wisc.edu
Save