All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 321 232 65
PDF Downloads 113 36 1

Transferability Intercomparison: An Opportunity for New Insight on the Global Water Cycle and Energy Budget

E. S. Takle
Search for other papers by E. S. Takle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Roads
Search for other papers by J. Roads in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Rockel
Search for other papers by B. Rockel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W. J. Gutowski Jr.
Search for other papers by W. J. Gutowski Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. W. Arritt
Search for other papers by R. W. Arritt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I. Meinke
Search for other papers by I. Meinke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. G. Jones
Search for other papers by C. G. Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
A. Zadra
Search for other papers by A. Zadra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

A new approach, called transferability intercomparisons, is described for advancing both understanding and modeling of the global water cycle and energy budget. Under this approach, individual regional climate models perform simulations with all modeling parameters and parameterizations held constant over a specific period on several prescribed domains representing different climatic regions. The transferability framework goes beyond previous regional climate model intercomparisons to provide a global method for testing and improving model parameterizations by constraining the simulations within analyzed boundaries for several domains. Transferability intercomparisons expose the limits of our current regional modeling capacity by examining model accuracy on a wide range of climate conditions and realizations. Intercomparison of these individual model experiments provides a means for evaluating strengths and weaknesses of models outside their “home domains” (domain of development and testing). Reference sites that are conducting coordinated measurements under the continental-scale experiments under the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Hydrometeorology Panel provide data for evaluation of model abilities to simulate specific features of the water and energy cycles. A systematic intercomparison across models and domains more clearly exposes collective biases in the modeling process. By isolating particular regions and processes, regional model transferability intercomparisons can more effectively explore the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of predictability. A general improvement of model ability to simulate diverse climates will provide more confidence that models used for future climate scenarios might be able to simulate conditions on a particular domain that are beyond the range of previously observed climates.

Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, Lajolla, California

GKSS Research Centre, Geesthacht, Germany

Universite du Quebec, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Meteorological Service of Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

A supplement to this article is available online (DOI: 10.1I75/BAMS-88-3Takle)

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Eugene S. Takle, 3010 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, E-mail: gstakle@iastate.edu

A new approach, called transferability intercomparisons, is described for advancing both understanding and modeling of the global water cycle and energy budget. Under this approach, individual regional climate models perform simulations with all modeling parameters and parameterizations held constant over a specific period on several prescribed domains representing different climatic regions. The transferability framework goes beyond previous regional climate model intercomparisons to provide a global method for testing and improving model parameterizations by constraining the simulations within analyzed boundaries for several domains. Transferability intercomparisons expose the limits of our current regional modeling capacity by examining model accuracy on a wide range of climate conditions and realizations. Intercomparison of these individual model experiments provides a means for evaluating strengths and weaknesses of models outside their “home domains” (domain of development and testing). Reference sites that are conducting coordinated measurements under the continental-scale experiments under the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Hydrometeorology Panel provide data for evaluation of model abilities to simulate specific features of the water and energy cycles. A systematic intercomparison across models and domains more clearly exposes collective biases in the modeling process. By isolating particular regions and processes, regional model transferability intercomparisons can more effectively explore the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of predictability. A general improvement of model ability to simulate diverse climates will provide more confidence that models used for future climate scenarios might be able to simulate conditions on a particular domain that are beyond the range of previously observed climates.

Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, Lajolla, California

GKSS Research Centre, Geesthacht, Germany

Universite du Quebec, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Meteorological Service of Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

A supplement to this article is available online (DOI: 10.1I75/BAMS-88-3Takle)

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Eugene S. Takle, 3010 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, E-mail: gstakle@iastate.edu
Save