Working at the Boundary: Facilitating Interdisciplinarity in Climate Change Adaptation Research

Amanda H. Lynch
Search for other papers by Amanda H. Lynch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lee Tryhorn
Search for other papers by Lee Tryhorn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Rebecca Abramson
Search for other papers by Rebecca Abramson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Efforts are being made to develop new paradigms for climate change adaptation policy at both the national and the international levels. However, progress in vulnerability and adaptation research has not been matched by advancement on practical policy initiatives. The complexity of the challenge to develop methods and means to support adaptation to climate change necessitates a diversity of approaches. This diversity is healthy, and yet it is possible to define some key characteristics and tools that can promote practical outcomes. In this paper, some methodologies that have proved successful are reviewed. These include a mapping of contextual circumstances, an appreciation for multiple perspectives, and the importance of a “boundary object” in forging strong interactions among project participants. Further, a toolkit of approaches for natural scientists is presented. This toolkit can be used to organize work in collaboration with stakeholders and other participants and can help overcome barriers to a meaningful contribution to the policy process. Fundamentally, this challenge will require approaches that are more grounded in meaning, narration, and reflection.

School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Amanda H. Lynch, School of Geography and Environmental Science, P.O. Box IIA, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia, E-mail: amanda.lynch@arts.monash.edu.au

Efforts are being made to develop new paradigms for climate change adaptation policy at both the national and the international levels. However, progress in vulnerability and adaptation research has not been matched by advancement on practical policy initiatives. The complexity of the challenge to develop methods and means to support adaptation to climate change necessitates a diversity of approaches. This diversity is healthy, and yet it is possible to define some key characteristics and tools that can promote practical outcomes. In this paper, some methodologies that have proved successful are reviewed. These include a mapping of contextual circumstances, an appreciation for multiple perspectives, and the importance of a “boundary object” in forging strong interactions among project participants. Further, a toolkit of approaches for natural scientists is presented. This toolkit can be used to organize work in collaboration with stakeholders and other participants and can help overcome barriers to a meaningful contribution to the policy process. Fundamentally, this challenge will require approaches that are more grounded in meaning, narration, and reflection.

School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Amanda H. Lynch, School of Geography and Environmental Science, P.O. Box IIA, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia, E-mail: amanda.lynch@arts.monash.edu.au
Save