This work was supported by NOAA’s Hydrometeorology Testbed (HMT) program and the U.S. Weather Research Program (USWRP). The authors thank all past FFaIR Experiment participants for their enthusiasm and valuable insight into the flash flood forecast problem. In addition, Michael Smith (National Water Center), Russ Schumacher (Colorado State University), and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful feedback to improve the quality of this paper.
FOR FURTHER READING
Brooks, H. E., , M. Kay, , and J. A. Hart, 1998: Objective limits on forecasting skill of rare events. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 552–555.
Ebert, E. E., 2008: Fuzzy verification of high resolution gridded forecasts: A review and proposed framework. Meteor. Appl., 15, 51–66, doi:10.1002/met.25.
Elmore, K. L., , Z. L. Flemig, , V. Lakshmanann, , B. T. Kaney, , V. Farmer, , H. D. Reeves, , and L. P. Rothfusz, 2014: MPING: Crowd-sourcing weather reports for research. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 1335–1342, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00014.1.
Fritsch, J. M., , and R. E. Carbone, 2004: Improving quantitative precipitation forecasts in the warm season: A USWRP research and development strategy. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 955–964, doi:10.1175/BAMS-85-7-955.
Gochis, D. J., , W. Yu, , and D. N. Yates, 2014: The WRF-Hydro model technical description and user's guide, version 2.0. NCAR Technical Document, 120 pp.
Gourley, J. J., and et al. , 2013: A unified flash flood database across the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 799–805, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00198.1.
Hitchens, N. M., , H. E. Brooks, , and M. P. Kay, 2013: Objective limits on forecasting skill of rare events. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 525–534, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-12-00113.1.
Hong, Y., , and J. J. Gourley, 2015: Radar Hydrology: Principles, Models, and Applications. 1st ed. CRC Press, 180 pp.
Jirak, I. L., , S. J. Weiss, , and C. J. Melick, 2012: The SPC storm-scale ensemble of opportunity: Overview and results from the 2012 Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiment. Preprints, 26th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Nashville, TN. Amer. Meteor. Soc. P9.137.
NOAA, 2012: Hydrologic Services Program, Definitions and General Terminology. National Weather Service Manual 10–950, 5 pp, [Available online at www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/sym/pd01009050curr.pdf.]
Reed, S., , J. Schaake, , and Z. Zhang, 2007: A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations. J. Hydrol., 337, 402–420, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.015.
Schmidt, J. A., , A. J. Anderson, , and J. H. Paul, 2007: Spatially variable, physically-derived flash flood guidance. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Hydrology, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 6B.2.
Schwartz, C. S., and et al. , 2009: Next-day convection-allowing WRF model guidance: A second look at 2-km versus 4-km grid spacing. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 3351–3372, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2924.1.
Schwartz, C. S., and et al. , 2010: Toward improved convection-allowing ensembles: Model physics sensitivities and optimizing probabilistic guidance with small ensemble membership. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 263–280, doi:10.1175/2009WAF2222267.1.
Sukovich, E. M., , F. M. Ralph, , F. E. Barthold, , D. W. Reynolds, , and D. R. Novak, 2014: Extreme quantitative precipitation forecast performance at the Weather Prediction Center from 2001 to 2011. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 894–911, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-13-00061.1.
Sweeney, T. L., 1992: Modernized areal flash flood guidance. NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS HYDRO 44, Hydrologic Research Laboratory, National Weather Service, NOAA, 21 pp.