We thank our colleagues in Japan, Australia, and other parts of the world for helping us give a global perspective to this issue. We thank Aaron Tuttle and the Argentinian Weather Service for providing example images.
John Cho was sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration under Air Force Contract FA8721-05-C-0002. Elena Saltikoff and Philippe Tristant were sponsored by EIG EUMETNET. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. government or EUMETNET members.
Australian Communications and Media Authority, 2014: Radiocommunications (low interference potential devices) class licence 2000. Australian Government ComLaw, accessed 3 May 2016. [Available online at www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2014C00930/.]
Bharadwaj, N., and V. Chandrasekar, 2012: Wideband waveform design principles for solid-state weather radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 29, 14–31, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00030.1.
Borisov, Y., Y. Pavlyukov, E. Savelov, and A. Ivanova, 2013: Operational Russian weather radars: State of affairs and plans. BALTRAD+ User Forum IV, Berlin, Germany, BALTRAD.[Available online at http://baltrad.eu/sites/default/files/BALTRAD%2BBUFIV-The_Russian_Weather_Radar_Network.pdf.]
Carroll, J. E., F. H. Sanders, R. L. Sole, and G. A. Sanders, 2010: Case study: Investigation of interference into 5 GHz weather radars from unlicensed national information infrastructure devices, Part 1. NTIA Tech. Rep. TR-11–473, 44 pp. [Available online at www.its.bldrdoc.gov/publications/2548.aspx.]
Carroll, J. E., G. A. Sanders, F. H. Sanders, and R. L. Sole, 2011: Case study: Investigation of interference into 5 GHz weather radars from unlicensed national information infrastructure devices, Part 2. NTIA Tech. Rep. TR-11–479, 28 pp. [Available online at www.its.bldrdoc.gov/publications/2554.aspx.]
Carroll, J. E., G. A. Sanders, F. H. Sanders, and R. L. Sole, 2012: Case study: Investigation of interference into 5 GHz weather radars from unlicensed national information infrastructure devices, Part 3. NTIA Tech. Rep. TR-12–486, 46 pp. [Available online at www.its.bldrdoc.gov/publications/2677.aspx.]
Cho, J. Y. N., 2011: Analysis of 5-GHz U-NII device signals received by the PSF TDWR. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Project Memo. 43PM-Wx-0119, 28 pp.
Cho, J. Y. N., and M. E. Weber, 2010: Terminal Doppler weather radar enhancements. Proc. 2010 IEEE Radar Conf., Washington, D.C., IEEE, 1245–1249.
ECC, 2014: The current status of DFS (dynamic frequency selection) in the 5 GHz frequency range. ECC Rep. 192, 44 pp. [Available online at www.erodocdb.dk/Docs/doc98/official/pdf/ECCREP192.PDF.]
ETSI, 2012: Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN); 5 GHz high performance RLAN; Harmonized EN covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the R&TTE directive. ETSI Rep. ETSI EN 301 893 V1.7.1 (2012-06), 90 pp. [Available online at www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301800_301899/301893/01.07.01_60/en_301893v010701p.pdf.]
Husnoo, N., and J. Sugier, 2014: Dual polarisation technique to improve the identification of RLAN interference. Extended Abstracts, Eighth European Conf. on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology, Garmish-Partenkirchen, Germany, ERAD, 016. [Available online at www.pa.op.dlr.de/erad2014/programme/ShortAbstracts/016_short.pdf.]
Huuskonen, A., E. Saltikoff, and I. Holleman, 2014: The operational weather radar network in Europe. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 897–907, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00216.1.
Industry Canada, 2007: Licence-exempt radio apparatus (all frequency bands): Category I equipment. Canada Gazette Notice SMSE-001–07, RSS-210, 54 pp. [Available online at www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf01320.html.]
ITU-R Resolution 229 [COM5/16], 2013: Use of the bands 5150-5250MHz, 5250-5350MHz and 5470-5725MHz by the mobile service for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks. The World Radio-communication Conference (WRC-03), Geneva, 2003. [Available online at www.itu.int/oth/R0A0E00002E/en.]
Joe, P., F. Whetten, J. Scott, and D. Whetten, 2007: Airborne RLAN and weather radar interference a C-band. 33rd Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Cairns, Australia, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 13B.8. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/123523.pdf.]
Keränen, R., L. Rojas, and P. Nyberg, 2013: Progress in mitigation of WLAN interferences at weather radar. 36th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Breckenridge, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 336. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/36Radar/webprogram/Paper229098.html.]
McLaughlin, D., and Coauthors, 2009: Short-wavelength technology and the potential for distributed networks of small radar systems. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1797–1817, doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2507.1.
NEXRAD TAC, 2007: New-generation weather radar monitoring network in China. NOAA Technical Advisory Committee Meeting, Norman, Oklahoma, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [Available online at www.roc.noaa.gov/wsr88d/PublicDocs/TAC/2007/CINRAD%20In%20China%20TAC%20March%2007.pdf.]
Peura, M., 2002: Computer vision methods for anomaly removal. Proc. Second European Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Delft, Netherlands, ERAD, 312–317. [Available online at www.copernicus.org/erad/online/erad-312.pdf.]
Pigg, T., 2009: TDWR radio frequency interference issues. Federal Aviation Administration TDWR Program Support Facility Rep., 51 pp.
Ruzanski, E., V. Chandrasekar, and Y. Wang, 2011: The CASA nowcasting system. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 28, 640–655, doi:10.1175/2011JTECHA1496.1.
Sireci, O., 2015: Evaluation of CIMO weather radars survey and web-based weather radar database. WMO IOM Rep. 118, 71 pp. [Available online at https://googledrive.com/host/0BwdvoC9AeWjUazhkNTdXRXUzOEU/iom_118_en.pdf.]
Tuttle, A., 2012: An update on RFI to the TDWR caused by U-NIIs and wireless surveillance camera networks. Federal Aviation Administration TDWR Program Support Facility Rep., 31 pp.
Weber, M. E., J. Y. N. Cho, J. S. Herd, J. M. Flavin, W. E. Benner, and G. S. Torok, 2007: The next-generation multimission U.S. surveillance radar network. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 1739–1751, doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-11-1739.