Corrigendum

Gabriel A. Vecchi Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Gabriel A. Vecchi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rym Msadek Centre Européen de Recherche et de Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Rym Msadek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Whit Anderson NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Whit Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
You-Soon Chang Department of Earth Science Education, Kongju National University, South Korea

Search for other papers by You-Soon Chang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas Delworth NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Thomas Delworth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Keith Dixon NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Keith Dixon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rich Gudgel NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Rich Gudgel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anthony Rosati University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Anthony Rosati in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bill Stern University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Bill Stern in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gabriele Villarini IIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Search for other papers by Gabriele Villarini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew Wittenberg NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Andrew Wittenberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Xiaosong Yang University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Xiaosong Yang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Fanrong Zeng NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Fanrong Zeng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rong Zhang NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Rong Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Shaoqing Zhang Physical Oceanography Laboratory of Ocean University of China, and Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
Function Laboratory for Ocean Dynamics and Climate, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China

Search for other papers by Shaoqing Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

This article is included in the North American Climate in CMIP5 Experiments special collection.

Corresponding author: Gabriel A. Vecchi, gvecchi@princeton.edu

© 2017 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

This article is included in the North American Climate in CMIP5 Experiments special collection.

Corresponding author: Gabriel A. Vecchi, gvecchi@princeton.edu

In the original manuscript of Vecchi et al. (2013), Eq. (6), which is used to quantify the effective number of degrees of freedom in two autocorrelated time series Neff, was incorrectly transcribed from Bretherton et al. (1999). The correct equation is
eq1
where N is the number of samples in each time series, and and are the biased estimates of the autocorrelation of each time series at lag τ. We evaluated whether the equation was incorrectly transcribed in the text of Vecchi et al. (2013), or whether the incorrect equation in the published paper was implemented in the calculations for the manuscript (which would have led to a substantial overestimate of the effective degrees of freedom). We found that the equation had been incorrectly transcribed.

However, in reviewing the implementation of the equation an error was found. This error stemmed from an indexing mistake when referencing an array, in which the lag-1 autocorrelation term in the summation in the denominator (which is always less than 1) was summed once instead of twice, while the lag-0 autocorrelation term (which is exactly 1) was summed twice. Therefore, the degrees of freedom were underestimated in the original Vecchi et al. (2013) manuscript; this led to an overestimation in the size of the error bars in Figs. 2, 4, and 9.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

As in Fig. 2 from Vecchi et al. (2013), but with error bars computed correctly, accounting for autocorrelation in the effective degrees of freedom as in Bretherton et al. (1999).

Citation: Journal of Climate 30, 18; 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0335.1

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

(left) As in Fig. 4, top right, and (right) as in Fig. 4, bottom right, from Vecchi et al. (2013), but with error bars computed correctly, accounting for autocorrelation in the effective degrees of freedom as in Bretherton et al. (1999).

Citation: Journal of Climate 30, 18; 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0335.1

Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.

As in Fig. 9 from Vecchi et al. (2013), but with error bars computed correctly, accounting for autocorrelation in the effective degrees of freedom as in Bretherton et al. (1999).

Citation: Journal of Climate 30, 18; 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0335.1

For Figs. 2 and 4, because the lag-1 autocorrelation of both the time series was close to 1, the underestimation in Neff was generally between 1 and 2, and resulted in only minor changes to the error bars, without impacting the validity of the statements about statistical significance.

However, for Fig. 9, because the lag-1 autocorrelation of the time series once the 1994/95 shift had been removed was small, Neff was sometimes underestimated by a factor of 2. However, since the most of the correlations were low, most of the statements about statistical significance were not impacted. One exception is that, with the correct error bars, there is now statistically significant evidence (at the p < 0.1 level) that the lead 2–6-yr initialized predictions with GFDL CM2.1 outperform the various other when the target is the number of hurricane counts in the Atlantic after removing the changepoint across 1994–95.

The principal conclusions of the manuscript are unchanged by the error.

REFERENCES

  • Bretherton, C. S., M. Widmann, V. P. Dymnikov, J. M. Wallace, and I. Bladé, 1999: The effective number of spatial degrees of freedom of a time-varying field. J. Climate, 12, 19902009, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1990:TENOSD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vecchi, G. A., and Coauthors, 2013: Multiyear predictions of North Atlantic hurricane frequency: Promise and limitations. J. Climate, 26, 53375357, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00464.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Save
  • Bretherton, C. S., M. Widmann, V. P. Dymnikov, J. M. Wallace, and I. Bladé, 1999: The effective number of spatial degrees of freedom of a time-varying field. J. Climate, 12, 19902009, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1990:TENOSD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vecchi, G. A., and Coauthors, 2013: Multiyear predictions of North Atlantic hurricane frequency: Promise and limitations. J. Climate, 26, 53375357, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00464.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2187 1669 522
PDF Downloads 176 47 11