Corrigendum

Dong Wan Kim aDepartment of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Dong Wan Kim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Sukyoung Lee aDepartment of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Sukyoung Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Free access

For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Dong Wan Kim, dxk582@psu.edu

For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Dong Wan Kim, dxk582@psu.edu

There was a computational error regarding the wave activity flux vectors shown in Figs. 2a–c of Kim and Lee (2021). We present the corrected Fig. 2 below. This change does not impact the major conclusion that the North Pacific Ocean and eastern Canada are the two main forcing regions. In fact, the corrected figure is more supportive of this conclusion because the wave activity flux vectors diverge from these two locations and the vectors are more parallel to the direction in which the destructive interference pattern propagates. We have also fixed a spelling error in the title of the figure.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Pentad composites of (a)–(c) 300-hPa eddy streamfunction anomaly (shading) with wave activity flux (vectors) and (d)–(f) 2-m temperature anomaly. Vectors with magnitude larger than 0.1 m2 s−2 are plotted, and the reference vector is 2 m2 s−2. Pentads are centered at lag days (top) −5, (middle) 0, and (bottom) +5 of destructive SWI events. Stippled areas represent statistical significance at the 95% level as computed by the Monte Carlo resampling method.

Citation: Journal of Climate 35, 24; 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0913.1

REFERENCE

Kim, D. W., and S. Lee, 2021: Relationship between boreal summer circulation trend and destructive stationary–transient wave interference in the Western Hemisphere. J. Climate, 34, 49894999, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0530.1.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation
Save
  • Kim, D. W., and S. Lee, 2021: Relationship between boreal summer circulation trend and destructive stationary–transient wave interference in the Western Hemisphere. J. Climate, 34, 49894999, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0530.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fig. 2.

    Pentad composites of (a)–(c) 300-hPa eddy streamfunction anomaly (shading) with wave activity flux (vectors) and (d)–(f) 2-m temperature anomaly. Vectors with magnitude larger than 0.1 m2 s−2 are plotted, and the reference vector is 2 m2 s−2. Pentads are centered at lag days (top) −5, (middle) 0, and (bottom) +5 of destructive SWI events. Stippled areas represent statistical significance at the 95% level as computed by the Monte Carlo resampling method.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 228 76 0
Full Text Views 113 62 5
PDF Downloads 83 38 6