A Dynamical Adjustment Approach to Estimating Forced and Internal Variability in the North Atlantic

Douglas Nedza aDepartment of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

Search for other papers by Douglas Nedza in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Timothy DelSole aDepartment of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
bCenter for Ocean-Land-Atmospheric Sciences, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

Search for other papers by Timothy DelSole in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open access

Abstract

Quantifying the relative contributions of external forcing and internal variability to North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature (NASST) has important implications for attributing and predicting climate changes around the North Atlantic basin. Many previous methods have approached this problem by estimating the externally forced signal directly, making assumptions about forced variability for which there is no consensus. In this work, the separation of variability is approached in a fundamentally different way that does not specify the forced response’s temporal evolution. We propose a dynamical adjustment method in which the internal, spatially uniform component of NASST is predicted based on patterns of NASST that are orthogonal to the spatially uniform pattern. When applied to preindustrial simulations, the dynamical adjustment demonstrates skill in reconstructing the NASST basin mean variability. Applying the dynamical adjustment to historical simulations demonstrates skill in a majority of climate models, although the skill is reduced relative to preindustrial simulations because external variability partly contaminates the predictors. The dynamical adjustment is compared to several other methods which directly estimate the externally forced signal. We find that dynamical adjustment performs similarly to these comparative methods, despite the fundamentally different prediction method. However, methods based on different principles yield considerably different estimates of external and internal variability.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Douglas Nedza, dnedza@gmu.com

Abstract

Quantifying the relative contributions of external forcing and internal variability to North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature (NASST) has important implications for attributing and predicting climate changes around the North Atlantic basin. Many previous methods have approached this problem by estimating the externally forced signal directly, making assumptions about forced variability for which there is no consensus. In this work, the separation of variability is approached in a fundamentally different way that does not specify the forced response’s temporal evolution. We propose a dynamical adjustment method in which the internal, spatially uniform component of NASST is predicted based on patterns of NASST that are orthogonal to the spatially uniform pattern. When applied to preindustrial simulations, the dynamical adjustment demonstrates skill in reconstructing the NASST basin mean variability. Applying the dynamical adjustment to historical simulations demonstrates skill in a majority of climate models, although the skill is reduced relative to preindustrial simulations because external variability partly contaminates the predictors. The dynamical adjustment is compared to several other methods which directly estimate the externally forced signal. We find that dynamical adjustment performs similarly to these comparative methods, despite the fundamentally different prediction method. However, methods based on different principles yield considerably different estimates of external and internal variability.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Douglas Nedza, dnedza@gmu.com
Save