1. Introduction
Peatlands account for 3.08 million km2 or 10%–20% of the circumpolar boreal biome (Aselmann and Crutzen 1989; Paavilainen and Päivänen 1995). Despite their widespread occurrence, they are typically found in remote areas, making their study difficult and costly. The water budgets of boreal peatlands are of great importance to accurately model regional hydrological processes in northern countries such as Canada, Finland, and Russia. To model water budgets, a precise estimate of evapotranspiration ET is essential, as it links water and energy budgets through latent heat fluxes and can account for up to 65% of annual precipitation in boreal regions (Verry 1988). The ET can be measured directly with the eddy covariance technique, considered as one of the most reliable and accurate methods (Itier and Brunet 1996). Unfortunately, eddy covariance towers are costly, and thus, most of the available meteorological data over boreal peatlands come from basic weather stations. Therefore, reliable methods to estimate ET have to be developed, but this is a challenging task given both the lack of data and the complex nature of peatlands.
Previous studies have identified several unique peatland features affecting ET. This type of wetland is composed mainly of organic matter, characterized by a much higher porosity (80%–90% for undecomposed peat) than mineral soil (30%–65%) (Paavilainen and Päivänen 1995). This attribute of peat soils is the result of the presence of large and well-drained macropores (Baird 1997; Silins and Rothwell 1998; Schwärzel et al. 2002; Dimitrov et al. 2010a) inducing greater air permeability (Dullien 1991). The ET could be increased by internal air circulation and convective heat exchanges in the peat fiber (Ingham and Pop 2002; Nield and Bejan 2006). On the other hand, it may be decreased by reduction of the peat water content through macropore drainage (Dimitrov et al. 2010b). A shallow water-table depth is typical of wetlands (Bailey et al. 1997), suggesting that ET will tend to be more energy limited than water limited (Price 1991; Williams et al. 2012). In addition, peatland vegetation consists of site-specific combinations of vascular (sedges, scrubs) and nonvascular (mosses) plants (Humphreys et al. 2006). In moss-dominated peatlands, the abundance of water tends to induce ET rates similar to those of open-water conditions (Kim and Verma 1996; Brümmer et al. 2012), while the presence of vascular plants modulates ET significantly through stomatal resistance (Kim and Verma 1996; Kellner 2001; Shimoyama et al. 2004; Humphreys et al. 2006; Petrone et al. 2007; Parmentier et al. 2009; Brümmer et al. 2012). Peatlands are also characterized by a unique thermal regime greatly influenced by the aforementioned features (Petrone et al. 2004; Weiss et al. 2006; Dimitrov et al. 2010a; Dissanayaka et al. 2012). Namely, the microtopography depicted by the presence of hummocks and hollows induces significant spatial heterogeneity in peat temperatures (Dimitrov et al. 2010a). For instance, the peat temperature in hummocks varies more rapidly than in hollows. This is primarily caused by conductive heat transfer from the top and the exposed sides. The high porosity ensures that convective heat transfer within the peat medium is important as well (Dimitrov et al. 2010a). Soil moisture and, indirectly, water-table depth also play a critical role for soil thermal conductivity and heat capacity. However, the impacts of this thermal regime on ET are not well known.
Previous studies used several different ET models for peatlands. Kellner (2001) stated that an energy balance approach like the Priestley and Taylor (1972) equation is very efficient for estimating ET from such surfaces. In fact, this model is the most widely used over peatlands (Kellner 2001; Petrone et al. 2004, 2007; Admiral et al. 2006; Humphreys et al. 2006; Parmentier et al. 2009; Sonnentag et al. 2010; Brümmer et al. 2012; Runkle et al. 2014). Other formulations based on the energy budget like the Penman (1948) and Penman–Monteith (Monteith 1965) equations are also commonly used (Koerselman and Beltman 1988; Campbell and Williamson 1997; Lafleur et al. 2005; Schwärzel et al. 2006; Wu et al. 2010). Despite their proven efficiency, their net radiation data requirements make them less suitable for the remote boreal peatlands, as ground-based measurements of this variable are rarely available. This is especially true since remote sensing data of net radiation are not easy to use for practical hydrological applications because of their infrequent coverage (biweekly or less when clouds are present; Kleissl et al. 2009). Also, determining net radiation with basic meteorological data is quite challenging and is likely to introduce additional uncertainties (Archibald and Walter 2014). A possible alternative to estimate ET is the simplified bulk-transfer approach (Brutsaert 2005), which is based on the equations of the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) for momentum and water vapor profiles under near-neutral conditions, wet surfaces, and fixed roughness parameters. This approach is typically used for open-water surfaces (Fairall et al. 1996; Omstedt et al. 1997; Tanny et al. 2008); however, the relatively wet surface conditions characterizing boreal peatlands seem to place them in the applicability range of the model. Some studies have previously used the bulk-transfer approach on peatlands as a means to parameterize the surface roughness, but not for ET estimation (Shimoyama et al. 2004; Raddatz et al. 2009).
The main goal of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of the bulk-transfer approach for ET estimation over wet boreal peatlands. After a thorough derivation of the bulk-transfer approach, this paper describes the atmospheric stratification over three boreal peatlands, showing the frequent occurrence of near-neutral atmospheric conditions and suggesting a few hypotheses explaining this peculiar behavior. A quantification of the uncertainties associated with the bulk-transfer approach follows: namely, we demonstrate that boreal peatlands seem to fall in the applicability range of the bulk-transfer approach. A comparison is then made between the modeling results and observations obtained with the eddy covariance method, along with other common ET models. The entire analysis is based on original field data collected over a boreal bog (Necopastic) and supported by flux data from two other sites (Mer Bleue and Western Peatland) in Canada.
2. Background
a. Monin–Obukhov similarity theory











b. Bulk-transfer approach








3. Methods
a. Bulk-transfer modeling hypotheses
For the bulk-transfer approach to be applicable over peatlands, the three following assumptions are made: (i) near-neutral conditions are assumed time invariant; (ii) the peat surface is constantly saturated; and (iii) the momentum roughness length is constant and given by










Using this strategy, only five meteorological variables are needed to run the model: wind speed, surface temperature, air temperature, atmospheric pressure, and relative humidity. The model also requires various measurement heights as well as an average vegetation height, all of them considered constant.
b. Field sites and instrumentation
The main experimental site is a boreal ombrotrophic bog (Fig. 1b) named Necopastic after the nearby river, a tributary to La Grande River. It is located in the James Bay lowlands, northern Québec, Canada (53°40′28″N, 78°10′14″W; elevation is 71 m MSL and area is 0.6 km2). The site is mostly covered with Sphagnum mosses, lichens, and shrubs and is surrounded by black spruce trees, 6–8 m tall [see Nadeau et al. (2013b) for more details]. The region is characterized by a subarctic climate largely controlled by the nearby James Bay, with a mean annual temperature of −2.4°C and mean annual precipitation of 697 mm. The eddy covariance setup consisted of a 6-m flux tower with a three-dimensional sonic anemometer (CSAT3, Campbell Scientific, United States) equipped with a fine wire thermocouple and an open-path CO2/H2O gas analyzer (LI-7500, LI-COR Biosciences, United States). A net radiometer (CNR1, Kipp and Zonen, the Netherlands) monitored solar and terrestrial radiation, while an infrared radiometer (SI-111, Apogee Instruments, United States) measured surface temperature. Ground heat flux was measured with soil heat flux plates (HFT3, Campbell Scientific, United States) and their measurements were verified with the calorimetric method (Halliwell and Rouse 1987; Ochsner et al. 2007). The tower also featured various basic weather instruments to monitor wind speed
(a) Location of the three study sites in Canada, (b) Necopastic (22 Jul 2012), (c) Mer Bleue (11 Jun 2011; source: Elyn R. Humphreys), and (d) Western Peatland (July 2007; source: Lawrence B. Flanagan).
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
Field measurements from two other boreal peatlands with contrasting climates were also included in the analysis. Raw data for the two sites were obtained from the FLUXNET-Canada Data Information System. The first field site is the Mer Bleue bog near Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (45°24′34″N, 75°31′7″W; elevation is 70 m MSL and area is 28 km2), a typical raised ombrotrophic bog (Fig. 1c), covered with Sphagnum mosses and shrubs [see Roulet et al. (2007) for more details]. The area is characterized by a cold, humid, continental climate with a mean annual temperature of 5.8°C and mean annual precipitation of 910 mm (Fraser et al. 2001). The experimental setup included an 8-m tower equipped with a three-dimensional sonic anemometer (1012R2 Solent, Gill Instruments, United Kingdom) and a closed-path gas analyzer (IRGA, model 6262, LI-COR Biosciences, United States), along with various other meteorological instruments
The second FLUXNET-Canada site is the Western Peatland site near Lac la Biche, Alberta, Canada (54°57′14″N, 112°28′1″W; elevation is 540 m MSL and area is 10 km2). It is a treed fen (Fig. 1d) covered with a combination of Sphagnum, Aulocomnium, and brown mosses, as well as shrubs and approximately 6-m tall trees [black spruce and larch; see Syed et al. (2006) for more details]. The Western Peatland site is characterized by a dry continental climate typical of the Canadian Great Plains, with a mean annual temperature of 2.1°C and mean annual precipitation of 504 mm (Flanagan and Syed 2011). The eddy covariance setup consisted of a three-dimensional sonic anemometer (SAT Solent R3, Gill Instruments, United Kingdom) and a closed-path gas analyzer (LI-7000, LI-COR Biosciences, United States) mounted on a 9-m flux tower, again with additional basic weather instruments
c. Data processing
Turbulent fluxes of heat, momentum, and water vapor over the Necopastic bog were computed using EddyPro, version 5.0 (LI-COR Biosciences, United States), an open-source software designed to process eddy covariance data. The precise data processing is described in Nadeau et al. (2013b). Data runs with winds blowing from a 120° sector centered on the back of the main sonic anemometer were excluded from the analysis as they were in the wake of the tower structure. Data segments with poor flux quality according to the criteria described in Mauder and Foken (2011) as well as during rainfall events were also discarded from the analysis, along with 30-min periods where the average friction velocity was under 0.2 m s−1. To obtain a continuous flux time series, gap filling was performed following a standard FLUXNET approach (see Falge et al. 2001), that is, small gaps were filled by linear interpolation and large gaps were filled using marginal distribution sampling as described in Reichstein et al. (2005). The data processing for the Mer Bleue and Western Peatland followed the FLUXNET-Canada protocol (Amiro et al. 2006), while the filtering and gap filling was performed using the aforementioned method. Note that the very strict data filtering procedure removed 46%, 28%, and 43% of the data points for the Necopastic, Mer Bleue, and Western Peatland sites, respectively.
The averaging period for the ET fluxes was 30 min and was determined using an Ogive plots analysis. The observations were collected over a full summer at the Necopastic site, that is, from 24 June to 27 September 2012. For consistency, only summer observations (from 20 June to 20 September) at the two other sites were analyzed. Their data spanned a much longer period; at Mer Bleue five summers (1999–2003) were included in the analysis, while at the Western Peatland site seven summers (2003–09) were analyzed. Those multiple summers were added to the analysis to test the bulk-transfer approach on the largest dataset possible.
d. Comparison models and metrics






In the Penman equation, the left term within square brackets represents the equilibrium evaporation, and the right term accounts for air advection effects. An
e. Bulk-transfer error formulation
There are two main sources of uncertainty in the bulk-transfer formulation: (i) whether or not there is a near-neutral atmosphere and (ii) whether or not there is a wet surface. Since the experimental setup for each site included an eddy covariance tower, it is possible to quantify the errors associated with each assumption.










4. Results and discussion
a. Distribution of atmospheric stability
Figure 2 shows the frequency distribution of the atmospheric stability parameter
Distribution of atmospheric stratification at the three sites. The striped portion of each bar represents nighttime periods (with negative net radiation).
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
Characteristics and proportion of near-neutral periods over several surface types.
We hypothesize that atmospheric buoyancy effects are minimized at this site due in part to the large thermal inertia of peatlands with shallow water tables. The thermal properties of peat media are largely governed by the volumetric water content (Dissanayaka et al. 2012). Indeed, the large porosity and high moisture content of the peat increases heat capacity because this property has a higher value for water (Novak and Black 1985). Saturated peatlands have also a similar thermal conductivity to that of dry mineral soils (Oke 1987). However, since they have a much greater heat storage capacity, their thermal inertia is much higher. This leads to weak daily fluctuations of surface temperatures and thus to small sensible heat exchanges, as well as weak buoyancy effects. Figure 3 presents the mean energy budget at the Necopastic site, which shows that daytime ground heat flux can take substantial values considering that net radiation has an average midday peak of ~350 W m−2. In addition, Fig. 3 shows that when solar radiation is supplied to the surface, the large water availability favors latent heat exchange in the energy balance. As an indication, the average midday Bowen ratios have values of 0.5, 0.77, and 0.83 for the Necopastic, Mer Bleue, and Western Peatland sites, respectively. The significantly higher water-table levels at the Necopastic site (11 cm below the surface on average vs 50 and 45 cm at the Mer Bleue and Western Peatland sites, respectively) can in all likelihood explain the higher occurrences of near-neutral periods by enhancing ground and latent heat fluxes.
Mean energy budget at the Necopastic site for the summer 2012, where
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
Near-neutral conditions can also occur when cloudy conditions prevail, as clouds reduce the available energy at the surface, thus decreasing sensible heat exchanges. The three field sites were indeed also subject to frequent nighttime fog. Guided by hourly photographs taken at the Necopastic site, the following criteria were applied to identify typical foggy conditions: (i) vapor pressure deficit under 100 Pa, (ii) net radiation fluxes between −50 and 50 W m−2, and (iii) wind speeds under 1.5 m s−1. It was found that during 67%, 82%, and 79% of the nights, fog was present for at least half of the nighttime periods at the Necopastic, Mer Bleue, and Western Peatland sites, respectively. Nighttime fog acts as an insulating layer that lessens radiative cooling at the surface, reducing the strength of the nocturnal inversion and thus reinforcing the tendency toward near-neutral stability. In fact, for the Necopastic site, under nighttime foggy conditions, 70% of the 30-min data segments were under near-neutral conditions.
In addition to weak atmospheric buoyancy effects, near-neutral conditions can only occur under a certain level of mechanical mixing, described by the friction velocity
b. Error analysis on the model assumptions
1) Near-neutral conditions
Near-neutral conditions are the basis behind the use of the bulk-transfer method. However, as shown in section 4a, these conditions are especially common at the Necopastic site, but not so much at the two other sites. Thus, justifying the assumption of a constant near-neutral atmosphere is critical.
Figure 4 presents the variation of
Variation of
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
Figure 5 presents the histogram of
Distribution of the error related to atmospheric stability
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
2) Wet surface
The assumption of a wet surface stems from a need to simplify the bulk-transfer approach since it thereby cancels the dependence on surface specific humidity data. The peat surface is not always wet, especially at the Mer Bleue and Western Peatland sites, where the water table is always at least 30 cm below the surface, and sequences of several rain-free days regularly occur. However, this assumption is particularly relevant for the Necopastic site, where the water-table position varies between 3 and 18 cm below the surface. Figure 6 shows the comparison between
Comparison of
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
The water-table position at Mer Bleue is relatively stable during the measurement period, with an average of ~54 cm below the surface, except for the summers of 2000 (~35 cm below the surface) and 2003 (~50 cm below the surface). Consequently, for these two summers, the assumption of a saturated surface induces the smallest overestimation of theoretical surface specific humidity, as shown by the gentler slopes of their respective linear regressions. A similar trend is observed for the Western Peatland site where summers from 2003 to 2005 have a relatively stable water-table level at an average of ~30 cm below the surface while an increase in depth occurs thereafter (2006, ~46 cm; 2007, ~50 cm; 2008, ~55 cm; and 2009, ~66 cm below the surface). The slopes of the linear regression lines also appear to be increasing with time. This suggests that a deeper water table is associated with a nonsaturated surface.
Figure 7 shows the distribution of
Distribution of
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
In the end, the distribution of
3) Momentum roughness length
The assumption of a constant momentum roughness length
Figure 8 presents the histogram of the values of
Wind rose distribution of
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
No mean vegetation height estimates within the measurement footprint area were available at the two FLUXNET sites. The mean vegetation height was rather obtained by an iterative optimization approach using Eq. (4) and the relations described previously. This procedure gave
The main weakness of the assumption is that
4) Water vapor roughness length
Again, once
Wind rose distribution of
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
c. 30-min ET fluxes at the Necopastic site
Of the three sites included in this analysis, Necopastic is the one where the use of the bulk-transfer approach appears most promising. Indeed, it has the highest water table on average as well as the most frequent near-neutral conditions. As such, we attempt here to use this approach at the 30-min time scale. To do so, friction velocity is found by means of Eq. (4) and ET rates are determined with Eq. (5).
Figure 10 shows the comparison of the 30-min averaged
Comparison of
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
Performance of the bulk-transfer approach in modeling of
Similarly, Fig. 11 shows the comparison of 30-min-averaged ET rates obtained with the bulk-transfer model
Comparison of the 30-min-averaged ET measured with the eddy covariance tower and calculated with the bulk-transfer model
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
The modeled ET did not agree with observations under stable stratification (Table 2). The very high NME under such conditions is probably caused by the smaller values of ET, giving more relative weight to otherwise small errors. Surprisingly, the bulk-transfer model performed best under unstable daytime stratification. This result is probably a consequence of the few 30-min periods where the bulk-transfer approach computes a low ET while the observations are not negligible (i.e., the data points along the x axis in Fig. 11a). These significant outliers have a strong influence on the computed statistics by increasing NME and decreasing R2.
The bulk-transfer model appears to overestimate ET when observed values exceed 0.15 mm. We believe this is caused by a problem with the wet surface hypothesis. Indeed, these high ET values occur when net radiation is large and occasionally at the end of a sequence of several rain-free days, thereby suggesting that the surface was not saturated.
d. Cumulative ET
Side-by-side comparison of observed ET and its value computed by the bulk-transfer approach appears promising on a 30-min scale for the Necopastic site. For water budget analyses, longer time scales are needed though. Figure 12 presents the cumulative ET obtained with the eddy covariance tower, as well as that calculated with the bulk-transfer approach. The figure also features the cumulative ET from the Penman and Hargreaves–Samani equations presented in section 3d. Note that the Hargreaves–Samani curve has a smoother shape because of the fact that ET is computed on a daily basis with this model. Also, only the summer of 2003 is presented for Mer Bleue, since the Penman equation relies on net radiation data that are not available at this site for the summers of 1999–2002.
Cumulative ET from eddy covariance observations, bulk-transfer approach, and Penman and Hargreaves–Samani equations. (a) Necopastic, 2012; (b) Mer Bleue, 2003; (c) Western Peatland, 2004; (d) Western Peatland, 2005; (e) Western Peatland, 2006; (f) Western Peatland, 2007; (g) Western Peatland, 2008; and (h) Western Peatland, 2009.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
Figure 12 shows that the bulk-transfer approach performs well at estimating seasonal ET at the three field sites. The model offers a proper alternative to the Penman equation, even if the latter is generally more precise. The bulk-transfer approach generally underestimates ET in terms of total volumes. The summers of 2008 and 2009 on the Western Peatland are an exception to this conclusion, in all likelihood caused by the very low water-table height during that period. Note that under these conditions, the Penman equation also overestimates ET.
These results seem to agree with the conclusions drawn in section 4b: the errors induced by the modeling assumptions with the bulk-transfer approach can take significant value, but they tend to become negligible on a cumulative basis.
e. Daily ET
Table 3 compares the daily ET obtained with each model studied along with in situ observations at every field site. The results of the bulk-transfer approach are also shown graphically in Fig. 13. In Fig. 13a, the error bars associated with the eddy covariance data (x axis) are obtained using the random uncertainty estimation (Finkelstein and Sims 2001), while those associated with the bulk-transfer model (y axis) represent a sum of the errors associated with the meteorological instruments and the time-invariant, perfectly neutral atmosphere hypothesis. The latter is taken as the difference between the ET rates given by Eq. (2) with and without the inclusion of the stability correction term
General results and performance of the three models for the three sites, daily scale, and fixed and site-dependent
Daily ET estimated with the bulk-transfer model vs eddy covariance observation at (a) Necopastic, (b) Mer Bleue, and (c) Western Peatland sites. The solid line is a linear regression of the data, and the dashed line is the 1:1 line.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 4; 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0171.1
The bulk-transfer approach offers a fair alternative to the Penman equation in ET estimation, with only slightly higher NME values, particularly for the Necopastic and Western Peatland sites. Evidently, with the addition of net radiation inputs, the Penman equation provides the best ET estimates regardless of the study site or the performance metric used. This was to be expected, as solar radiation is a key driver of ET. The decrease in accuracy from Necopastic to the two FLUXNET sites is probably caused by their least amount of near-neutral 30-min segments. It seems reasonable that the ability of the bulk-transfer model to predict ET is correlated to the proportion of near-neutral periods. However, even for the Mer Bleue and Western Peatland sites, the bulk-transfer approach explains a greater percentage of the data variance than the Hargreaves–Samani equation (as expressed by the higher R2 value), despite both of them relying on the same amount of input variables.
As previously discussed, the bulk-transfer approach appears to overestimate ET when observations exceed a certain threshold (here 3 mm) at the Mer Bleue and Western Peatland sites. This behavior explains the high values of RMSE found at these two locations, as this metric is more sensitive to large errors. This is a limitation of this approach and could cause a significant ET overestimation by error accumulation.
The
5. Conclusions
The broad objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the processes controlling daily ET over boreal peatlands in order to find a simple model valid for regions with limited data availability. The analysis was supported by eddy covariance data, originating from a field survey (Necopastic) and from the FLUXNET-Canada database (Mer Bleue and Western Peatland).
At first, a detailed description of the atmospheric stability at the three sites was performed. The latter showed the recurrence of near-neutral atmospheric conditions owing to the thermal inertia of saturated peat, the typically small Bowen ratios, and frequent cloudy conditions. These three phenomena jointly act to minimize sensible heat flux and buoyancy effects, while mechanical mixing is nonnegligible. These atmospheric conditions allow us to simplify the MOST profile equations for momentum and water vapor, conducive to the bulk-transfer approach, which turns out to be a simple yet robust means to estimate ET. To do so, four assumptions are needed: (i) time-invariant near-neutral conditions, (ii) wet surface, (iii) constant momentum roughness length dependent on vegetation height, and (iv) constant water vapor roughness length. The precision of the model is proportional to the occurrence of near-neutral periods, which seems to be linked to the position of the water table. This last connection will have to be more thoroughly investigated in future studies. Other studies are also needed to show if other boreal peatlands are characterized by frequent near-neutral conditions.
This model provides a pragmatic framework to estimate and predict ET over peatlands, a landscape that is of a high importance to hydrologists and ecologists. Considering the remoteness and vastness of these environments, especially in boreal regions where ground-based radiation data are rarely available, the simplicity and low cost of the model is a significant breakthrough for understanding the processes involved, especially in an operational watershed-based hydrological context. Ultimately, the model could be applied to other types of wetlands, and even to other environments, given that near-neutral periods are frequent and that surface is wet. A next step for the model would also be to find a simple relation for the variation of
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Cree Nation of Chisasibi as well as S. Grindat, S. Lambert-Girard, G. Carrer, G. Hould-Gosselin, M. Oreiller, M. Fossey, C. Fortier, and C. Guay for their collaboration with the field campaign. We would also like to thank FLUXNET-Canada, and particularly Peter M. Lafleur, Elyn R. Humphreys, and Lawrence B. Flanagan of the research teams of the Mer Bleue and Western Peatland sites for providing the data and valuable comments and insights. This work was supported by Ouranos (consortium on regional climatology and adaptation to climate change), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences.
REFERENCES
Admiral, S. W., Lafleur P. M. , and Roulet N. T. , 2006: Controls on latent heat flux and energy partitioning at a peat bog in eastern Canada. Agric. For. Meteor., 140, 308–321, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.017.
Amiro, B. D., and Coauthors, 2006: Carbon, energy and water fluxes at mature and disturbed forest sites, Saskatchewan, Canada. Agric. For. Meteor., 136, 237–251, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.012.
Archibald, J. A., and Walter M. T. , 2014: Do energy-based PET models require more input data than temperature-based models? An evaluation at four humid FLUXNET sites. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 50, 497–508, doi:10.1111/jawr.12137.
Aselmann, I., and Crutzen P. J. , 1989: Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J. Atmos. Chem., 8, 307–358, doi:10.1007/BF00052709.
Bailey, W. G., Oke T. R. , and Rouse W. , Eds., 1997: Surface Climates of Canada. Canadian Association of Geographers Series in Canadian Geography, Vol. 4, McGill–Queen’s Press, 400 pp.
Baird, A. J., 1997: Field estimation of macropore functioning and surface hydraulic conductivity in a fen peat. Hydrol. Processes, 11, 287–295, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19970315)11:3<287::AID-HYP443>3.0.CO;2-L.
Brümmer, C., and Coauthors, 2012: How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest, peatland and grassland ecosystems. Agric. For. Meteor., 153, 14–30, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.04.008.
Brunet, Y., and Irvine M. R. , 2000: The control of coherent eddies in vegetation canopies: Streamwise structure spacing, canopy shear scale and atmospheric stability. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 94, 139–163, doi:10.1023/A:1002406616227.
Brutsaert, W., 1982: Evaporation into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications. D. Reidel, 299 pp.
Brutsaert, W., 2005: Hydrology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 605 pp.
Brutsaert, W., Sugita M. , and Fritschen L. J. , 1990: Inner region humidity characteristics of the neutral boundary layer over prairie terrain. Water Resour. Res., 26, 2931–2936, doi:10.1029/WR026i012p02931.
Campbell, D. I., and Williamson J. , 1997: Evaporation from a raised peat bog. J. Hydrol., 193, 142–160, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03149-6.
Coursolle, C., Giasson M.-A. , Margolis H. A. , and Bernier P. Y. , 2012: Moving towards carbon neutrality: CO2 exchange of a black spruce forest ecosystem during the first 10 years of recovery after harvest. Can. J. For. Res., 42, 1908–1918, doi:10.1139/x2012-133.
Dimitrov, D. D., Grant R. F. , Lafleur P. M. , and Humphreys E. R. , 2010a: Modeling peat thermal regime of an ombrotrophic peatland with hummock–hollow microtopography. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 74, 1406–1425, doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0288.
Dimitrov, D. D., Grant R. F. , Lafleur P. M. , and Humphreys E. R. , 2010b: Modeling the subsurface hydrology of Mer Bleue bog. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 74, 680–694, doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0148.
Dissanayaka, S. H., Hamamoto S. , Kawamoto K. , Komatsu T. , and Moldrup P. , 2012: Thermal properties of peaty soils: Effects of liquid-phase impedance factor and shrinkage. Vadose Zone J., 11, doi:10.2136/vzj2011.0092.
Dorsey, J. R., Nemitz E. , Gallagher M. W. , Fowler D. , Williams P. I. , Bower K. N. , and Beswick K. M. , 2002: Direct measurements and parametrisation of aerosol flux, concentration and emission velocity above a city. Atmos. Environ., 36, 791–800, doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00526-X.
Dullien, F. A., 1991: Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure. Academic Press, 574 pp.
Eichinger, W. E., Parlange M. B. , and Stricker H. , 1996: On the concept of equilibrium evaporation and the value of the Priestley–Taylor coefficient. Water Resour. Res., 32, 161–164, doi:10.1029/95WR02920.
Fairall, C. W., Bradley E. F. , Rogers D. P. , Edson J. B. , and Young G. S. , 1996: Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes for Tropical Ocean–Global Atmosphere Coupled–Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 3747–3764, doi:10.1029/95JC03205.
Falge, E., and Coauthors, 2001: Gap filling strategies for long term energy flux data sets. Agric. For. Meteor., 107, 71–77, doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00235-5.
Finkelstein, P. L., and Sims P. F. , 2001: Sampling error in eddy correlation flux measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3503–3509, doi:10.1029/2000JD900731.
Flanagan, L. B., and Syed K. H. , 2011: Stimulation of both photosynthesis and respiration in response to warmer and drier conditions in a boreal peatland ecosystem. Global Change Biol., 17, 2271–2287, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02378.x.
Fraser, C., Roulet N. T. , and Moore T. R. , 2001: Hydrology and dissolved organic carbon biogeochemistry in an ombrotrophic bog. Hydrol. Processes, 15, 3151–3166, doi:10.1002/hyp.322.
Froidevaux, M., and Coauthors, 2013: A Raman lidar to measure water vapor in the atmospheric boundary layer. Adv. Water Resour., 51, 345–356, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.04.008.
Grachev, A. A., Andreas E. L , Fairall C. W. , Guest P. S. , and Persson P. O. G. , 2007: SHEBA flux-profile relationships in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 124, 315–333, doi:10.1007/s10546-007-9177-6.
Halliwell, D. H., and Rouse W. R. , 1987: Soil heat flux in permafrost: Characteristics and accuracy of measurement. J. Climatol., 7, 571–584, doi:10.1002/joc.3370070605.
Hargreaves, G. H., and Samani Z. A. , 1982: Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 108, 225–230.
Heikinheimo, M., Kangas M. , Tourula T. , Venäläinen A. , and Tattari S. , 1999: Momentum and heat fluxes over lakes Tämnaren and Råksjö determined by the bulk-aerodynamic and eddy-correlation methods. Agric. For. Meteor., 98-99, 521–534, doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00121-5.
Higgins, C. W., Meneveau C. , and Parlange M. B. , 2007: The effect of filter dimension on the subgrid-scale stress, heat flux, and tensor alignments in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 360–375, doi:10.1175/JTECH1991.1.
Högström, U., 1988: Non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles in the atmospheric surface layer: A re-evaluation. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 42, 55–78, doi:10.1007/BF00119875.
Humphreys, E. R., Lafleur P. M. , Flanagan L. B. , Hedstrom N. , Syed K. H. , Glenn A. J. , and Granger R. , 2006: Summer carbon dioxide and water vapor fluxes across a range of northern peatlands. J. Geophys. Res., 111, G04011, doi:10.1029/2005JG000111.
Ingham, D. B., and Pop I. , 2002: Transport Phenomena in Porous Media. Vol. II. Elsevier, 450 pp.
Isabelle, P.-E., 2014: Simplification de l’estimation des taux d’évapotranspiration sur les tourbières boréales par la quasi-neutralité de l’atmosphère. M.S. thesis, Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Université du Québec, 202 pp.
Itier, B., and Brunet Y. , 1996: Recent developments and present trends in evaporation research: A partial survey. Evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling: Proceedings of the International Conference ASAE, C. Camp, E. Sadler, and R. Yoder, Eds., 1–20.
Katul, G. G., and Parlange M. B. , 1992: A Penman–Brutsaert model for wet surface evaporation. Water Resour. Res., 28, 121–126, doi:10.1029/91WR02324.
Kellner, E., 2001: Surface energy fluxes and control of evapotranspiration from a Swedish sphagnum mire. Agric. For. Meteor., 110 (2), 101–123, doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00283-0.
Kim, J., and Verma S. B. , 1996: Surface exchange of water vapour between an open sphagnum fen and the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 79, 243–264, doi:10.1007/BF00119440.
Kleissl, J., Hong S.-H. , and Hendrickx J. M. , 2009: New Mexico scintillometer network: Supporting remote sensing and hydrologic and meteorological models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 207–218, doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2480.1.
Koerselman, W., and Beltman B. , 1988: Evapotranspiration from fens in relation to Penman’s potential free water evaporation (Eo) and pan evaporation. Aquat. Bot., 31, 307–320, doi:10.1016/0304-3770(88)90019-8.
Kotani, A., and Sugita M. , 2005: Seasonal variation of surface fluxes and scalar roughness of suburban land covers. Agric. For. Meteor., 135, 1–21, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.09.012.
Lafleur, P. M., Roulet N. T. , Bubier J. L. , Frolking S. , and Moore T. R. , 2003: Interannual variability in the peatland–atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange at an ombrotrophic bog. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 17, 1036, doi:10.1029/2002GB001983.
Lafleur, P. M., Hember R. A. , Admiral S. W. , and Roulet N. T. , 2005: Annual and seasonal variability in evapotranspiration and water table at a shrub-covered bog in southern Ontario, Canada. Hydrol. Processes, 19, 3533–3550, doi:10.1002/hyp.5842.
Leclerc, M. Y., Shaw R. H. , den Hartog G. , and Neumann H. H. , 1990: The influence of atmospheric stability on the budgets of the Reynolds stress and turbulent kinetic energy within and above a deciduous forest. J. Appl. Meteor., 29, 916–933, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0916:TIOASO>2.0.CO;2.
Liu, H. Z., Feng J. W. , Järvi L. , and Vesala T. , 2012: Four-year (2006–2009) eddy covariance measurements of CO2 flux over an urban area in Beijing. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7881–7892, doi:10.5194/acp-12-7881-2012.
Mahrt, L., Vickers D. , Edson J. , Wilczak J. M. , Hare J. , and Højstrup J. , 2001: Vertical structure of turbulence in offshore flow during RASEX. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 100, 47–61, doi:10.1023/A:1018982828967.
Mauder, M., and Foken T. , 2011: Documentation and instruction manual of the eddy-covariance software package TK3. Tech. Rep., Universität Bayreuth, 60 pp.
Metzger, M., McKeon B. , and Holmes H. , 2007: The near-neutral atmospheric surface layer: Turbulence and non-stationarity. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A365, 859–876, doi:10.1098/rsta.2006.1946.
Mölder, M., and Kellner E. , 2002: Excess resistance of bog surfaces in central Sweden. Agric. For. Meteor., 112, 23–30, doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00043-6.
Monin, A. S., and Yaglom A. M. , 1971: Statistical Fluid Mechanics. Vol. I. MIT Press, 769 pp.
Monteith, J., 1965: Evaporation and environment. The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, G. E. Fogg, Ed., Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, Vol. 19, Cambridge University Press, 205–234.
Moriwaki, R., and Kanda M. , 2006: Scalar roughness parameters for a suburban area. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 84, 1063–1071, doi:10.2151/jmsj.84.1063.
Nadeau, D. F., Pardyjak E. R. , Higgins C. W. , Huwald H. , and Parlange M. B. , 2013a: Flow during the evening transition over steep alpine slopes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 607–624, doi:10.1002/qj.1985.
Nadeau, D. F., Rousseau A. N. , Coursolle C. , Margolis H. A. , and Parlange M. B. , 2013b: Summer methane fluxes from a boreal bog in northern Québec, Canada, using eddy covariance measurements. Atmos. Environ., 81, 464–474, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.044.
Nield, D. A., and Bejan A. , 2006: Convection in Porous Media. Springer-Verlag, 657 pp.
Novak, M., and Black T. , 1985: Theoretical determination of the surface energy balance and thermal regimes of bare soils. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 33, 313–333, doi:10.1007/BF00116682.
Novick, K. A., Stoy P. C. , Katul G. G. , Ellsworth D. S. , Siqueira M. B. , Juang J. , and Oren R. , 2004: Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in a warm temperate grassland. Oecologia, 138, 259–274, doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1388-z.
Ochsner, T. E., Sauer T. J. , and Horton R. , 2007: Soil heat storage measurements in energy balance studies. Agron. J., 99, 311–319, doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0103S.
Oke, T. R., 1987: Boundary Layer Climates. Routledge, 435 pp.
Omstedt, A., Meuller L. , and Nyberg L. , 1997: Interannual, seasonal and regional variations of precipitation and evaporation over the Baltic Sea. Ambio, 26 (8), 484–492.
Paavilainen, E., and Päivänen J. , 1995: Peatland Forestry: Ecology and Principles. Springer, 253 pp.
Pagowski, M., 2006: An iterative solution of flux–profile relationships in the surface layer for regional model applications. Atmos. Environ., 40, 6892–6897, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.027.
Park, S.-J., Park S.-U. , and Ho C.-H. , 2010: Roughness length of water vapor over land surfaces and its influence on latent heat flux. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 21, 855–867, doi:10.3319/TAO.2009.11.13.01(Hy).
Parlange, M. B., Eichinger W. E. , and Albertson J. D. , 1995: Regional scale evaporation and the atmospheric boundary layer. Rev. Geophys., 33, 99–124, doi:10.1029/94RG03112.
Parmentier, F., Van der Molen M. , de Jeu R. , Hendriks D. , and Dolman A. , 2009: Fluxes and evaporation on a peatland in the Netherlands appear not affected by water table fluctuations. Agric. For. Meteor., 149, 1201–1208, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.007.
Penman, H. L., 1948: Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 193A, 120–145, doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0037.
Petrone, R. M., Price J. S. , Waddington J. , and Von Waldow H. , 2004: Surface moisture and energy exchange from a restored peatland, Québec, Canada. J. Hydrol., 295, 198–210, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.009.
Petrone, R. M., Silins U. , and Devito K. , 2007: Dynamics of evapotranspiration from a riparian pond complex in the western boreal forest, Alberta, Canada. Hydrol. Processes, 21, 1391–1401, doi:10.1002/hyp.6298.
Price, J. S., 1991: Evaporation from a blanket bog in a foggy coastal environment. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 57, 391–406, doi:10.1007/BF00120056.
Priestley, C., and Taylor R. , 1972: On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 100, 81–92, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2.
Raddatz, R., Papakyriakou T. , Swystun K. , and Tenuta M. , 2009: Evapotranspiration from a wetland tundra sedge fen: Surface resistance of peat for land-surface schemes. Agric. For. Meteor., 149, 851–861, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.003.
Reichstein, M., and Coauthors, 2005: On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: Review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biol., 11, 1424–1439, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x.
Roulet, N. T., Lafleur P. M. , Richard P. J. , Moore T. R. , Humphreys E. R. , and Bubier J. , 2007: Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland. Global Change Biol., 13, 397–411, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01292.x.
Runkle, B., Wille C. , Gažovič M. , Wilmking M. , and Kutzbach L. , 2014: The surface energy balance and its drivers in a boreal peatland fen of northwestern Russia. J. Hydrol., 511, 359–373, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.056.
Schwärzel, K., Renger M. , Sauerbrey R. , and Wessolek G. , 2002: Soil physical characteristics of peat soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 165, 479–486, doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<479::AID-JPLN479>3.0.CO;2-8.
Schwärzel, K., Šimůnek J. , van Genuchten M. T. , and Wessolek G. , 2006: Measurement modeling of soil-water dynamics evapotranspiration of drained peatland soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 169, 762–774, doi:10.1002/jpln.200621992.
Shimoyama, K., Hiyama T. , Fukushima Y. , and Inoue G. , 2004: Controls on evapotranspiration in a west Siberian bog. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D08111, doi:10.1029/2003JD004114.
Silins, U., and Rothwell R. L. , 1998: Forest peatland drainage and subsidence affect soil water retention and transport properties in an Alberta peatland. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 62, 1048–1056, doi:10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040028x.
Sonnentag, O., Van der Kamp G. , Barr A. , and Chen J. , 2010: On the relationship between water table depth and water vapor and carbon dioxide fluxes in a minerotrophic fen. Global Change Biol., 16, 1762–1776, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02032.x.
Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Springer, 670 pp.
Syed, K. H., Flanagan L. B. , Carlson P. J. , Glenn A. J. , and Van Gaalen K. E. , 2006: Environmental control of net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a treed, moderately rich fen in northern Alberta. Agric. For. Meteor., 140, 97–114, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.022.
Tanny, J., Cohen S. , Assouline S. , Lange F. , Grava A. , Berger D. , Teltch B. , and Parlange M. , 2008: Evaporation from a small water reservoir: Direct measurements and estimates. J. Hydrol., 351, 218–229, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.12.012.
Vercauteren, N., Bou-Zeid E. , Parlange M. B. , Lemmin U. , Huwald H. , Selker J. , and Meneveau C. , 2008: Subgrid-scale dynamics of water vapour, heat and momentum over a lake. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 128, 205–228, doi:10.1007/s10546-008-9287-9.
Verry, E., 1988: Hydrology of wetlands and man’s influence on it. Proc. of the Int. Symp. on the Hydrology of Wetlands in Temperate and Cold Regions, Vol. 2, Joensuu, Finland, Academy of Finland National IHP Committee, 41–61.
Weiss, R., Shurpali N. J. , Sallantaus T. , Laiho R. , Laine J. , and Alm J. , 2006: Simulation of water table level and peat temperatures in boreal peatlands. Ecol. Modell., 192, 441–456, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.016.
Williams, C. A., and Coauthors, 2012: Climate and vegetation controls on the surface water balance: Synthesis of evapotranspiration measured across a global network of flux towers. Water Resour. Res., 48, W06523, doi:10.1029/2011WR011586.
Wu, J., Kutzbach L. , Jager D. , Wille C. , and Wilmking M. , 2010: Evapotranspiration dynamics in a boreal peatland and its impact on the water and energy balance. J. Geophys. Res., 115, G04038, doi:10.1029/2009JG001075.