1. Introduction
The joint National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) core satellite was successfully launched on 28 February 2014. GPM is a constellation mission, whereby the observations and precipitation profile estimates from the core satellite dual-frequency (Ku and Ka band) precipitation radar (DPR) and 13-channel (10–183 GHz) passive microwave (PMW) GPM imager (GMI) act as a reference for the other constellation PMW-only satellites [e.g., the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2 (AMSR-2) onboard the Global Change Observation Mission–Water (GCOM-W) spacecraft, operated by JAXA; Hou et al. 2014].
With its 65° inclination, GPM observes more land surface area relative to the predecessor Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and associated extremes in seasonality, cold and snow-covered surfaces, inland water, and forest and vegetation. From space, the associated radar surface backscatter and the PMW surface emissivity signatures define the background state from which to carry out GPM precipitation retrievals from the radar and radiometer, respectively. Under nonraining conditions, the overland radar surface backscatter is highly variable, depending upon surface type and the viewing angle, which can impact the accuracy of path-integrated attenuation (PIA) radar retrieval methods (Meneghini and Jones 2011). At the center frequencies of the TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) and GMI, the land surface emissivity varies with soil moisture and, to a lesser degree, the soil texture and surface roughness. Soil moisture increases the dielectric constant of the soil and water mixture and thus decreases the surface emissivity; the surface roughness increases scattering and surface area, resulting in an increasing surface emissivity (Li et al. 2010). The combination of the varying land surface emissivity and the surface skin temperature typically produces a radiometric equivalent blackbody brightness temperature (TB) background that is difficult to contrast against the desired PMW signal owing to the precipitation (Munchak and Skofronick-Jackson 2013; Ferraro et al. 2013).
During the TRMM era, the PMW overland precipitation products were largely empirically based (Gopalan et al. 2010), relying upon the lower-frequency channels (i.e., 37 GHz and below) for discriminating the presence of precipitation and precipitation-sized hydrometeor-induced TB depressions at or near 85 GHz to quantify the precipitation rate. With GPM, the design of the PMW precipitation retrieval is a Bayesian-based estimation for all surfaces, whose veracity and accuracy relies upon the capability to physically model the multichannel TB of all scenes, and under all atmospheric conditions (Kummerow et al. 2011). A probabilistic Bayesian type of estimate is appropriate for inversion of profiling radar and/or radiometric observations of precipitation, since the space–time variability of the factors influencing the observations (e.g., the precipitation microphysics) is described by a very large number of nonindependent physical parameters, and the Bayesian solution inherently provides a measure of uncertainty. However, it does place a heavy burden on the capability to forward model the expected range of scenes with adequate realism, taking into account natural variability describing the precipitation media as well as the underlying surface, for building the a priori dataset (Petty 2013; L’Ecuyer and Stephens 2002). Slowly varying changes to the surface, such as seasonal variations in vegetation, can be captured by land surface classification techniques. A well-known example is the Tool to Estimate Land Surface Emissivities at Microwave Frequencies (TELSEM) passive microwave–based surface classification (Prigent et al. 2006; Aires et al. 2011), which provides a lookup table method to interpolate the emissivity mean and variance at a specified incidence angle and frequency, using a precalculated monthly mean emissivity climatology derived from the seven-channel (19–85 GHz) Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) observations. TELSEM has been successfully implemented into the current (as of March 2015, version 1) GPM radiometer algorithm (Kummerow et al. 2011), using a 15-class emissivity index to stratify the surface. With this algorithm, the Bayesian search is constrained to consider a priori candidate profiles that have the same classification index as the observation. In the radar case, the TRMM Precipitation Radar (PR) and GPM radar–based precipitation profile retrieval is improved with the surface reference technique (SRT; Meneghini et al. 2000) to establish the two-way path-integrated attenuation. The PIA estimation hinges upon estimation of the attenuation due to the presence of rain in the radar field of view, against the underlying natural normalized radar cross section (NRCS; typically denoted by
In this manuscript, we examine the feasibility of a more timely update to the surface state prior to each satellite overpass, which, together with knowledge of the associated variability in the multichannel emissivity and
Characterization of land surfaces by examining the imprint that rainfall leaves upon the associated PMW TB extends back to early studies with the SSM/I antecedent precipitation index (API) (Teng et al. 1993). More recently, C- and Ku-band scatterometer observations have been studied for estimating soil moisture (Mladenova et al. 2009), vegetation (Lu et al. 2013), detection of long periods of no precipitation for drought-monitoring indices (Nghiem et al. 2012), freeze–thaw conditions (Colliander et al. 2012) and snowmelt (Wang et al. 2008), and prior rainfall accumulations (Brocca et al. 2014). In particular, the wide-swath (1800 km), multiple-look pencil-beam scatterometer observations of the Ku-band, dual-beam OceanSat-2 scatterometer (OSCAT) are studied for their sensitivity to globally capturing and tracking short-period rain events. Active radar backscatter measurements are less sensitive to the surface temperature, but more affected by surface roughness and length scales, which change over longer time scales than the diurnally fluctuating surface temperature. Designed to capture small signals arising from ocean wind direction asymmetry, a scatterometer is by necessity very stable and well calibrated, to within tenths of a decibel (Bhowmick et al. 2014). There is a very wide body of work that has been done on radar backscattering over different surface types, and it is not the intent of this study to examine the physical modeling of vegetation canopies or soil properties.
The approach begins by first analyzing high-resolution (in space and time) ground radar precipitation products over the continental United States to examine the sensitivity of the joint TRMM radar surface backscatter and lower-frequency TMI surface emissivity under nonraining conditions as a function of the previous 3-hourly and longer (antecedent) rain accumulations and the PR incidence angle. This sensitivity study is needed to establish the magnitude of any displacement in the mean and covariance of these surface properties between scenes where no previous rainfall was noted, and those that experienced various amounts of rainfall. The hypothesis is made, similar to Turk et al. (2014a), that the surface variability that would be experienced during actual raining conditions is similar to the surface variability after a period antecedent precipitation. We are not attempting to estimate previous rainfall totals such as is done in Brocca et al. (2014) but rather to identify threshold conditions. A similar analysis is performed for the OSCAT backscatter cross sections during the same time period. It was noted that over certain surface types, a simple OSCAT time-change detection approach was capable of detecting locations that had experienced precipitation within the previous 3 h with a false alarm rate near 0.1 and detection rate near 0.8, with the veracity dropping over the more vegetated land surface classes. A practical use of this method would be the production of an ancillary, near-real-time updated previous-time precipitation map, which could be consulted by GPM and TRMM retrieval algorithms to adjust or modify the weighting of candidate solutions to better represent the most up-to-date surface conditions.
2. Description of datasets
The analyses will focus on OSCAT and TRMM PR and TMI for a 2-yr period (2010–11) over the continental United States. To capture the rapid time evolution of precipitation during the 24-h period just prior to each of these satellite overpasses, the high-refresh, time-coincident precipitation derived from NEXRAD data is used. In this section, we provide a brief description of each of these datasets.
a. OceanSat-2 over land
The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) OceanSat-2 spacecraft was launched on 23 September 2009 from the Satish Dhawan Space Center in southeastern India. OceanSat-2 orbits with a local time on ascending node (LTAN) of 1200 local time ±10 min and ground tracks have a controlled revisit track pattern repeating every two days, in order to allow frequent observations from the Ocean Color Monitor (OCM) under similar solar illumination conditions. The OceanSat-2 Ku-band (13.5 GHz) scatterometer payload successfully operated from 29 September 2009 to 20 February 2014. OSCAT is a conically scanning, pencil-beam scatterometer whose primary task is the estimation of ocean surface wind vectors (Gohil et al. 2013). Its dual-beam, conically scanning antenna system is very similar to the two NASA SeaWinds scatterometers, the first of which operated in tandem with the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer onboard the Advanced Earth Observing Satellite (ADEOS) spacecraft for eight months during 2003. The second SeaWinds was the sole payload onboard the QuikSCAT spacecraft, which operated from 19 July 1999 to 21 November 2009, allowing a brief two-month overlap between QuikSCAT and OSCAT. The OSCAT viewing geometry is illustrated in Fig. 1. The inner (outer) beam transmits and receives at horizontal H (vertical V) polarization with a 48.9° (57.6°) Earth incidence angle. The OSCAT level-1 product reports the inner and outer scan

Depiction of the OSCAT dual-beam conical scanning. The horizontal-polarized inner (vertical-polarized outer) beam provides an Earth incidence angle of 48.9° (57.6°) from nadir, with an 1820 (1400)-km swath width. The ISRO level 1B datasets contain 282 outer beam footprint aggregated grid cells (281 for inner beam), spaced by ~15 km across and along track. Figure courtesy of ISRO.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

Depiction of the OSCAT dual-beam conical scanning. The horizontal-polarized inner (vertical-polarized outer) beam provides an Earth incidence angle of 48.9° (57.6°) from nadir, with an 1820 (1400)-km swath width. The ISRO level 1B datasets contain 282 outer beam footprint aggregated grid cells (281 for inner beam), spaced by ~15 km across and along track. Figure courtesy of ISRO.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Depiction of the OSCAT dual-beam conical scanning. The horizontal-polarized inner (vertical-polarized outer) beam provides an Earth incidence angle of 48.9° (57.6°) from nadir, with an 1820 (1400)-km swath width. The ISRO level 1B datasets contain 282 outer beam footprint aggregated grid cells (281 for inner beam), spaced by ~15 km across and along track. Figure courtesy of ISRO.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
During 2010–11, approximately 5 million (M) ascending and 5M descending nonraining OSCAT footprint pixels were gathered over the continental United States (CONUS) from the inner swath region, where all four azimuthal views were available. A unique benefit of OSCAT is the relative stability of the four azimuthal viewing directions, which will be further explained below when these data are analyzed over land.
b. TRMM PR and TMI observations over land
The TRMM Precipitation Radar operates at Ku-band (13.8 GHz), with an electronically controlled cross-track scan encompassing 245 km (from the 405-km altitude after the 2001 orbit boost), as the PR scans its ±18° swath. Across this swath, the radar processor apportions the received power at 49 beam positions, covering 25 [i.e., (49 − 1)/2 + 1] unique viewing angles ranging from near nadir to 18°, each approximately 4 km × 4 km resolution. The companion passive microwave radiometer for PR is the TRMM Microwave Imager, which provides equivalent blackbody brightness temperatures at nine channels between 10 and 85 GHz in a conically scanning mode, covering an 830-km swath, with on-Earth resolutions ranging from 72 km × 43 km at 10.7 GHz to 8 km × 6 km at 85.5 GHz. To account for the on-Earth resolution difference between the PR and TMI fields of view, the matched PR–TMI dataset procedure averages the PR radar beams in a 3 × 3 region centered at each TMI sample location, within the coincident PR swath. Since this analysis only considers nonraining scenes, this simplified averaging was assumed as a first-order adjustment for the on-Earth sensor resolution differences. The maximum latitude achieved by the PR limits the land area for this study, and the 2-yr analysis period (2010–11) provides a sufficient number of overpasses over the southern United States below 35°N latitude, where continuous ground-based radar coverage from the operational NEXRAD network is available.
c. NEXRAD precipitation mosaic
To analyze the subdaily precipitation time history prior to each overpass within the CONUS, two products from the National Mosaic and Multi-Sensor Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (NMQ) radar product (Zhang et al. 2011) were used: a 0.01° precipitation rate updated every 5 minutes over the CONUS land areas and an hourly accumulated precipitation product. The former was used to identify the precipitation conditions at the time (within 5 min) of each OSCAT overpass during 2010–11 to identify nonraining OSCAT scenes. For the nonraining pixels in each scene, the hourly NMQ products were backward time-integrated to obtain the accumulated precipitation at seven intervals (1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h). For TRMM overpasses over the CONUS during these same two years, the accumulated precipitation at these same five intervals were added to each nonraining PR–TMI pixel (nonraining conditions directly inferred from the PR itself). This common reference precipitation dataset enables a self-consistent analysis to be carried out between the OSCAT and PR–TMI observations and any previous rainfall.
3. Response of PR–TMI to previous-time precipitation
A number of recent studies have highlighted the geographical variability in PR surface backscatter (Meneghini et al. 2000, 2004; Seto and Iguchi 2007) and the multichannel microwave surface emissivity (Turk et al. 2014b; Norouzi et al. 2012). Seto and Iguchi (2007) noted that the TRMM PR
The TRMM PR

Map of the TRMM PR land surface classification (Durden et al. 2012) over the southern portion of the continental United States covered by the TRMM radar.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

Map of the TRMM PR land surface classification (Durden et al. 2012) over the southern portion of the continental United States covered by the TRMM radar.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Map of the TRMM PR land surface classification (Durden et al. 2012) over the southern portion of the continental United States covered by the TRMM radar.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

As in Fig. 2, but for continental South America.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

As in Fig. 2, but for continental South America.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
As in Fig. 2, but for continental South America.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
The merged PR–TMI dataset was separated by each of the land classes to examine the magnitude of the joint change of the PR surface backscatter

Histogram of the PR backscatter cross section for land classes (left) 4 and (right) 8, for four different PR zenith angles ranges (0°–4°, 4°–8°, 8°–12°, and 12°–18°), over the southern United States covered by the TRMM PR, for all TRMM overpasses during 2010 and 2011, under nonraining conditions (PR = 0). The line colors indicate various NMQ-observed antecedent precipitation conditions. Black line: all PR = 0 scenes; red line: scenes where NMQ observes >10 mm accumulated rain during the previous 3 h; magenta line: scenes where NMQ observes >25 mm accumulated rain during the previous 24 h; green line: scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 24 h; and blue line: scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 72 h.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

Histogram of the PR backscatter cross section for land classes (left) 4 and (right) 8, for four different PR zenith angles ranges (0°–4°, 4°–8°, 8°–12°, and 12°–18°), over the southern United States covered by the TRMM PR, for all TRMM overpasses during 2010 and 2011, under nonraining conditions (PR = 0). The line colors indicate various NMQ-observed antecedent precipitation conditions. Black line: all PR = 0 scenes; red line: scenes where NMQ observes >10 mm accumulated rain during the previous 3 h; magenta line: scenes where NMQ observes >25 mm accumulated rain during the previous 24 h; green line: scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 24 h; and blue line: scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 72 h.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Histogram of the PR backscatter cross section for land classes (left) 4 and (right) 8, for four different PR zenith angles ranges (0°–4°, 4°–8°, 8°–12°, and 12°–18°), over the southern United States covered by the TRMM PR, for all TRMM overpasses during 2010 and 2011, under nonraining conditions (PR = 0). The line colors indicate various NMQ-observed antecedent precipitation conditions. Black line: all PR = 0 scenes; red line: scenes where NMQ observes >10 mm accumulated rain during the previous 3 h; magenta line: scenes where NMQ observes >25 mm accumulated rain during the previous 24 h; green line: scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 24 h; and blue line: scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 72 h.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
For land class 4, and near-nadir observations (PR zenith 0°–4°),
Figures 5 and 6 (land classes 4 and 8, respectively) depict results from these same experiments, but the joint variability between PR Ku-band

Joint 2D histogram of the TMI 10H-GHz surface emissivity and the PR backscatter cross section for land class 4, and four different PR zenith angles ranges (0°–4°, 4°–8°, 8°–12°, and 12°–18°), under nonraining conditions over the southern United States covered by the TRMM radar, for all TRMM overpasses during 2010 and 2011. (left) Scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 24 h. (right) Scenes where NMQ observes >25 mm accumulated rain during the previous 24 h.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

Joint 2D histogram of the TMI 10H-GHz surface emissivity and the PR backscatter cross section for land class 4, and four different PR zenith angles ranges (0°–4°, 4°–8°, 8°–12°, and 12°–18°), under nonraining conditions over the southern United States covered by the TRMM radar, for all TRMM overpasses during 2010 and 2011. (left) Scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 24 h. (right) Scenes where NMQ observes >25 mm accumulated rain during the previous 24 h.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Joint 2D histogram of the TMI 10H-GHz surface emissivity and the PR backscatter cross section for land class 4, and four different PR zenith angles ranges (0°–4°, 4°–8°, 8°–12°, and 12°–18°), under nonraining conditions over the southern United States covered by the TRMM radar, for all TRMM overpasses during 2010 and 2011. (left) Scenes where NMQ = 0 during the previous 24 h. (right) Scenes where NMQ observes >25 mm accumulated rain during the previous 24 h.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

As in Fig. 5, but for TRMM land class 8.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

As in Fig. 5, but for TRMM land class 8.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
As in Fig. 5, but for TRMM land class 8.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Since the natural variability of the nonraining PR
4. OSCAT surface backscatter and time change
In this section, the ability of OSCAT observations to indicate the occurrence and amount of previous-time precipitation is studied using the same TRMM surface classes and NMQ analyses as section 3.
Figure 7 illustrates the OSCAT

OSCAT footprint
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

OSCAT footprint
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
OSCAT footprint
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
To demonstrate the

Time series of each OSCAT overpass
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

Time series of each OSCAT overpass
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Time series of each OSCAT overpass
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
a. Establishing the daily background
The relationship between the radar
A previous-time history of all OSCAT data was prepared for each box on a 0.2° latitude–longitude grid. Judging by the time history effect arising from precipitation events in Fig. 8 (bottom), a 15-day moving median filter was independently applied to each of the four

(top) Maps of the OSCAT 15-day median filtered background values (dB), for the (left) inner and (right) outer beams for 3 Mar 2011. (bottom) As in (top), but for 1 Aug 2011.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

(top) Maps of the OSCAT 15-day median filtered background values (dB), for the (left) inner and (right) outer beams for 3 Mar 2011. (bottom) As in (top), but for 1 Aug 2011.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
(top) Maps of the OSCAT 15-day median filtered background values (dB), for the (left) inner and (right) outer beams for 3 Mar 2011. (bottom) As in (top), but for 1 Aug 2011.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
The application of these daily background datasets to the overpass of Fig. 7 is demonstrated in Fig. 10. Since OSCAT does not carry a companion radar, the nearest 5-min rain rate (mm h−1) from the NEXRAD NMQ analysis is shown in Fig. 10 (top left) to determine the precipitation during each OSCAT overpass. Figure 10 (top right) and Fig. 10 (middle left) depict the NMQ accumulations (mm) during the 6 and 24 h prior to the OSCAT overpass, respectively. The regions of enhanced

(top left) Nearest 5-min rain rate from NEXRAD NMQ during the OSCAT overpass shown in Fig. 7. (top right) NMQ accumulations during the 6 h prior to the OSCAT overpass. (middle left) NMQ accumulations during the 24 h prior to the OSCAT overpass. (middle right) Outer beam
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

(top left) Nearest 5-min rain rate from NEXRAD NMQ during the OSCAT overpass shown in Fig. 7. (top right) NMQ accumulations during the 6 h prior to the OSCAT overpass. (middle left) NMQ accumulations during the 24 h prior to the OSCAT overpass. (middle right) Outer beam
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
(top left) Nearest 5-min rain rate from NEXRAD NMQ during the OSCAT overpass shown in Fig. 7. (top right) NMQ accumulations during the 6 h prior to the OSCAT overpass. (middle left) NMQ accumulations during the 24 h prior to the OSCAT overpass. (middle right) Outer beam
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Using
b. Overall detection performance statistics
The previous example was designed to illustrate the regions and conditions whereby the relative change in the OSCAT

Histograms (left y axis) and CDFs (right y axis) of the residual (observed-minus-background)
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

Histograms (left y axis) and CDFs (right y axis) of the residual (observed-minus-background)
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Histograms (left y axis) and CDFs (right y axis) of the residual (observed-minus-background)
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
Figure 12 shows these same analyses, but only for land classes 4 (solid lines) and 8 (dotted lines). Similar to the PR analyses shown in Fig. 4, the shift in the residual

CDFs of the residual (observed-minus-background) (dB) for all nonraining OSCAT overpasses during 2010–11 over the CONUS for land classes 4 and 8. The layout and color scale is the same as Fig. 11. Solid (dotted) lines indicate land class 4 (land class 8).
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

CDFs of the residual (observed-minus-background) (dB) for all nonraining OSCAT overpasses during 2010–11 over the CONUS for land classes 4 and 8. The layout and color scale is the same as Fig. 11. Solid (dotted) lines indicate land class 4 (land class 8).
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
CDFs of the residual (observed-minus-background) (dB) for all nonraining OSCAT overpasses during 2010–11 over the CONUS for land classes 4 and 8. The layout and color scale is the same as Fig. 11. Solid (dotted) lines indicate land class 4 (land class 8).
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
For the inner swath region, and scenes where all four observations were available at each overpass, a simple linear discriminant was applied to the collection of four residual

(left) Histogram of the four-element discriminant value. The black line represents the discriminant value calculated for all OSCAT cells where the NMQ radar analysis indicated no rain in the previous 24 h. The red line represents the discriminant value for all OSCAT cells where the NMQ radar analysis indicated more than 10 mm of accumulated rainfall in the 3 h prior to the overpass. (right) Corresponding ROC curve, plotted separately for land classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1

(left) Histogram of the four-element discriminant value. The black line represents the discriminant value calculated for all OSCAT cells where the NMQ radar analysis indicated no rain in the previous 24 h. The red line represents the discriminant value for all OSCAT cells where the NMQ radar analysis indicated more than 10 mm of accumulated rainfall in the 3 h prior to the overpass. (right) Corresponding ROC curve, plotted separately for land classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
(left) Histogram of the four-element discriminant value. The black line represents the discriminant value calculated for all OSCAT cells where the NMQ radar analysis indicated no rain in the previous 24 h. The red line represents the discriminant value for all OSCAT cells where the NMQ radar analysis indicated more than 10 mm of accumulated rainfall in the 3 h prior to the overpass. (right) Corresponding ROC curve, plotted separately for land classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8.
Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 16, 6; 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0046.1
5. Conclusions
In this study, a 2-yr set of radar backscatter cross-sectional observations from the Ku-band, dual-beam OceanSat-2 scatterometer (OSCAT) were examined for their capability to track dynamic surface changes owing to previous-time (antecedent) precipitation. The tightly maintained OSCAT ground repeat track pattern maintains nearly constant azimuthal viewing directions for the inner fore, inner aft, outer fore, and outer aft viewing directions for each ascending or descending overpass. An eight-class surface classification derived from the zenith variability in the TRMM Precipitation Radar (PR) surface backscatter cross-sectional
Over certain classes, it was shown that a time-change detection approach, based on a daily updated OSCAT
The analysis was done largely from a qualitative method, the rationale being that it is important to first identify and quantify the response of the surface to the precipitation, from the observations themselves, before moving forward into more detailed physical surface modeling and forward simulations. Many choices were not fully explored, such as the moving average median filtering and further discretization of the spatial and time scales of the previous rain accumulations, and no attempt was made to assign physical meanings to the land surface classes.
While not investigated, this type of analysis is applicable to observations from the recently activated (October 2014) Rapid Scatterometer (RapidScat) onboard the International Space Station, to apply to overland precipitation retrievals from the GMI and/or DPR sensors, thereby maintaining continuity between the 17+-yr TRMM data record and GPM.
Acknowledgments
This work was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. OceanSat-2 data were provided courtesy of the Indian Space Research Organisation, and TRMM data via the NASA Precipitation Processing System (PPS). FJT and SD acknowledge support from the NASA Precipitation Measuring Mission (PMM) science team.
REFERENCES
Aires, F., Prigent C. , Bernardo F. , Jiménez C. , Saunders R. , and Brunel P. , 2011: A Tool to Estimate Land-Surface Emissivities at Microwave frequencies (TELSEM) for use in numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 690–699, doi:10.1002/qj.803.
Bartalis, Z., Scipal K. , and Wagner W. , 2006: Azimuthal anisotropy of scatterometer measurements over land. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 2083–2092, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2006.872084.
Bhowmick, S. A., Kumar R. , and Kumar A. S. K. , 2014: Cross calibration of the OceanSAT-2 scatterometer with QuikSCAT scatterometer using natural terrestrial targets. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 52, 3393–3398, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2272738.
Brocca, L., and Coauthors, 2014: Soil as a natural rain gauge: Estimating global rainfall from satellite soil moisture data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 5128–5141, doi:10.1002/2014JD021489.
Colliander, A., McDonald K. , Zimmermann R. , Schroeder R. , Kimball J. S. , and Njoku E. G. , 2012: Application of QuikSCAT backscatter to SMAP validation planning: Freeze/thaw state over ALECTRA sites in Alaska from 2000 to 2007. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 50, 461–468, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2174368.
Durden, S. L., Tanelli S. , and Meneghini R. , 2012: Using surface classification to improve surface reference technique performance over land. Indian J. Radio Space Phys., 41, 403–410.
Ferraro, R. R., and Coauthors, 2013: An evaluation of microwave land surface emissivities over the continental United States to benefit GPM-era precipitation algorithms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 51, 378–398, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2199121.
Glenn, E. P., Huete A. R. , Nagler P. L. , and Nelson S. G. , 2008: Relationship between remotely-sensed vegetation indices, canopy attributes and plant physiological processes: What vegetation indices can and cannot tell us about the landscape. Sensors, 8, 2136–2160, doi:10.3390/s8042136.
Gohil, B. S., Gairola R. M. , Mathur A. K. , Varma A. K. , Mahesh C. , Gangwar R. K. , and Pal P. K. , 2013: Algorithms for retrieving geophysical parameters from the MADRAS and SAPHIR sensors of the Megha-Tropiques satellite: Indian scenario. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 954–963, doi:10.1002/qj.2041.
Gopalan, K., Wang N. Y. , Ferraro R. , and Liu C. , 2010: Status of the TRMM 2A12 land precipitation algorithm. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 1343–1354, doi:10.1175/2010JTECHA1454.1.
Hou, A. Y., and Coauthors, 2014: The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 701–722, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1.
Huang, S., Tsang L. , Njoku E. G. , and Chan K. S. , 2010: Backscattering coefficients, coherent reflectivities, and emissivities of randomly rough soil surfaces at L-band for SMAP applications based on numerical solutions of Maxwell equations in three-dimensional simulations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 48, 2557–2568, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2040748.
Hunt, E. R., Li L. , Yilmaz M. T. , and Jackson T. J. , 2011: Comparison of vegetation water contents derived from shortwave-infrared and passive-microwave sensors over central Iowa. Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 2376–2383, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.04.037.
Kimball, J. S., McDonald K. C. , Running S. W. , and Frolking S. E. , 2004: Satellite radar remote sensing of seasonal growing seasons for boreal and subalpine evergreen forests. Remote Sens. Environ., 90, 243–258, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.01.002.
Kummerow, C. D., Ringerud S. , Crook J. , Randel D. , and Berg W. , 2011: An observationally generated a priori database for microwave rainfall retrievals. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 28, 113–130, doi:10.1175/2010JTECHA1468.1.
L’Ecuyer, T. S., and Stephens G. L. , 2002: An uncertainty model for Bayesian Monte Carlo retrieval algorithms: Application to the TRMM observing system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 1713–1737, doi:10.1002/qj.200212858316.
Li, L., and Coauthors, 2010: WindSat global soil moisture retrieval and validation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 48, 2224–2241, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2009.2037749.
Lu, L., Guo H. , Wang C. , and Li Q. , 2013: Assessment of the SeaWinds scatterometer for vegetation phenology monitoring across China. Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 5551–5568, doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.794986.
Meneghini, R., and Jones J. A. , 2011: Standard deviation of spatially averaged surface cross section data from the TRMM Precipitation Radar. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 8, 293–297, doi:10.1109/LGRS.2010.2064755.
Meneghini, R., Iguchi T. , Kozu T. , Liao L. , Okamoto K. , Jones J. A. , and Kwiatkowski J. , 2000: Use of the surface reference technique for path attenuation estimates from the TRMM Precipitation Radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 2053–2070, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2053:UOTSRT>2.0.CO;2.
Meneghini, R., Jones J. A. , Iguchi T. , Okamoto K. , and Kwiatkowski J. , 2004: A hybrid surface reference technique and its application to the TRMM Precipitation Radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 1645–1658, doi:10.1175/JTECH1664.1.
Mladenova, I., Lakshmi V. , Walker J. P. , Long D. G. , and De Jeu R. , 2009: An assessment of QuikSCAT Ku-band scatterometer data for soil moisture sensitivity. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 6, 640–643, doi:10.1109/LGRS.2009.2021492.
Munchak, S. J., and Skofronick-Jackson G. , 2013: Evaluation of precipitation detection over various surfaces from passive microwave imagers and sounders. Atmos. Res., 131, 81–94, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.10.011.
Nghiem, S., Wardlow B. D. , Allured D. , Svoboda M. D. , LeComte D. , Rosencrans M. , Chan S. , and Neumann G. , 2012: Microwave remote sensing of soil moisture: Science and applications. Microwave Remote Sensing of Drought: Innovative Monitoring Approaches, B. D. Wardlow, M. C. Anderson, and J. P. Verdin, Eds., CRC Press, 197–226.
Norouzi, H., Rossow W. , Temimi M. , Prigent C. , Azarderakhsh M. , Boukabara S. , and Khanbilvardi R. , 2012: Using microwave brightness temperature diurnal cycle to improve emissivity retrievals over land. Remote Sens. Environ., 123, 470–482, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.015.
Petty, G. W., 2013: Dimensionality reduction in Bayesian estimation algorithms. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 6, 2327–2352, doi:10.5194/amtd-6-2327-2013.
Prigent, C., Aires F. , and Rossow W. B. , 2006: Land surface microwave emissivities over the globe for a decade. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 1573–1584, doi:10.1175/BAMS-87-11-1573.
Puri, S., Stephen H. , and Ahmad S. , 2011: Relating TRMM Precipitation Radar backscatter to water stage in wetlands. J. Hydrol., 401, 240–249, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.026.
Ringerud, S., Kummerow C. , Peters-Lidard C. , Tian Y. , and Harrison K. , 2014: A comparison of microwave window channel retrieved and forward-modeled emissivities over the U.S. southern Great Plains. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 52, 2395–2412, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2260759.
Seto, S., and Iguchi T. , 2007: Rainfall-induced changes in actual surface backscattering cross sections and effects on rain-rate estimates by spaceborne precipitation radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 1693–1709, doi:10.1175/JTECH2088.1.
Stephen, H., Ahmad S. , Piechota T. C. , and Tang C. , 2010: Relating surface backscatter response from TRMM Precipitation Radar to soil moisture: Results over a semi-arid region. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 193–204, doi:10.5194/hess-14-193-2010.
Teng, W. L., Wang J. R. , and Doraiswamy P. C. , 1993: Relationship between satellite microwave radiometric data, antecedent precipitation index, and regional soil moisture. Int. J. Remote Sens., 14, 2483–2500, doi:10.1080/01431169308904287.
Turk, F. J., Haddad Z. S. , and You Y. , 2014a: Principal components of multifrequency microwave land surface emissivities. Part I: Estimation under clear and precipitating conditions. J. Hydrometeor., 15, 3–19, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-08.1.
Turk, F. J., Li L. , and Haddad Z. S. , 2014b: A physically based soil moisture and microwave emissivity data set for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) applications. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 52, 7637–7650, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2014.2315809.
Wagner, W., Lemoine G. , Borgeaud M. , and Rott H. , 1999: A study of vegetation cover effects on ERS scatterometer data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 37, 938–948, doi:10.1109/36.752212.
Wang, L., Derksen C. , and Brown R. , 2008: Detection of pan-Arctic terrestrial snowmelt from QuikSCAT, 2000–2005. Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 3794–3805, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.05.017.
Wilks, D. S., 2011: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. 3rd ed. Elsevier, 676 pp.
Yilmaz, M. T., Hunt E. R. , and Jackson T. J. , 2008: Remote sensing of vegetation water content from equivalent water thickness using satellite imagery. Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 2514–2522, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.11.014.
Zhang, J., and Coauthors, 2011: National Mosaic and Multi-Sensor QPE (NMQ) system: Description, results, and future plans. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1321–1338, doi:10.1175/2011BAMS-D-11-00047.1.