CORRIGENDUM

Atsuhiro Takahashi Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

Search for other papers by Atsuhiro Takahashi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tomo’omi Kumagai Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, and Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for other papers by Tomo’omi Kumagai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hironari Kanamori Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

Search for other papers by Hironari Kanamori in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hatsuki Fujinami Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

Search for other papers by Hatsuki Fujinami in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tetsuya Hiyama Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

Search for other papers by Tetsuya Hiyama in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Masayuki Hara Center for Environmental Science in Saitama, Kazo, Saitama, Japan

Search for other papers by Masayuki Hara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Masayuki Hara, hara.masayuki@pref.saitama.lg.jp

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Masayuki Hara, hara.masayuki@pref.saitama.lg.jp

In Takahashi et al. (2017), we have noticed a mistake in Fig. 10. The legend for dP and dE embedded in Fig. 10a was incorrect, which had a large impact on the interpretation of the figure. The corrected figure appears below. We regret any inconvenience this may have caused.

Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.

Differences in evapotranspiration dE, precipitation dP, sensible heat flux dSHF, horizontal wind velocity dU, horizontal water vapor flux divergence dQdiv, and convective available potential energy dCAPE between each experiment (0.2Gcmax, Barren-1, and Barren-2) and Control. The dCAPE, dQdiv, and dU were simulated at 850 hPa. (a) Direct effect due to the simulation setup, that is, dE, dP, dSHF. (b) Effect of feedback processes, that is dU, dQdiv, and dCAPE. The error bars indicate standard errors calculated from the day-to-day variability.

Citation: Journal of Hydrometeorology 20, 3; 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0183.1

REFERENCE

Takahashi, A., T. Kumagai, H. Kanamori, H. Fujinami, T. Hiyama, and M. Hara, 2017: Impact of tropical deforestation and forest degradation on precipitation over Borneo Island. J. Hydrometeor., 18, 29072922, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0008.1.

  • Crossref
  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation
Save
  • Takahashi, A., T. Kumagai, H. Kanamori, H. Fujinami, T. Hiyama, and M. Hara, 2017: Impact of tropical deforestation and forest degradation on precipitation over Borneo Island. J. Hydrometeor., 18, 29072922, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0008.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fig. 10.

    Differences in evapotranspiration dE, precipitation dP, sensible heat flux dSHF, horizontal wind velocity dU, horizontal water vapor flux divergence dQdiv, and convective available potential energy dCAPE between each experiment (0.2Gcmax, Barren-1, and Barren-2) and Control. The dCAPE, dQdiv, and dU were simulated at 850 hPa. (a) Direct effect due to the simulation setup, that is, dE, dP, dSHF. (b) Effect of feedback processes, that is dU, dQdiv, and dCAPE. The error bars indicate standard errors calculated from the day-to-day variability.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 184 83 10
PDF Downloads 95 23 1