Implicit Differencing of Predictive Equations of the Boundary Layer

Jan Paegle Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112

Search for other papers by Jan Paegle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wilford G. Zdunkowski Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112

Search for other papers by Wilford G. Zdunkowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ronald M. Welch Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112

Search for other papers by Ronald M. Welch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

The Crank-Nicholson method may not give useful results in detailed prediction of the thermal planetary boundary layer unless tune steps on the order of 10 s are used. In similar problems, lower order time differencing methods give reasonable results with time steps as large as 300 s. The reason for the superior behavior of the lower order schemes relative to straightforward application of the Crank-Nicholson technique is due to a better treatment of short waves which appear to be critically important in nonlinear terms.

Abstract

The Crank-Nicholson method may not give useful results in detailed prediction of the thermal planetary boundary layer unless tune steps on the order of 10 s are used. In similar problems, lower order time differencing methods give reasonable results with time steps as large as 300 s. The reason for the superior behavior of the lower order schemes relative to straightforward application of the Crank-Nicholson technique is due to a better treatment of short waves which appear to be critically important in nonlinear terms.

Save