All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 77 41 0
PDF Downloads 10 7 1

Random Errors of Oceanic Monthly Rainfall Derived from SSM/I Using Probability Distribution Functions

Alfred T. C. ChangHydrological Sciences, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Alfred T. C. Chang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Long S. ChiuGeneral Sciences Corporation, Laurel, Maryland

Search for other papers by Long S. Chiu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Thomas T. WilheitMeteorology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Search for other papers by Thomas T. Wilheit in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

Global averages and random errors associated with the monthly oceanic rain rates derived from the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) data using the technique developed by Wilheit et al. are computed. Accounting for the beam-filling bias, a global annual average rain rate of 1.26 m is computed. The error estimation scheme is based on the existence of independent (morning and afternoon) estimates of the monthly mean. Calculations show overall random errors of about 50%–60% for each 5° × 5° box. The results are insensitive to different sampling strategy (odd and even days of the month). Comparison of the SSM/I estimates with raingage data collected at the Pacific atoll stations showed a low bias of about 8%, a correlation of 0.7, and an rms difference of 55%.

Abstract

Global averages and random errors associated with the monthly oceanic rain rates derived from the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) data using the technique developed by Wilheit et al. are computed. Accounting for the beam-filling bias, a global annual average rain rate of 1.26 m is computed. The error estimation scheme is based on the existence of independent (morning and afternoon) estimates of the monthly mean. Calculations show overall random errors of about 50%–60% for each 5° × 5° box. The results are insensitive to different sampling strategy (odd and even days of the month). Comparison of the SSM/I estimates with raingage data collected at the Pacific atoll stations showed a low bias of about 8%, a correlation of 0.7, and an rms difference of 55%.

Save