1. Introduction
The intensification of extratropical cyclones by atmospheric heating (either diabatic heating or temperature advection) has been demonstrated in many model studies (see, e.g., Pauley and Smith 1988; Kuo and Reed 1988; Reed et al. 1988; Manobianco 1989; Kuo and Low-Nam 1990; Uccellini 1990; Kuo et al. 1991) and diagnostic studies (see, e.g., Tracton 1973; Gyakum 1983a,b; Davis and Emanuel 1988; Roebber 1989; Hirschberg and Fritsch 1991a,b; Jusem and Atlas 1991;Lupo et al. 1992; Rolfson and Smith 1996).
Clearly, the extent to which cyclones respond to such heating depends on the magnitude of the heating itself. Further, it has been shown, again with both model and diagnostic analyses (Anthes and Keyser 1979; Hirschberg and Fritsch 1991a,b; Steenburgh and Holton 1993;Rausch and Smith 1996), that the response to heating depends on its vertical distribution.
A question that to the author’s knowledge has received little attention to date is the sensitivity of the surface response to the horizontal heating distribution. The objective of this note is to explore this latter aspect of the heating–cyclogenesis relationship. The methodology used is to represent the horizontal heating distribution as a set of simple analytic functions and then to examine the sensitivity of the surface geostrophic vorticity tendency to these functions.
2. Background discussion
3. Analytic diagnosis
4. Results
Figure 2 shows that the inferred surface geostrophic vorticity tendency is quite sensitive to the horizontal heating distribution. The responses to F1 and F2 are positive (positive values of G1 and G2) throughout the domain. However, while G1 and G2 are of similar magnitude in the domain interior, they differ markedly in the exterior regions, despite the fact that F1 and F2 themselves are quite similar throughout. Comparing G1 and G2 with G3 reveals the most striking difference of all, the sign change that occurs in G3 at Lx/8 and 3Lx/8, thus rendering the response to F3 of opposite sign to that of F1 and F2 in the exterior regions.
Physically, these results can be explained by first realizing that in order to produce a surface geostrophic vorticity change, ∇2(TC), or Fn, must force horizontal divergence. In turn, since the second-order derivative of Fn is proportional to the horizontal divergence, the first derivative at any point on Fn (slope of Fn) must be proportional to the divergent component of the flow induced by Fn. For F1 and F2, the slope maximizes at the outer limits 0 and Lx/2 and decreases monotonically to zero at the midpoint Lx/4. Thus, although of different magnitude, both exhibit divergent flow throughout the domain. In contrast, for F3 the slope maximizes in the interior of the domain at the inflection points (Lx/8 and 3Lx/8) and then decreases monotonically to zero at both the midpoint and the outer limits. Thus, divergent (convergent) flow occurs inside (outside) the inflection points.
5. Discussion
In the context of cyclone development, the preceding results have important implications. They suggest that if the cyclone is located relatively near the heating maximum, one can expect the heating to intensify the cyclone regardless of the heating distribution, although the vigor of that development would be distribution sensitive. On the other hand, when the cyclone center is further removed from the heating maximum, both the vigor and the sign of the development would be distribution sensitive. In some cases, heating could actually weaken the cyclone. This result appears to be consistent with the results of Montgomery and Enagonio (1998), who found that, for a simulated tropical cyclone, convection placed near (far from) the cyclone center yielded significantly increased (slightly decreased) maximum mean tangential winds.
An examination of the composite cyclone diagnosis of Rolfson and Smith (1996) provides a measure of verification of a portion of these results. Examination of their Fig. 10 reveals moderate levels of latent heat release during each of the three cyclone development phases, and relatively small latent heating for weakening cyclone cases. The average geostrophic vorticity tendency response to these heating fields is given in Rolfson and Smith’s Fig. 7. In the three development phases, the heating yields the expected vorticity increase, while in the weakening phase the heating yields a vorticity decrease. Although the position of the heating maxima and the horizontal distributions of the heating are not known in these cases, these results confirm that positive heating fields can indeed result in cyclone weakening.
Finally, it is clear that the present results do not comment on the atmospheric response to more complex one-, two-, or three-dimensional TC distributions, nor on the many interactions and feedbacks that conspire to produce surface geostrophic vorticity changes. Even in these more complex scenarios, the Laplacian operator in (1) dictates a sensitivity to horizontal distribution that has heretofore received little attention in the scientific literature. The purpose of this paper has been to provide a simple demonstration of how profound that sensitivity can be.
Acknowledgments
This work was inspired by the M.S. thesis of Ms. Judy St-James and by discussions with her major professor, Dr. Peter Zwack, at the University of Québec at Montréal.
REFERENCES
Anthes, R. A., and D. Keyser, 1979: Test of a fine-mesh model over Europe and the United States. Mon. Wea. Rev.,107, 963–984.
Davis, C. A., and K. A. Emanuel, 1988: Observational evidence for the influence of surface heat fluxes on rapid maritime cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2649–2659.
Gyakum, J. R., 1983a: On the evolution of the QE II storm. Part I: Synoptic aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 1137–1155.
——, 1983b: On the evolution of the QE II storm. Part II: Dynamic and thermodynamic structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 1156–1173.
Hirschberg, P. A., and J. M. Fritsch, 1991a: Tropopause undulations and the development of extratropical cyclones. Part I: Overview and observations from a cyclone event. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 496–517.
——, and ——, 1991b: Tropopause undulations and the development of extratropical cyclones. Part II: Diagnostic analysis and conceptual model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 518–550.
Jusem, J. C., and R. Atlas, 1991: Diagnostic evaluation of numerical model simulations using the tendency equation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 2936–2955.
Kuo, Y. H., and R. J. Reed, 1988: Numerical simulation of an explosively deepening cyclone in the eastern Pacific. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2081–2105.
——, and S. Low-Nam, 1990: Prediction of nine explosive cyclones over the western Atlantic Ocean with a regional model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 3–25.
——, R. J. Reed, and S. Low-Nam, 1991: Effects of surface energy fluxes during the early development and rapid intensification stages of seven explosive cyclones in the western Atlantic. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 457–476.
Lupo, A. R., P. J. Smith, and P. Zwack, 1992: A diagnosis of the explosive development of two extratropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 1490–1523.
Manobianco, J., 1989: Explosive east coast cyclogenesis: Numerical experimentation and model-based diagnostics. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2384–2405.
Montgomery, M. T., and J. Enagonio, 1998: Tropical cyclogenesis via convectively forced vortex Rossby waves in a three-dimensional quasigeostrophic model. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 3176–3207.
Pauley, P. M., and P. J. Smith, 1988: Direct and indirect effects of latent heat release on a synoptic-scale wave system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1209–1235.
Petterssen, S., 1955: A general survey of factors influencing development at sea level. J. Meteor.,12, 36–42.
Rausch, R. L. M., and P. J. Smith, 1996: A diagnosis of a model-simulated explosively developing extratropical cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 875–904.
Reed, R. J., A. J. Simmons, M. D. Albright, and P. Unden, 1988: The role of latent heat release in explosive cyclogenesis: Three examples based on ECMWF operational forecasts. Wea. Forecasting,3, 217–229.
Roebber, P. J., 1989: The role of surface heat and moisture fluxes associated with large-scale ocean current meanders in maritime cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1676–1694.
Rolfson, D. M., and P. J. Smith, 1996: A composite diagnosis of synoptic-scale extratropical cyclone development over the United States. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 1084–1099.
Steenburgh, W. J., and J. R. Holton, 1993: On the interpretation of geopotential height tendency equations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 2642–2645.
Sutcliffe, R. C., 1939: Cyclonic and anticyclonic development. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,65, 518–524.
——, 1947: A contribution to the problem of development. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,73, 370–383.
Tracton, M. S., 1973: The role of cumulus convection in the development of extratropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,101, 573–592.
Uccellini, L. W., 1990: Processes contributing to the rapid development of extratropical cyclones. Extratropical Cyclones: The Erik Palmén Memorial Volume, G. W. Newton and E. O. Holopainen, Eds., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81–105.
Zwack, P., and B. Okossi, 1986: A new method for solving the quasigeostrophic omega equation by incorporating surface pressure tendency data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 655–666.
Analytic functions simulating three horizontal heating distributions
Citation: Monthly Weather Review 128, 10; 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3692:TIOTHD>2.0.CO;2
Laplacians (multiplied by
Citation: Monthly Weather Review 128, 10; 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3692:TIOTHD>2.0.CO;2