This work was completed as part of the first author’s Master’s thesis at the University of Wisconsin—Madison, supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant ATM-0121186. Both authors wish to thank Linda Keller, Amanda Adams, and Drs. Jonathan Martin, John Young, Tomislava Vukićević, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. The authors also acknowledge many helpful conversations with Dr. Ronald Errico at early stages of this work.
Beare, R. J., , A. J. Thorpe, , and A. A. White, 2003: The predictability of extratropical cyclones: Nonlinear sensitivity to localized potential-vorticity perturbations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129 , 219–237.
Buizza, R., , J. Tribbia, , F. Molteni, , and T. Palmer, 1993: Computation of optimal unstable structures for a numerical weather prediction model. Tellus, 45A , 388–407.
Errico, R., , K. D. Raeder, , and L. Fillion, 2003: Examination of the sensitivity of forecast precipitation rates to possible perturbations of initial conditions. Tellus, 55A , 88–105.
Fehlmann, R., , and H. C. Davies, 1997: Misforecasts of synoptic systems: Diagnosis via PV retrodiction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 2247–2264.
Hall, M. C. G., 1986: Application of adjoint sensitivity theory to an atmospheric general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 43 , 2644–2651.
Hall, M. C. G., , and D. G. Cacuci, 1983: Physical interpretation of the adjoint functions for sensitivity analysis of atmospheric models. J. Atmos. Sci., 40 , 2537–2546.
Hall, M. C. G., , D. G. Cacuci, , and M. E. Schlesinger, 1982: Sensitivity analysis of a radiative convective model by the adjoint method. J. Atmos. Sci., 39 , 2038–2050.
Hello, G., , F. Lalaurette, , and J-N. Thepaut, 2000: Combined use of sensitivity information and observations to improve meteorological forecasts: A feasibility study applied to the ‘Christmas storm’ case. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 621–647.
Langland, R. H., , and R. M. Errico, 1996: Comments on “Use of an adjoint model for finding triggers of Alpine lee cyclogenesis.”. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124 , 757–760.
Langland, R. H., , R. L. Elsberry, , and R. M. Errico, 1995: Evaluation of physical processes in an idealized extratropical cyclone using adjoint sensitivity. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121 , 1349–1386.
Langland, R. H., , R. M. Shapiro, , and R. Gelaro, 2002: Initial condition sensitivity and error growth in forecasts of the 25 January 2000 east coast snowstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 957–974.
Lewis, J. M., , K. D. Raeder, , and R. M. Errico, 2001: Vapor flux associated with return flow over the Gulf of Mexico: A sensitivity study using adjoint modeling. Tellus, 53A , 74–93.
McTaggart-Cowan, R., , J. R. Gyakum, , and M. K. Yau, 2004: The impact of tropical remnants on extratropical cyclogenesis: Case study of Hurricanes Danielle and Earl (1998). Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 1933–1951.
Rabier, F., , P. Courtier, , and O. Talagrand, 1992: An application of adjoint models to sensitivity analysis. Beitr. Phys. Atmos., 65 , 177–192.
Rabier, F., , E. Klinker, , P. Courtier, , and A. Hollingsworth, 1996: Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122 , 121–150.
Talagrand, O., , and P. Courtier, 1987: Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation. Part 1: Theory. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 113 , 1311–1328.
Vukićević, T., , and K. Raeder, 1995: Use of and adjoint model for finding triggers for Alpine lee cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123 , 800–816.
Zhang, F., , C. Snyder, , and R. Rotunno, 2002: Mesoscale predictability of the “surprise” snowstorm of 24–25 January 2000. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 1617–1632.
Zou, X., , F. Vandenberghe, , M. Pondeca, , and Y-H. Kuo, 1997: Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-435+STR, 110 pp. [Available from NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.].
Zou, X., , K. Sriskandarajah, , W. Yu, , and S-Q. Zhang, 2001: Eliminating finite-amplitude non-physical oscillations in the time evolution of adjoint model solutions introduced by the leapfrog time-integration scheme. Tellus, 53A , 578–584.