We are grateful to Dudley Chelton for numerous helpful and stimulating discussions during the course of this research. We thank Mike McPhaden, Billy Kessler, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank Michael Schlax for helpful critical comments on an early version of the manuscript. We also benefitted from discussions with Carl Wunsch, Jay McCreary, Ken Brink, Breck Owens, Alexey Kaplan, Deepak Cherian, and Jake Gebbie. We thank the TAO Project Office of NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory for providing the dynamic height and wind data, and we thank the TAO Project and TRITON Project for their sustained efforts to collect the data. This research was funded by NASA Grant NNX10AO93G and is a contribution of the Ocean Vector Winds Science Team.
Antonov, J. I., R. A. Locarnini, T. P. Boyer, A. V. Mishonov, and H. E. Garcia, 2006: Salinity. Vol. 2, World Ocean Atlas 2005, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 61, 182 pp.
Aster, R. C., B. Borchers, and C. Thurber, 2005: Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 90, Elsevier, 296 pp.
Bendat, J. S., and A. G. Piersol, 2000: Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. 3rd ed. Wiley-Interscience, 594 pp.
Busalacchi, A., M. McPhaden, and J. Picaut, 1994: Variability in equatorial pacific sea surface topography during the verification phase of the TOPEX/POSEIDON mission. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 24 725–24 738.
Chelton, D. B., R. A. DeSzoeke, M. G. Schlax, K. El Naggar, and N. Siwertz, 1998: Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 433–460.
Chelton, D. B., M. G. Schlax, J. M. Lyman, and G. C. Johnson, 2003: Equatorially trapped Rossby waves in the presence of a meridionally sheared baroclinic flow in the Pacific Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr., 56, 323–380.
Chiswell, S. M., and R. Lukas, 1989: Rossby–gravity waves in the central equatorial Pacific Ocean during the NORPAX Hawaii-to-Tahiti Shuttle Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 2091–2098.
Chiswell, S. M., D. R. Watts, and M. Wimbush, 1987: Inverted echo sounder observations of variability in the eastern equatorial Pacific during the 1982-1983 El Niño. Deep-Sea Res., 34, 313–327.
Draper, N. R., and H. Smith, 1998: Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. Wiley-Interscience, 816 pp.
Durland, T. S., and J. T. Farrar, 2012: The wavenumber–frequency content of resonantly excited equatorial waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 42, 1834–1858.
Durland, T. S., R. M. Samelson, D. B. Chelton, and R. A. de Soeke, 2011: Modification of long equatorial Rossby wave phase speeds by zonal currents. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 41, 1077–1101.
Eriksen, C. C., 1980: Evidence for a continuous spectrum of equatorial waves in the Indian Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 85 (C6), 3285–3303.
Eriksen, C. C., 1982: Equatorial wave vertical modes observed in a western Pacific island array. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 12, 1206–1227.
Fairall, C., E. Bradley, J. Hare, A. Grachev, and J. Edson, 2003: Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes: Updates and verification for the COARE algorithm. J. Climate, 16, 571–591.
Farrar, J. T., 2008: Observations of the dispersion characteristics and meridional sea level structure of equatorial waves in the Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 1669–1689.
Farrar, J. T., 2011: Barotropic Rossby waves radiating from tropical instability waves in the Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 41, 1160–1181.
Garzoli, S., and E. J. Katz, 1981: Observations of inertia-gravity waves in the Atlantic from inverted echo sounders during FGGE. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11, 1463–1473.
Gilbert, S. A., and G. T. Mitchum, 2001: Equatorial inertia–gravity waves observed in TOPEX/Poseidon sea surface heights. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2465–2468.
Large, W. G., and S. Pond, 1981: Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11, 324–336.
Locarnini, R. A., A. V. Mishonov, J. I. Antonov, T. P. Boyer, and H. E. Garcia, 2006: Temperature. Vol. 1, World Ocean Atlas 2005, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 61, 182 pp.
Luther, D. S., 1980: Observations of long period waves in the tropical ocean and atmosphere. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 210 pp.
McPhaden, M., 1990: Comment on “Rossby–gravity waves in the central equatorial Pacific during the NORPAX Hawaii-to-Tahiti Shuttle Experiment” by S.M. Chiswell and R. Lukas. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 805–806.
McPhaden, M. J., and R. A. Knox, 1979: Equatorial Kelvin and inertio-gravity waves in a zonal shear flow. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 9, 263–277.
McPhaden, M. J., and Coauthors, 1998: Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere (TOGA) observing system: A decade of progress. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14 169–14 240.
Moore, D. W., and S. G. H. Philander, 1977: Modelling the tropical ocean circulation. The Sea, E. D. Goldberg. Ed., Marine Modeling, Vol. 6, Wiley-Interscience, 319–361.
Ripa, P., and S. P. Hayes, 1981: Evidence for equatorial trapped waves at the Galápagos Islands. J. Geophys. Res., 86, 6509–6516.
Scargle, J. D., 1982: Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys. J., 263, 835–853.
Shinoda, T., 2010: Observed disperion relation of Yanai waves and 17-day tropical instability waves in the Pacific Ocean. SOLA, 6, 17–20.
Tsai, P., J. O’Brien, and M. Luther, 1992: The 26-day oscillation observed in the satellite sea surface temperature measurements in the equatorial western Indian Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 9605–9618.
Weisberg, R. H., and S. P. Hayes, 1995: Upper ocean variability on the equator in the Pacific at 170°W. J. Geophys. Res., 100 (C10), 20 485–20 498.
Weisberg, R. H., A. Horigan, and C. Colin, 1979: Equatorially trapped Rossby–gravity waves in the Gulf of Guinea. J. Mar. Res., 37, 67–87.
Wheeler, M., and G. N. Kiladis, 1999: Convectively coupled equatorial waves: Analysis of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber–frequency domain. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 374–399.
Wunsch, C., 1996: The Ocean Circulation Inverse Problem. Cambridge University Press, 458 pp.
Wunsch, C., and A. Gill, 1976: Observations of equatorially trapped waves in Pacific sea level variations. Deep-Sea Res., 23, 371–390.
Yanai, M., and M. Murakami, 1970: Spectrum analysis of symmetric and antisymmetric equatorial waves. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 48, 331–346.
Zangvil, A., and M. Yanai, 1980: Upper tropospheric waves in the tropics. Part I: Dynamical analysis in the wavenumber–frequency domain. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 283–298.
These waves are “unit amplitude” in the sense each mode is normalized so that
As the zonal wavenumber goes to infinity, the inertia–gravity wave modes increasingly resemble pure, zonally propagating gravity waves, and the amplitude of V(m) becomes small compared to that of U(m). In this limit, the ratios
These conditions are that the measurement noise be white and the best-guess a priori estimate of the Fourier coefficients be one that assigns them all equal value, with a sum of squares equal to the expected dynamic height variance. The latter would correspond to a white a priori spectrum, but with a very particular phase arrangement. The dynamic height spectrum is not expected to be white, so our estimate is not optimal, but we have chosen the tapered least squares approach in part out of a spirit of agnosticism, to avoid giving the impression that our expectations have influenced the result.
Parseval’s theorem states that, for uniformly spaced samples, the integrated spectral power equals the variance of the data. This result relies on the orthogonality of sinusoids with the usual Fourier frequencies on a uniform sampling grid, but sinusoids on an irregular grid are not in general orthogonal, so Parseval’s theorem does not generally hold for a spectrum estimated from gappy data. In addition, a key premise of the tapered least squares method is that there is noise in the data and that a solution that represents all of the variance in the data is thus undesirable. Nonetheless, given our reasonably good SNR, we view an acceptable solution as one that has about the same amount of variance in the spectrum as in the raw data.
The confidence interval displayed in Fig. 7 is for judging whether there is a statistically significant difference in symmetric power and antisymmetric power at a particular wavenumber and frequency, which is done by using the confidence interval to determine whether the value plotted is bounded away from zero (i.e., whether the ratio of the symmetric spectrum to the antisymmetric spectrum is significantly different from 100 = 1). The upper and lower confidence intervals are each about 2.5 contour intervals, so any values in the figure that are three contour intervals away from zero represent a statistically significant symmetry preference.