## 1. Introduction

In coastal and estuarine systems, turbulent stress gradients are leading order in momentum budgets (Geyer et al. 2000; Lentz et al. 1999). In these systems, wave orbital motion and turbulent bottom and surface boundary layers can extend over most, or all, of the water column (e.g., Feddersen et al. 2007; Jones and Monismith 2008). To quantify turbulence properties and develop and test models for mixing in these systems, it is therefore important to understand the interactions that occur between turbulence and surface waves.

Surface waves affect turbulence in a kinematical sense as well as a dynamical sense. Turbulent eddies are advected in an unsteady way by wave orbital motion; therefore, assigning a physical interpretation to velocity and scalar fluctuation at a fixed location is complex (Lumley and Terray 1983). Additionally, a conceptual problem arises when an Eulerian framework (fixed reference frame) is used for analyzing turbulence in the presence of waves. It is therefore essential that the effects of the purely kinematic process of advection by wave orbital motion are understood and differentiated from dynamical interactions between waves and turbulence.

Advection of turbulence by wave orbital motion is particularly problematic when interpreting shallow-water turbulence measurements. In shallow water, sensors are typically mounted on moorings at fixed locations. Turbulent eddies are advected past the sensors by the background flow and turbulence properties are inferred from the resulting time series. Because time scales for advection of turbulence past a point are short compared with time scales over which turbulence evolves, the spatial structure of turbulence is inferred from time series using a frozen turbulence approximation (Taylor 1938). Thus, the spatial structure of turbulence is not observed directly but rather the distribution of energy among turbulence length scales is inferred from spectra in frequency space (*ω* spectra). Dissipation rates are typically estimated from −5/3 fits to the high-frequency (inertial subrange) portion of *ω* spectra. Reynolds stresses can be estimated by integrating *u*′–*w*′ cospectra.

Waves introduce two distinct problems when estimating turbulence statistics from this kind of data. First, when turbulent eddies are advected past sensors by wave orbital motion, the turbulence *ω* spectrum is difficult to interpret as it can be quite different from the corresponding spatial spectrum (*κ* spectrum). As a result, estimates of turbulence properties such as dissipation rate from the *ω* spectrum are affected dramatically by wave advection (Lumley and Terray 1983; Trowbridge and Elgar 2001; Feddersen et al. 2007). Second, the majority of the turbulence covariance is associated with energy-containing eddies and often overlaps in frequency space with the wave peak. Because wave orbital velocities can be two orders of magnitude larger than turbulent velocity fluctuations, correlations between horizontal and vertical wave orbital velocity components (wave biases) often dominate stress estimates (Shaw and Trowbridge 2001; Rosman et al. 2008). There has been considerable work on developing methods to isolate the turbulence spectrum by removing parts of the velocity signal that are correlated with surface elevation, pressure, or between velocities at different locations (Benilov and Filyushkin 1970; Shaw and Trowbridge 2001; Feddersen and Williams 2007). While these methods can remove or reduce the wave peak and often enable reasonable Reynolds stress estimates, the effects of waves can never be removed from a turbulence *ω* spectrum because turbulent energy is rearranged in frequency space when eddies are advected by wave orbital motion. To interpret observed *ω* spectra and evaluate estimates of turbulence properties, it is therefore important to understand how advection of turbulence by wave orbital motion affects turbulence *ω* spectra.

In this paper, we do not consider the problem of biases in estimates of integral quantities (e.g., Reynolds stress) caused by wave orbital velocities themselves. Rather, our goal is to elucidate the kinematic effects of wave advection on turbulence *ω* spectra. In steady currents *u*_{c}, the frequency *ω* of turbulent fluctuations observed at a fixed location can be converted to the effective wavenumber *κ* sampled using a simple form of Taylor’s frozen turbulence approximation: *κ* = *ω*/*u*_{c}. When eddies are advected by wave orbital motion, the situation is more complex as the energy corresponding to a single-turbulence wavenumber is distributed over a range of frequencies. The effect of unsteady wave advection on the turbulence *ω* spectra can be investigated using a more general form of the frozen turbulence approximation. If turbulence with a known *κ* spectrum is advected past a fixed location by known wave and current velocities, the *ω* spectrum that would be observed can be calculated using a transformation between the measurement time and the effective position in the “frozen” turbulence field sampled. Using this approach, Lumley and Terray (1983) solved for the *ω* spectrum that would be observed if inertial subrange isotropic turbulence (Kolmogorov −5/3 law) was advected past a point by waves propagating parallel to a uniform current.

Lumley and Terray’s (1983) results illustrate that in the presence of waves more of the turbulent energy appears at frequencies higher than the wave frequency than if the same turbulence is advected by a current alone. Therefore, dissipation rate estimates from −5/3 fits to the inertial subrange of *ω* spectra are biased (overestimated) if waves are not taken into account in the analysis. The method introduced by Lumley and Terray (1983) is commonly used to estimate dissipation rates from measured *ω*-spectra-containing waves and has been extended to cases in which waves propagate at an angle to the current (Trowbridge and Elgar 2001), elliptical wave orbital motion (Feddersen et al. 2007), and directionally spread waves (Gerbi et al. 2009). These methods appear to provide robust dissipation rate estimates even when wave advection is very large, as in the surfzone (Feddersen 2010, 2012).

The transformation from space (*x*, *κ*) to time (*t*, *ω*) introduced by Lumley and Terray (1983) is general and can be used to convert any spectral shape from wavenumber to frequency space using known wave and current velocities. Gerbi et al. (2008) applied this transformation to turbulence *u*′–*w*′ cospectra and illustrated that the distribution of turbulence covariance (Reynolds stress) in frequency space is relatively unaffected by waves if rms wave orbital velocities are less than twice the current (*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} < 2), but the rearrangement of turbulence covariance in frequency space is significant for *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} > 2. In that work, semitheoretical curves representing the *κ*-spectrum shape were fit to the low-frequency portion of turbulence cospectra, below the wave peak. These fits were extrapolated across the wave peak and higher frequencies and integrated to estimate Reynolds stresses. However, the method was limited to cases where *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} < 2, for which the distribution of covariance in frequency space is not significantly affected by wave orbital motion.

Here, we extend previous work that investigated the effects of wave advection on the inertial subrange part of turbulence spectra (Lumley and Terray 1983; Trowbridge and Elgar 2001; Feddersen et al. 2007) by considering a more realistic turbulence spectrum that includes a rolloff at energy-containing scales. The general frozen turbulence approach is used to transform model turbulence *κ* spectra to *ω* spectra observed at a point when the turbulence is advected by waves and current. We systematically vary the current, wave properties, and turbulence properties across a wide parameter space that spans conditions in the coastal ocean, extending the work of Gerbi et al. (2008) to cases for which wave orbital motion is large compared with the current. We then investigate how key properties of *ω* spectra vary across this parameter space. The results of our analyses inform the interpretation of turbulence *ω* spectra from a fixed location and can be used to guide the estimation of turbulence properties from those spectra.

## 2. Analysis framework

### a. Transformation of spectra from wavenumber space to frequency space

**u′**(

**r**) is advected past a sensor at position

**r**

_{0}by the current

**u**

_{c}and wave orbital velocities

**u**

_{w}. The turbulent velocity fluctuation measured by the sensor at each time

*t*is the turbulent velocity fluctuation at position

**r**(

*t*) +

**r**

_{0}in the spatial turbulence field, whereConceptually, this relationship can be used to convert the three-dimensional spatial field of turbulent velocity fluctuations to the time series of velocity fluctuations observed by a sensor at a point. Because turbulence is a stochastic process, the spatial field of turbulent velocity fluctuations is not known. However, semitheoretical models exist for turbulence spatial spectra that describe the distribution of the energy and covariance among turbulent length scales.

_{ij}(

**), quantifies the covariance between velocity components in directions**

*κ**i*and

*j*per unit volume in wavenumber space

*d*

**= (**

*κ**dκ*

_{1},

*dκ*

_{2},

*dκ*

_{3}) at a given wavenumber

**= (**

*κ**κ*

_{1},

*κ*

_{2},

*κ*

_{3}). The correlation function

*R*

_{ij}(

**r**), representing the correlation between velocity components

*i*and

*j*at points in space separated by position vector

**r**, is by definition the inverse Fourier transform of the spectral tensor function, that is,where the integrations are from −∞ to to ∞. If turbulence with spatial representation given by Eq. (2) is advected past a sensor by a steady current

**u**

_{c}and wave orbital velocity

**u**

_{w}, then the effective spatial position in the turbulence field that is sampled by the sensor at time

*t*is given by Eq. (1). Therefore, the correlation function of the measured velocity time series can be written aswhere

*x*

_{1}has been defined as the direction of the current, and

**r**

_{w}(

*t*) is the wave orbital excursion at time

*t*. In the last step, the negative sign in the first exponent can be omitted because of symmetry.

_{ij}(

**) is a function of the turbulence only, and**

*κ***r**

_{w}(

*t*) is a function of the waves only. If it is assumed that the waves and turbulence are independent random processes, then Eq. (3) can be written asThe angle brackets are the expected value of the function inside the brackets at a given time

*t*over many realizations. This term incorporates the statistical distribution of

**r**

_{w}at a particular time

*t*. Note that

**r**

_{w}(

*t*). It is therefore the inverse Fourier transform of its probability density function

*p*(

**r**

_{w}). If it is assumed that wave orbital excursions have a Gaussian distribution, that is,

*p*(

**r**

_{w}) is Gaussian (e.g., Wyngaard and Clifford 1977; Lumley and Terray 1983), which is true for random waves, then the characteristic function can be expressed aswhere

*x*

_{l}and

*x*

_{m}, and the angle brackets represent the expected value over all times

*τ*. The quantity

*c*

_{lm}(0) is therefore the covariance of the orbital excursion components

*r*

_{l}and

*r*

_{m}. Although the assumption that wave orbital excursions have a Gaussian distribution breaks down in very shallow water, it is a reasonable approximation offshore of the surfzone. The assumption that fluctuations due to waves and turbulence are uncorrelated may also be poor under breaking waves. Therefore, the results should be used with caution for analysis of turbulence associated with wave breaking.

*c*

_{lm}(

*t*) is the inverse Fourier transform of the spectrum of wave orbital excursions

*P*

_{ij}(

*ω*) can then be calculated as the Fourier transform of the turbulence correlation function

*R*

_{ij}(

*t*):For any given turbulence wavenumber spectrum Φ

_{ij}(

**) and any known current**

*κ**u*

_{c}and wave orbital velocity spectrum

*P*

_{ij}(

*ω*) can be computed from Eqs. (6) to (8).

*x*

_{1}direction controls the temporal fluctuations observed by the sensor. Therefore, Eq. (7) can be written in terms of one-dimensional spectrum

*E*

_{ij}(

*κ*

_{1}), defined as the contribution to the covariance of

*u*

_{i}and

*u*

_{j}from all wavenumbers with a

*κ*

_{1}component between

*κ*

_{1}and

*κ*

_{1}+

*dκ*

_{1}(see Pope 2000). The term

*E*

_{ij}is related to the spectral tensor Φ

_{ij}byFor the 1D case, using Eq. (9), Eq. (7) reduces toIn this study, Eqs. (6), (8), and (10) were used to transform model turbulence wavenumber spectra to frequency spectra that would be observed by a fixed sensor when the turbulence was advected by currents and wave orbital velocities with a range of peak periods and amplitudes.

### b. Representation of turbulence

The transformations above were applied to semitheoretical wavenumber spectra for both isotropic and anisotropic turbulence.

#### 1) Isotropic turbulence

_{ij}(

**) is completely determined by the energy spectrum because the turbulence properties are independent of direction (Pope 2000). The energy spectrum**

*κ**E*(

*κ*) represents the total turbulent kinetic energy contained in wavenumbers with magnitude between

*κ*and

*κ*+

*dκ*and can also be thought of as Φ

_{ij}(

**) stripped of all directional information, that is,Note that the scalar energy spectrum**

*κ**E*(

*κ*), which describes the turbulent kinetic energy as a function of wavenumber magnitude, is different from the one-dimensional spectrum tensor

*E*

_{ij}(

*κ*

_{1}), which describes the covariance between two velocity components as a function of the wavenumber component in the

*x*

_{1}direction. Our notation follows that of Pope (2000).

*ε*and the energy-containing turbulence length scale

*L*(Pope 2000). The spectra follow the Kolmogorov −5/3 relationship in the inertial subrange, the low-wavenumber rolloff is controlled by

*L*, and the high-wavenumber rolloff is controlled by the Kolmogorov length scale

*η*= (

*ν*

^{3}/

*ε*)

^{1/4}, where

*ν*is kinematic viscosity:The function

*f*

_{L}determines the shape of the energy-containing range and tends to unity for large

*κ*/

*κ*

_{0}. Similarly,

*f*

_{η}describes the shape of the dissipation range and tends to unity for small

*κ*/

*κ*

_{η}. We use

*C*= 1.5,

*p*

_{0}= 2,

*c*

_{β}= 5.2, and

*c*

_{η}= 0.40 (Pope 2000). We have defined

*κ*

_{0}= 2

*π*/

*L*as the wavenumber corresponding to the peak in the variance-preserving form of the energy spectrum, which differs from the definition of

*L*used by Pope (2000).

*E*(

*κ*) in Eq. (12) (Figs. 1a,b,d,e).

#### 2) Anisotropic turbulence

*E*

_{13}(

*κ*

_{1}), we used a spectrum shape proposed for the atmospheric boundary layer by Kaimal et al. (1972) and later applied to the coastal ocean bottom and surface boundary layers by Trowbridge and Elgar (2003), Feddersen and Williams (2007), and Gerbi et al. (2008):The shape of this spectrum is controlled by two parameters, the spatial scale of the energy-containing turbulent eddies (2

*π*/

*κ*

_{0}), and the Reynolds stress

*κ*≫

*κ*

_{0}, the spectrum goes like

*κ*

_{1}

^{−7/3}.

### c. Representations of waves

*ω*

_{w}is the peak wave frequency, and Δ

*ω*

_{w}is the width of the wave peak (one standard deviation). Two different spectral peak widths were used in the analyses: Δ

*ω*

_{w}/

*ω*

_{w}= 0.025 (narrowband) and Δ

*ω*

_{w}/

*ω*

_{w}= 0.2 (broadband).

*α*controls the spectrum amplitude,

*g*= 9.8 m s

^{−2}is acceleration due to gravity,

*β*= 1.25 is a constant, and

*γ*= 3.3 controls the enhancement of the wave peak relative to background. The exponent

*r*is given bywhere

*ζ*= 0.07 for

*ω*<

*ω*

_{w}and 0.09 for

*ω*>

*ω*

_{w}.

*ω*

^{2}=

*gκ*tanh

*κh*, where here

*κ*is the wavenumber of the wave and

*h*is the water depth. The coefficient

*α*was set such that Eqs. (15) and (16) were satisfied. Although not appropriate close to the surfzone, linear wave theory has been shown to work well across the majority of the continental shelf.

The correlation function of wave orbital excursions was then computed from the wave orbital excursion spectrum using Eq. (6). The peak wave frequency *ω*_{w} as well as the magnitude of the wave spectrum *σ*_{w} was varied to investigate how wave properties affect observed turbulence frequency spectra.

### d. Cases

One-dimensional spectra [*E*_{11}(*κ*_{1}), *E*_{33}(*κ*_{1}), *E*_{13}(*κ*_{1})] for isotropic and anisotropic turbulence described in section 2b were transformed to corresponding *ω* spectra that would be observed at a fixed location for four different peak wave frequencies, four energy-containing turbulence length scales, and four currents (64 combinations total; Table 1). For each combination of these parameters, rms wave orbital velocities were varied from 0 up to 7 times the current (*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} = 0–7). The parameter space included peak wave frequencies *ω*_{w} ranging from 1/8 to 8 times the frequency corresponding to advection of large turbulent eddies by the current *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}. These analyses were repeated for narrowband and broadband Gaussian wave spectra and JONSWAP wave spectra.

Parameters used to generate frequency spectra observed when isotropic and anisotropic turbulence is advected past a point by parallel waves and current.

## 3. Results

### a. Effects of wave advection on observed turbulence ω spectra

The integrals of turbulence autospectra and cospectra, which represent the total velocity component variances and covariances (Reynolds stresses), respectively, are not altered by wave orbital motion. However, as unsteady wave orbital velocities increase relative to the steady current, the shapes of observed spectra change (Figs. 3, 4). In our analyses, when rms wave orbital velocities were smaller than the current speed (*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} < 1), *ω* spectra were affected little by wave orbital motion and were similar to when turbulence was advected by just a current. When rms wave orbital velocities exceeded the current speed (*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} > 1), less variance appeared to the left of the wave frequency (*ω* < *ω*_{w}) and more appeared to the right of the wave frequency (*ω* > *ω*_{w}) than when turbulence was advected by the current alone (Figs. 3, 4). This is most easily seen in the variance-preserving spectra. When plotted on a logarithmic frequency scale, the area under these curves is proportional to each frequency band’s contribution to the total variance.

The turbulence *ω* spectra can be divided into 1) a low-frequency part (*ω* ≪ *ω*_{w}, *ω* < *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}) in which spectral density is constant and there is an apparent rolloff that resembles the rolloff in the wavenumber spectrum at energy-containing scales, 2) an intermediate frequency part near the wave band in which spectral density oscillates with frequency, and 3) a high-frequency part (*ω* ≫ *ω*_{w}, *ω* ≫ *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}) in which spectral density is increased by waves. At frequencies well above *ω*_{w} and *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}, wave advection causes a positive offset in the −5/3 part of the spectrum, as first described by Lumley and Terray (1983). Both the apparent rolloff frequency and the high-frequency extent of the intermediate range vary with properties of the wave and turbulence spectra. The part of the spectrum that is altered by wave advection extends to lower frequencies for lower-frequency waves. The intermediate frequency range extends to higher frequencies as the wave frequency increases and as the wave orbital velocity increases. The same general patterns are true for both isotropic turbulence autospectra and anisotropic turbulence cospectra (Figs. 3, 4).

The shape of the wave spectrum does not significantly affect the low- or high-frequency behavior of the observed turbulence spectrum; however, it strongly affects the spectrum shape close to the wave peak, in the intermediate frequency range (Fig. 5). The narrower the wave peak, the larger the magnitude of oscillations in the turbulence *ω* spectrum near the wave peak. Although these oscillations have a large effect on the value of the spectrum at a given frequency near the wave band, their effect on the integral of the spectrum is minimal; therefore, the shape of integrated turbulence spectrum is almost independent of the shape of the wave spectrum.

### b. Dimensionless parameters controlling the shapes of observed spectra

Expressions for the shapes of observed *ω* spectra can be derived by substituting the expressions for model *κ* spectra [Eqs. (12)–(14)] into the equations used to transform spectra from wavenumber to frequency space [Eqs. (6), (8), (10)]. Variables in the equations (*κ*_{1}, *t*, *ω*) are then arranged into dimensionless variables [*ω*/(*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}), *s* = *κ*_{1}/*κ*_{0}, and *y* = *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}*t*], where *ω*/(*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}) is dimensionless frequency, and *s* and *y* are integration variables, resulting in expressions for *ω* spectra in terms of dimensionless parameter groups. The shape of the dissipation range has negligible effect on the *ω* spectrum, except for very large values of *ω*/(*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}), corresponding to very small, high-frequency fluctuations that are typically not resolved in field measurements. Over the frequency range relevant to field measurements, *f*_{η} = 1, and the shape of the *ω* spectrum is independent of *κ*_{0}*η*. We therefore take *f*_{η} = 1 in our theoretical analyses. Derivations are provided in the appendix.

*u*

_{1}autospectrum for isotropic turbulence iswhereFor the

*u*

_{3}autospectrum

*P*

_{33}, the same equations apply except that

*F*

_{1}is replaced by

*G*

_{1}:

The magnitude of the spectrum is proportional to (*ε*/*κ*_{0})^{2/3}/(*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}), while the spectrum shape is described by the function *F*_{3}. The *ω*-spectrum shape therefore depends primarily on the two parameters *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} and *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}. Near the peak wave frequency, the *ω* spectrum is also affected by *ω*/(*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}) and normalized such that

*F*

_{2}and

*μ*are defined in Eq. (21).

The shapes of both turbulence autospectra and cospectra in frequency space are controlled primarily by the same two parameters: *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} and *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}. The first parameter *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} represents the ratio of the frequency corresponding to the low-wavenumber rolloff in the turbulence spectrum in the absence of waves *u*_{c}*κ*_{0} to the peak wave frequency *ω*_{w}. The second parameter *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} is the ratio of the rms advection speed by waves to the advection speed by current. A third parameter *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}, representing the ratio of the rms wave orbital excursion to the spatial scale of energy-containing eddies, can be formed from the product of *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} and *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}. Equations (21)–(23) can be rewritten in terms of any two of these three dimensionless parameters.

When the fraction of the variance and covariance appearing in the spectrum at frequencies less than the frequency corresponding to advection of energy-containing turbulence by the current *u*_{c}*κ*_{0} is plotted against *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}, the results collapse according to *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} (Figs. 6a,c). However, the results become independent of *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} for *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} > 1, which corresponds to wave frequencies in the flat part of the turbulence spectrum, below the turbulence rolloff frequency. That is, for *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} > 1, the fraction of the turbulent energy below *ω = u*_{c}*κ*_{0} is independent of the wave frequency and is a function only of *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}.

When instead the fraction of the total variance and covariance appearing in the spectrum at frequencies less than the peak wave frequency is plotted against *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}, the results collapse again according to the value of *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} (Figs. 7a,c). When the variance and covariance fraction below the wave frequency are plotted against *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}, results for all 64 parameter combinations collapse onto a single curve for high values of *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} (Figs. 7b,d). Curves for different *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} values collapse onto this curve when *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} > 2*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}, corresponding to *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} > 2, that is, when the average speed at which turbulence is advected past a point is dominated by wave orbital motion rather than current. This means that the fraction of the variance or covariance below the peak wave frequency depends only on wave properties and is independent of the current if *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} > 2.

### c. Properties of ω spectra and dependence on dimensionless parameters

We now consider how turbulence *ω*-spectrum shapes vary with the above dimensionless parameters, focusing on properties that are relevant to interpreting observations and estimating turbulence parameters. The dependences of spectrum properties on dimensionless parameters are summarized in Table 2.

Summary of dependence of spectrum properties on dimensionless parameters.

#### 1) Inertial subrange (*ω* > 10*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}, *ω* > 10*ω*_{w})

For frequencies much higher than both the wave frequency and the frequency corresponding to advection of energy contain eddies by the current, the spectral energy is increased by wave advection, and there is a positive offset in the spectrum (e.g., Fig. 4), as first described by Lumley and Terray (1983). Eddies that appear in the spectrum at these frequencies have length scales much smaller than the wave orbital excursion (*κ* ≫ *ω*_{w}/*σ*_{w}). Wave orbital motion together with the current determines the speed at which they are advected past a sensor. The advection speed varies over a wave cycle; therefore, energy corresponding to a single-turbulence wavenumber *κ* is spread across a range of frequencies. For *κ* > *κ*_{0}, there is a rapid decrease in the turbulent energy with increasing *κ*. Additionally, for *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} > 1, waves increase the time-averaged advection speed. The net result is that turbulent energy is observed at higher frequencies in the presence of waves than when the turbulence is advected by just a current. For this reason, there is a positive offset in the inertial subrange part of the spectrum relative to when there are no waves.

*I*that multiplies the expression for the −5/3 region in the absence of waves (Trowbridge and Elgar 2001):If a

*κ*

^{−5/3}spectral shape is assumed for all wavenumbers, then an expression for

*I*can be derived by taking the high-frequency limit of Eq. (21) (see the appendix). For parallel waves and current, the expression is (see also Trowbridge and Elgar 2001)The offset in the −5/3 part of the spectrum affects the estimation of dissipation rates from fits to the high-frequency portion of autospectra; correction of dissipation estimates is relatively straightforward.

*κ*

^{−7/3}shape; therefore, cospectra, when plotted on log scales, have −7/3 slopes for high frequencies. Wave advection causes an offset in the −7/3 part of the

*ω*spectrum that is analogous to the offset in the −5/3 region in autospectra. The offset is also a function of one parameter

*σ*

_{w}/

*u*

_{c}. It can be shown (see the appendix) that, for

*ω*≫

*ω*

_{w}and

*ω*≫

*u*

_{c}

*κ*

_{0}, Eq. (23) reduces towhereThe functional forms of

*I*and

*J*differ due to the different exponent of

*κ*in the

*κ*spectrum.

We evaluated the accuracy of these relationships for spectra that include a low-frequency rolloff (Fig. 1) by fitting lines with −5/3 and −7/3 slopes to the inertial subranges of computed autospectra and cospectra on logarithmic axes. For the autospectra, we present results only for vertical velocities. Similar results were obtained in our analyses of horizontal velocities. In each case, the start and end points for the fit were determined from the start and end points of the inertial subrange of the corresponding *κ* spectrum. The low-frequency end point was chosen to be the larger of *κ*_{lf}(*u*_{c} + *σ*_{w}), where *κ*_{lf} was the start of the −5/3 (or −7/3) region in the *κ* spectrum and 10*ω*_{w}. The term *κ*_{lf}(*u*_{c} + *σ*_{w}) corresponds to advection of the largest eddies in the inertial subrange at the speed *u*_{c} + *σ*_{w}, which is only exceeded 15% of the time for random waves. The high-frequency end point was chosen to be *ω*_{hf} = *κ*_{hf}(*u*_{c} + *σ*_{w}), where *κ*_{hf} was the start of the dissipation range for autospectra and the Nyquist wavenumber for cospectra. End points *ω*_{lf} < 10*ω*_{w} and *ω*_{hf} > *ω*_{N}/8, where *ω*_{N} is the Nyquist frequency, were not allowed.

The factors *I* and *J* were computed from spectral fits for different current speeds, wave amplitudes, wave frequencies, and turbulence length scales (Fig. 8). Both *I* and *J* were a function of one variable *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} and were independent of wave frequency and turbulence length scale (Fig. 8), confirming that the low-wavenumber rolloff in the turbulence *κ* spectrum has negligible effect on the −5/3 (or −7/3) part of the *ω* spectrum for the range of conditions considered in this study. Results from the fits to autospectra agreed well with the analytical solution of Trowbridge and Elgar (2001), which was derived for a Kolmogorov −5/3 *κ* spectrum with no rolloff or dissipation range. Therefore, dissipation estimates from Eqs. (24) and (25) are expected to be robust and independent of details of the turbulence spectrum and wave spectrum as long as the inertial subrange spans a sufficient wavenumber range. Results from fits to cospectra also agreed well with the theoretical solution [Eq. (27)].

#### 2) Intermediate frequency range (0.5*ω*_{w} < *ω* < 10*ω*_{w})

In the intermediate-frequency range close to the wave peak, the shape of the turbulence *ω* spectrum is complex and depends on the shape of the wave spectrum. For narrowband waves, there are large distinct fluctuations in spectral density from 0.5*ω*_{w} to 10*ω*_{w}, with dips in spectral density at harmonics of the peak wave frequency (Figs. 3, 4). The amplitude of these fluctuations increases with increasing *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}. The fluctuations are smaller and less well-defined for broadband waves (Fig. 5).

As shown by Lumley and Terray (1983), the frequency spectrum resulting from advection of turbulence by monochromatic waves with no current is a line spectrum that can be represented as the sum of delta functions at harmonics of the wave frequency. For waves with finite spectral width, the turbulence frequency spectrum is a sequence of finite-width peaks, centered at harmonics of the peak wave frequency. The broader the wave spectrum, the broader are the peaks in the turbulence spectrum and the more overlap occurs between consecutive harmonics. When a current occurs with monochromatic waves, the line peaks at harmonics of the wave frequency are broadened, and there is a singularity at harmonics of the wave frequency (Lumley and Terray 1983). For waves with finite spectral width, these singularities become “dips” in the turbulence frequency spectrum. Therefore, the oscillations in the turbulence spectrum are larger for larger *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} and also larger and more well-defined for narrower wave spectra (smaller Δ*ω*_{w}/*ω*_{w}; Fig. 5).

#### 3) High-frequency peak in variance-preserving spectrum (2*u*_{c}*κ*_{0} < *ω* < 10*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}, *ω* > 2*ω*_{w})

Although there are large fluctuations in the turbulence *ω* spectrum at frequencies close to the wave peak (0.5*ω*_{w} < *ω* < 10*ω*_{w}; see previous section), there are some general trends in the underlying spectrum shape within this frequency range. For all cases where the wave orbital excursion is larger than the energy-containing turbulent eddies (*σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} > 2), wave advection results in a shift of the turbulence rolloff (or peak in variance-preserving spectrum) to higher frequencies (e.g., Figs. 3, 4, left column). This is because energy-containing length scales are smaller than the wave orbital excursion; therefore, wave orbital motion increases the speed at which eddies, from energy-containing scales through the inertial subrange, are advected past the sensor. The bulk of the turbulence spectrum, from the rolloff through the inertial subrange, is therefore shifted to higher frequencies. If *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} < 2, there is not a well-defined, high-frequency peak in the variance-preserving spectrum.

For each spectrum that satisfied the condition *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} > 2, the frequency of the peak in the variance-preserving spectrum *ω*_{peak} was estimated by smoothing the variance-preserving spectrum to remove oscillations and selecting the frequency that corresponded to the maximum in the smoothed spectrum. For *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} < 1, the frequency of the peak is unaffected by wave advection and *ω*_{peak} ~ 2*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}. For *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} > 1, *ω*_{peak}/*u*_{c}*κ*_{0} increases linearly with *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} (Fig. 9). This translates to an *ω*_{peak} proportional to *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}, corresponding to advection of energy-containing eddies at the rms wave orbital velocity. The dimensionless peak frequency *ω*_{peak}/*u*_{c}*κ*_{0} increases more slowly with *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} for cospectra than for autospectra due to the more rapid decline in spectral energy with increasing wavenumber in cospectra. These results suggest that if the wave orbital excursion is long compared with energy-containing length scales (*σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} > 2), energy-containing turbulence length scales (*L* = 2*π*/*κ*_{0}) can be estimated from the peak frequency in the variance-preserving turbulence *ω* spectrum *ω*_{peak} together with the ratio of the wave orbital velocity to current *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}.

#### 4) Low-frequency range (*ω* < 0.5*ω*_{w}, *ω* < *u*_{c}*κ*_{0})

The shapes of the low-frequency parts of both autospectra and cospectra resemble those in the absence of waves (Figs. 3, 4, 5). At very low frequencies, the spectrum is flat and spectral density does not vary with frequency (Figs. 3, 4, 5). We denote the spectral density in this frequency range as *P*_{33,lf}. The value of *P*_{33,lf} increases as *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} increases from 0 to 1 and then decays as *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} increases further (Fig. 10a). The offset in *P*_{33,lf} associated with waves is greatest for large *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} and reduces to zero for *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} < 1. The same pattern occurs for *P*_{13,lf}.

The rolloff in the spectrum appears to be shifted to lower frequencies as wave orbital velocities increase (Figs. 3, 4, 5). The frequency of this apparent rolloff was estimated as *ω*_{90}, the frequency above which the spectral density is less than 90% of its value in the very low frequency, flat part of the spectrum. The apparent rolloff frequency was determined empirically from computed spectra and is plotted versus parameters that control the spectral shape in Fig. 11. The apparent rolloff frequency decreases as *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c} increases (Figs. 11a,c). This effect is more extreme when *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} is larger, that is, when the wave frequency is lower relative to the frequency corresponding to advection of energy-containing eddies by the current. When *ω*_{90} is plotted against *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} the results collapse onto a single curve (Figs. 11b,d), illustrating that the low-frequency spectral shape, in dimensionless form, is determined primarily by the ratio of wave orbital excursion to energy-containing turbulence length scale. There are small deviations from this curve according to the value of *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}. The apparent rolloff frequency is constant and independent of *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} when *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w} *<* 1 (Figs. 11b,d), corresponding to cases where the wave orbital excursion is smaller than the size of energy-containing eddies, and therefore the frequency at which energy-containing eddies appear in the spectrum is not altered by wave advection.

*ω*≪

*ω*

_{w}), if

*σ*

_{w}

*κ*

_{0}/

*ω*

_{w}

*>*1, Eqs. (21) and (23) reduce to (see the appendix)where

*P*

_{33,lf}and

*P*

_{33,lf}are the spectral densities in the low-frequency flat parts of the autospectrum and cospectrum. Therefore, the low-frequency spectral shape in the presence of waves can be represented by the constant spectral density at very low frequencies multiplied by a factor that decays exponentially with increasing frequency. The decay scale for the spectrum in dimensionless form is set by

*σ*

_{w}

*κ*

_{0}/

*ω*

_{w}. This exponential decay factor causes the shift of the apparent rolloff to lower frequency.

*ω*→ 0 (e.g.,

*n*= 90% for

*ω*

_{90}). The values determined empirically from spectra agreed very well with Eq. (29) for

*σ*

_{w}

*κ*

_{0}/

*ω*

_{w}

*>*1 (Figs. 11b,d).

*σ*

_{w}/

*u*

_{c}. The apparent low-frequency rolloff is therefore independent of the true rolloff that occurs in the wavenumber spectrum at

*κ*~

*κ*

_{0}.

## 4. Summary and conclusions

We have extended previous work that investigated the kinematic effects of wave advection on fixed-location observations of inertial subrange turbulence (Lumley and Terray 1983) by considering the complete range of turbulence length scales, from energy-containing scales to dissipative scales. Using model turbulence *κ*-spectrum shapes together with a general form of the frozen turbulence approximation, we investigated the effects of wave orbital motion on turbulence *ω* spectra across a wide parameter space that includes conditions typical in the coastal ocean, extending previous work (Gerbi et al. 2008) to situations where wave orbital velocities exceed the current. While we found that the high-wavenumber dissipation range has negligible effect on turbulence *ω* spectra across frequencies typically of interest, interaction between wave advection and the rolloff at energy-containing scales significantly affects the shapes of turbulence *ω* spectra.

We showed that the shapes of *ω* spectra can be expressed as a function of two key dimensionless parameters: *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}, the ratio of mean advection speed by waves to the current, and *u*_{c}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}, the ratio of the time scale associated with waves to the time scale corresponding to advection of energy-containing turbulence by the current. The shape of the dimensionless spectrum at high frequencies is controlled primarily by the parameter *σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}, while the low-frequency spectral shape is controlled by *σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}.

Our analyses illustrated the dependences of characteristic features of *ω* spectra on these dimensionless parameters (Table 2):

- The offset due to waves of the −5/3 region of autospectra and the −7/3 region of cospectra is a function of
*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}only, illustrating that the rolloff and dissipation range have negligible effect on the inertial subrange in wave-affected*ω*spectra. Previously proposed methods for estimating dissipation rate (Trowbridge and Elgar 2001; Feddersen et al. 2007; Gerbi et al. 2009) are therefore expected to be robust across a wide range of conditions. - When
*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}< 1, the peak in the variance-preserving spectrum occurs at*ω*~*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}and is unaffected by wave advection. If*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}> 1 and*σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}> 2, the peak in the variance-preserving spectrum occurs at*ω*~*σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}, corresponding to advection of energy-containing eddies at the rms wave orbital velocity. In these parameter ranges, turbulence length scales can be estimated from the frequency of the peak in the variance-preserving turbulence spectrum if the wave peak can first be adequately removed. - When the wave orbital excursion is smaller than energy-containing eddies (
*σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}< 1), the low-frequency rolloff in autospectra and cospectra is unaffected by wave advection and occurs at*ω*~*u*_{c}*κ*_{0}. When*σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}> 1, there is an apparent rolloff at*ω*~ (*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c})^{−1}*ω*_{w}*.*Previously proposed methods for estimating Reynolds stresses and turbulence length scales by fitting to model spectrum shapes to the low-frequency portion of*ω*spectra (Gerbi et al. 2008; Kirincich et al. 2010) should therefore only be used when*σ*_{w}*κ*_{0}/*ω*_{w}< 1 and*σ*_{w}/*u*_{c}< 2. For larger values of these parameters, the changes in the spectrum shape due to the wave advection derived in this study must be taken into account.

Our model results have revealed the characteristics of turbulence *ω* spectra that can be attributed to the purely kinematic process of advection by wave orbital motion. Because spectrum shapes collapse according to key dimensionless parameters, these parameters can be used to diagnose when wave advection needs to be taken into account and its effects turbulence spectra. Although idealized, our model results provide insight into the interpretation fixed-location turbulence observations and a valuable point of comparison for the complex spectral shapes that are often computed from field measurements.

## Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation (1061108, 1435530). We are grateful to Falk Feddersen and an anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful comments that improved this manuscript.

## APPENDIX

### Expressions for the Shapes of Turbulence *ω* Spectra

#### a. Horizontal velocity autospectrum for isotropic turbulence

*u*

_{1}, along direction

*x*

_{1}, in wavenumber space isThe integration variable is

*s*′ =

*κ*/

*κ*

_{0}, and

*E*

_{11}is defined such that

*E*

_{11}and

*F*

_{1}are even functions, that is,

*s*=

*κ*

_{1}/

*κ*

_{0}.

*ω*/(

*u*

_{c}

*κ*

_{0}) and then dividing by the variance such that

*μ*asThe term

*μ*is a factor of order unity that depends on the shape of the wave orbital velocity spectrum. For narrowband waves,

*μ*= 1. From the above definitions,

*F*

_{2}(0) =

*μ*, and

*y*=

*u*

_{c}

*κ*

_{0}

*t*. The term

*P*

_{11}is defined such that

*F*

_{3}as a function of the two parameters

*u*

_{c}

*κ*

_{0}/

*ω*

_{w}and

*σ*

_{w}

*κ*

_{0}/

*ω*

_{w}and the wave spectrum shape factor

*μ*.

##### 1) High-frequency limit

*κ*/

*κ*

_{0}≫ 1 (

*s*′ ≫ 1), for positive

*s*,

*F*

_{1}reduces toThe term

*F*

_{1}is even, so for negative

*s*,

*x*in a Taylor expansion around

*x*(

*τ*).

*y*=

*u*

_{c}

*κ*

_{0}

*t*yieldsThe integral with respect to

*y*can be evaluated using standard integral tables, yieldingNow using the variable substitution

*I*by wave advection. This and similar expressions have been used previously to calculate dissipation rates from −5/3 fits to spectra in the presence of waves (e.g., Trowbridge and Elgar 2001).

##### 2) Low-frequency limit

*ω*<

*ω*

_{w}. Assuming

*F*

_{2}decays to zero quickly with increasing

*y*. The term

*F*

_{2}decays to zero more quickly and with fewer oscillations for broadband than narrowband waves.

*ω*relative to its constant value at small

*ω*isUsing the variable substitutions

*F*

_{1}(

*s*) occurs at

*s*= 1. Since the exponential in the outside integral has decay scale

*n*is the spectral density at frequency

*ω*

_{n}as a percentage of the spectral density for

*ω*→ 0. For

*n*= 90, Eq. (A14) yields

*n*= 90, all these criteria are satisfied if

#### b. Vertical velocity autospectrum for isotropic turbulence

*u*

_{3}along direction

*x*

_{1}in wavenumber space isThe remainder of the analysis follows that for the

*u*

_{1}autospectrum. The final result is given in Eqs. (21) and (22).

##### 1) High-frequency limit

*F*

_{1}and

*G*

_{1}. In the high-frequency limit,Therefore, in the high-frequency limit,where

*I*is the same as for the horizontal velocity autospectrum [Eq. (A10)].

##### 2) Low-frequency limit

*ω*relative to its constant value for very low frequencies is

#### c. Cospectrum for anisotropic turbulence

*s*=

*κ*

_{1}/

*κ*

_{0}. Substituting Eq. (A3) into Eq. (A20) givesNow, substituting this into Eq. (8) with the variable substitution

*y*=

*u*

_{c}

*κ*

_{0}

*t*yields

##### 1) High-frequency limit

*s*≫ 1), this expression reduces toThe integral with respect to

*y*can be evaluated using standard integral tables, yieldingNow using the variable substitution

*J*is the ratio of the spectral density in the −7/3 region in the presence of waves to that in the absence of waves and is analogous to

*I*for isotropic turbulence autospectra.

##### 2) Low-frequency limit

*P*

_{13}at frequencies

*ω*<

*ω*

_{w}follows the corresponding derivation for

*P*

_{11}exactly. In the low-frequency limit,

## REFERENCES

Benilov, A. Y., and B. N. Filyushkin, 1970: Application of methods of linear filtration to an analysis of fluctuations in the surface layer of the sea.

,*Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys.***6**, 810–819.Feddersen, F., 2010: Quality controlling surf zone acoustic Doppler velocimeter observations to estimate the turbulent dissipation rate.

,*J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.***27**, 2039–2055, doi:10.1175/2010JTECHO783.1.Feddersen, F., 2012: Observations of the surf-zone turbulent dissipation rate.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***42**, 386–399, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-11-082.1.Feddersen, F., and A. J. Williams III, 2007: Direct estimation of the Reynolds stress vertical structure in the nearshore.

,*J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.***24**, 102–116, doi:10.1175/JTECH1953.1.Feddersen, F., J. H. Trowbridge, and A. J. Williams III, 2007: Vertical structure of dissipation in the nearshore.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***37**, 1764–1777, doi:10.1175/JPO3098.1.Gerbi, G. P., J. H. Trowbridge, J. B. Edson, A. J. Plueddemann, E. A. Terray, and J. J. Fredericks, 2008: Measurements of momentum and heat transfer across the air–sea interface.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***38**, 1054–1072, doi:10.1175/2007JPO3739.1.Gerbi, G. P., J. H. Trowbridge, E. A. Terray, A. J. Plueddemann, and T. Kukulka, 2009: Observations of turbulence in the ocean surface boundary layer: Energetics and transport.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***39**, 1077–1096, doi:10.1175/2008JPO4044.1.Geyer, W. R., J. H. Trowbridge, and M. M. Bowen, 2000: The dynamics of a partially mixed estuary.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***30**, 2035–2048, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<2035:TDOAPM>2.0.CO;2.Jones, N. L., and S. G. Monismith, 2008: The influence of whitecapping waves on the vertical structure of turbulence in a shallow estuarine embayment.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***38**, 1563–1580, doi:10.1175/2007JPO3766.1.Kaimal, J. C., J. C. Wyngaard, Y. Izumi, and O. R. Cote, 1972: Spectral characteristics of surface layer turbulence.

,*Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.***98**, 563–589, doi:10.1002/qj.49709841707.Kirincich, A. R., S. J. Lentz, and G. P. Gerbi, 2010: Calculating Reynolds stresses from ADCP measurements in the presence of surface waves using the cospectra-fit method.

,*J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.***27**, 889–907, doi:10.1175/2009JTECHO682.1.Lentz, S. J., R. T. Guza, S. Elgar, F. Feddersen, and T. H. C. Herbers, 1999: Momentum balances on the North Carolina inner shelf.

,*J. Geophys. Res.***104**, 18 205–18 226, doi:10.1029/1999JC900101.Lumley, J. L., and E. A. Terray, 1983: Kinematics of turbulence convected by a random wave field.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***13**, 2000–2007, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013<2000:KOTCBA>2.0.CO;2.Pope, S. B., 2000:

*Turbulent Flows*. Cambridge University Press, 771 pp.Rosman, J. H., J. L. Hench, J. R. Koseff, and S. G. Monismith, 2008: Extracting Reynolds stresses from acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements in wave-dominated environments.

,*J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.***25**, 286–306, doi:10.1175/2007JTECHO525.1.Shaw, W. J., and J. H. Trowbridge, 2001: The direct estimation of near-bottom turbulent fluxes in the presence of energetic wave motions.

,*J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.***18**, 1540–1557, doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1540:TDEONB>2.0.CO;2.Taylor, G. I., 1938: The spectrum of turbulence.

,*Proc. Roy. Soc. London***A164**, 476–490, doi:10.1098/rspa.1938.0032.Trowbridge, J. H., and S. Elgar, 2001: Turbulence measurements in the surf zone.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***31**, 2403–2417, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<2403:TMITSZ>2.0.CO;2.Trowbridge, J. H., and S. Elgar, 2003: Spatial scales of stress-carrying nearshore turbulence.

,*J. Phys. Oceanogr.***33**, 1122–1128, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<1122:SSOSNT>2.0.CO;2.Wyngaard, J. C., and S. F. Clifford, 1977: Taylor’s hypothesis and high-frequency turbulence spectra.

,*J. Atmos. Sci.***34**, 922–929, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0922:THAHTS>2.0.CO;2.