CORRIGENDUM

Mary McRae Sustainable Engineering Department, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Mary McRae in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4406-1203
,
Ross A. Lee Sustainable Engineering Department, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Ross A. Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Scott Steinschneider Biological and Environmental Engineering Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Search for other papers by Scott Steinschneider in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Frank Galgano Department of Geography and the Environment, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Frank Galgano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mary McRae, mmcrae1@villanova.edu

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mary McRae, mmcrae1@villanova.edu

Our published paper (McRae et al. 2021) contains an error in the caption for Fig. 3. The caption in the published article incorrectly states that the data in Fig. 3a are for Tmin values and the data in Fig. 3b are for Tmax values. As indicated by the original figure panel titles and the description in the main text, in fact the opposite is true: the data in Fig. 3a are Tmax values and the data in Fig. 3b are Tmin values. The original Fig. 3 with the corrected caption is shown here. In addition, our published paper (McRae et al. 2021) contains an erroneous graph in Fig. 6. The graph shown in the published paper for Fig. 6b was incorrectly inserted and shows the results for the time period 2060–89 instead of the time period 2020–49; that is, it is a duplicate of the graph in Fig. 6d. The corrected Fig. 6 is shown here with the original caption and now shows the results for the time period 2020–49 in Fig. 6b. These errors do not impact the results of the published paper. The conclusions drawn in the paper remain valid without reservations.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

(a) The Tmax frequency of occurrence in mean number of days, Little Rock AFB, and RCP8.5 with 95% confidence interval. The graph starts at 25°C to see more clearly the temperatures at which the highest frequency occurs. (b) The Tmin frequency of occurrence in mean number of days, Little Rock AFB, and RCP8.5 with 95% confidence interval. The graph starts with 13°C to see more clearly the temperatures at which the highest frequency occurs.

Citation: Weather, Climate, and Society 13, 2; 10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0167.1

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Risk probability matrix for DA thresholds at Little Rock AFB, using the 20 GCMs identified in Table 1, RCP8.5, and monthly average station pressures for (a) observed (1970–99), (b) 2020–49, (c) 2040–69, and (d) 2060–89 (McRae 2018).

Citation: Weather, Climate, and Society 13, 2; 10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0167.1

REFERENCE

McRae, M., R. A. Lee, S. Steinschneider, and F. Galgano, 2021: Assessing aircraft performance in a warming climate. Wea. Climate Soc., 13, 3955, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0098.1.

  • Crossref
  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation
Save
  • McRae, M., R. A. Lee, S. Steinschneider, and F. Galgano, 2021: Assessing aircraft performance in a warming climate. Wea. Climate Soc., 13, 3955, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0098.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fig. 3.

    (a) The Tmax frequency of occurrence in mean number of days, Little Rock AFB, and RCP8.5 with 95% confidence interval. The graph starts at 25°C to see more clearly the temperatures at which the highest frequency occurs. (b) The Tmin frequency of occurrence in mean number of days, Little Rock AFB, and RCP8.5 with 95% confidence interval. The graph starts with 13°C to see more clearly the temperatures at which the highest frequency occurs.

  • Fig. 6.

    Risk probability matrix for DA thresholds at Little Rock AFB, using the 20 GCMs identified in Table 1, RCP8.5, and monthly average station pressures for (a) observed (1970–99), (b) 2020–49, (c) 2040–69, and (d) 2060–89 (McRae 2018).

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 101 0 0
Full Text Views 503 314 164
PDF Downloads 148 32 3