Funding for this project was provided by NOAA/Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research under NOAA–University of Oklahoma Cooperative Agreements NA11OAR4320072 and NA12OAR4590120, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Ahlborn, L., Franc J. M. , and Med D. S. , 2012: Tornado hazard communication disparities among Spanish-speaking individuals in an English-speaking community. Prehosp. Disaster Med., 27, 98–102, doi:10.1017/S1049023X12000015.
Brooks, H. E., and Doswell C. A. , 2002: Deaths in the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornado from a historical perspective. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 354–361, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0354:DITMOC>2.0.CO;2.
Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi P. K. , 1990: Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. J. Econometrics, 46, 347–364.
Chan, E. H., Vikram S. , Conrad C. , and Brownstein J. S. , 2011: Using web search query data to monitor dengue epidemics: A new model for neglected tropical disease surveillance. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 5, e1206, doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001206.
Chew, C., and Eysenbach G. , 2010: Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE, 5, e14118, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014118.
Donner, W. R., Rodriguez H. , and Diaz W. , 2012: Tornado warnings in three southern states: A qualitative analysis of public response patterns. J. Homeland Security Emerg. Manage.,9, doi:10.1515/1547-7355.1955.
Doswell, C. A., Moller A. R. , and Brooks H. E. , 1999: Storm spotting and public awareness since the first tornado forecasts of 1948. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 544–557, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0544:SSAPAS>2.0.CO;2.
Gelman, A., and Hill J. , 2006: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press, 625 pp.
Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi M. H. , Patel R. S. , Brammer L. , Smolinski M. S. , and Brilliant L. , 2009: Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature, 457, 1012–1014, doi:10.1038/nature07634.
Greene, W. H., 2011: Econometric Analysis.7th ed. Prentice Hall, 1232 pp.
Hansen, L. K., Arvidsson A. , Nielsen F. A. , Colleoni E. , and Etter M. , 2011: Good friends, bad news—Affect and virality in Twitter. Future Info. Technol., 185, 34–43, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_5.
Hoang, T.-A., Lim E.-P. , Achananuparp P. , Jiang J. , and Zhu F. , 2011: On modeling virality of Twitter content. Digital Libraries: For Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation, Springer, 212–221, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24826-9_27.
Hong, L., Dan O. , and Davison B. D. , 2011: Predicting popular messages in twitter. Proc. 20th Int. Conf. on the World Wide Web, Hyderabad, India, Association for Computing Machinery, 57–58, doi:10.1145/1963192.1963222.
Joslyn, S., and Savelli S. , 2010: Communicating forecast uncertainty: Public perception of weather forecast uncertainty. Meteor. Appl., 17, 180–195, doi:10.1002/met.190.
Lampos, V., and Cristianini N. , 2010: Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the social web. Second Int. Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing, Elba, Italy, IEEE, 411–416, doi:10.1109/CIP.2010.5604088.
Lindell, M. K., and Perry R. W. , 2012: The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal., 32, 616–632, doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x.
Morss, R. E., Demuth J. L. , and Lazo J. K. , 2008: Communicating uncertainty in weather forecasts: A survey of the U.S. public. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 974–991, doi:10.1175/2008WAF2007088.1.
NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center, 2012: United States tornadoes of 2011. [Available online at www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/2011-NOAA-NWS-tornado-facts.pdf.]
Ripberger, J. T., 2011: Capturing curiosity: Using internet search trends to measure public attentiveness. Policy Stud. J., 39, 239–259, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.x.
Sakaki, T., Okazaki M. , and Matsuo Y. , 2010: Earthquake shakes Twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors. Proc. 19th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, New York, NY, ACM, 851–860, doi:10.1145/1772690.1772777.
Scharkow, M., and Vogelgesang J. , 2011: Measuring the public agenda using search engine queries. Int. J. Public Opin. Res., 23, 104–113, doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq048.
Schmidlin, T. W., King P. S. , Hammer B. O. , and Ono Y. , 1998: Risk factors for death in the 22–23 February 1998 Florida tornadoes. Quick Response Rep. 106. [Available online at www.colorado.edu/hazards/research/qr/qr106/qr106.html.]
Sorensen, J., 2000: Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress. Nat. Hazards Rev., 1, 119–125, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119).
Szomszor, M., Kostkova P. , and de Quincey E. , 2012: #Swineflu: Twitter predicts swine flu outbreak in 2009. Electronic Healthcare, M. Szomszor and P. Kostkova, Eds., Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, Vol. 69, Springer, 18–26, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23635-8_3.
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger T. O. , Sandner P. G. , and Welpe I. M. , 2010: Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proc. Fourth Int. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, AAAI, 178–185. [Available online at www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1441/1852.]
Wilson, K., and Brownstein J. S. , 2009: Early detection of disease outbreaks using the internet. Can. Med. Assoc. J., 180, 829, doi:10.1503/cmaj.1090215.
The collection of these data and the protection of the user identity are undertaken using a protocol approved by the University of Oklahoma Internal Review Board for the protection of human subjects.
Note that the “blank” spots in Fig. 1 represent days when our program was unable to collect and archive Twitter data because of errors in the data collection process. In most instances, these errors were caused by interruptions in our access to Twitter’s API. In the analysis that follows, data associated with these days are coded as missing (NA).
Like most regression techniques, negative binomial regression models are sensitive to autocorrelation and nonlinearity. To ensure that our models were robust to these sensitivities, we specified a number of alternative models that included 1- and 2-day distributed lag terms and a variety of transformed and polynomial terms. These additions did not improve the fit of the models, which suggests that they are robust to these sensitivities.
We used the regression-based tests outlined by Cameron and Trivedi (1990) to test for overdispersion.
Incident rate ratios were calculated by exponentiating the coefficients in the model.
As suggested by Gelman and Hill (2006), we used analysis of variance (deviance) to confirm this “null” finding. As expected, adding the tornado parameters to models 7 and 8 did not produce a statistically significant improvement in model fit. It is possible, however, that our sample size (n = 190) is too small to detect an independent and significant effect for tornadoes, which are (by design) correlated with the other variables in the model (warnings and watches). As such, readers should interpret this null finding for tornadoes with some caution.