Statistical Forecasts Based on the National Meteorological Center's Numerical Weather Prediction System

Gary M. Carter Techniques Development Laboratory, NMC, NWS, NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Gary M. Carter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Paul Dallavalle Techniques Development Laboratory, NMC, NWS, NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by J. Paul Dallavalle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Harry R. Glahn Techniques Development Laboratory, NMC, NWS, NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Harry R. Glahn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

The production of interpretive weather element forecasts from dynamical model output variables is now an integral part of the centralized guidance systems of weather services throughout the world. The statistical forecasting system in the United States probably generates the most extensive suite of operational products, although other nations including Australia, Canada, France, Italy, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom also routinely provide guidance for many weather elements and locations.

The United States' statistical guidance system has evolved throughout the past 20 yr. The two principal formulation methods that have been employed are the model output statistics (MOS) and “perfect prog” approaches. These techniques have advantages and disadvantages that influence both aggregate and specific day-to-day performance characteristics of the associated weather element forecasts. Verification results indicate that forecasts from both statistical approaches provide useful guidance for most weather elements and projections for locations throughout the contiguous United States and Alaska. The MOS forecasts have generally been superior to the perfect prog guidance; the drawback to MOS is the necessity to rely on a relatively stable numerical prediction model. As dynamical models change and increase in skill, the perfect prog approach may be preferred for some applications.

Abstract

The production of interpretive weather element forecasts from dynamical model output variables is now an integral part of the centralized guidance systems of weather services throughout the world. The statistical forecasting system in the United States probably generates the most extensive suite of operational products, although other nations including Australia, Canada, France, Italy, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom also routinely provide guidance for many weather elements and locations.

The United States' statistical guidance system has evolved throughout the past 20 yr. The two principal formulation methods that have been employed are the model output statistics (MOS) and “perfect prog” approaches. These techniques have advantages and disadvantages that influence both aggregate and specific day-to-day performance characteristics of the associated weather element forecasts. Verification results indicate that forecasts from both statistical approaches provide useful guidance for most weather elements and projections for locations throughout the contiguous United States and Alaska. The MOS forecasts have generally been superior to the perfect prog guidance; the drawback to MOS is the necessity to rely on a relatively stable numerical prediction model. As dynamical models change and increase in skill, the perfect prog approach may be preferred for some applications.

Save