Evaluation of HRRR wind speed forecast and WindNinja downscaling accuracy during Santa Ana wind events in southern California

Daisuke Seto a Earth Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA

Search for other papers by Daisuke Seto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Charles Jones a Earth Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
b Department of Geography, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA

Search for other papers by Charles Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David Siuta c Southern California Edison, Irwindale, CA

Search for other papers by David Siuta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Natalie Wagenbrenner d US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT

Search for other papers by Natalie Wagenbrenner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Callum Thompson a Earth Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA

Search for other papers by Callum Thompson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nathan Quinn c Southern California Edison, Irwindale, CA

Search for other papers by Nathan Quinn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

Santa Ana winds are dry offshore downslope windstorms, commonly observed during autumn and winter across southwestern California in the United States. The accuracy of real-time Santa Ana wind forecasts is crucial for wildfire-related emergency management and decision-making. This research utilizes the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service’s diagnostic wind flow model WindNinja (WN) and evaluates 1) the accuracy of 10-m sustained wind speed from an operational coarse resolution mesoscale forecast model and 2) the relative accuracy of high spatial resolution WN downscaled simulations during six Santa Ana wind events. NOAA High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) 6-hr forecasts with 3-km grid spacing were used as inputs to WN to downscale sustained wind speeds to 500-m horizontal grids. Validation with weather stations shows that WN improved the overall forecast accuracy by 13%, on average, relative to HRRR forecasts. Improvements were also recorded in 71.6% of all weather stations used. However, overall WN skill scores declined at higher observed wind speeds. HRRR wind speed forecasts have an overall tendency to overpredict at lower observed wind speeds but underpredict at higher wind speeds. Downscaling increased negative wind speed biases of input HRRR forecasts even more at stations located in wind-prone lee-slope canyons. In contrast, stations located at well-exposed ridgetop sites benefitted from downscaling when the stations had negative input HRRR forecast biases, given that the ridgetops were sufficiently resolved in WN.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Daisuke Seto, d_seto@ucsb.edu

Abstract

Santa Ana winds are dry offshore downslope windstorms, commonly observed during autumn and winter across southwestern California in the United States. The accuracy of real-time Santa Ana wind forecasts is crucial for wildfire-related emergency management and decision-making. This research utilizes the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service’s diagnostic wind flow model WindNinja (WN) and evaluates 1) the accuracy of 10-m sustained wind speed from an operational coarse resolution mesoscale forecast model and 2) the relative accuracy of high spatial resolution WN downscaled simulations during six Santa Ana wind events. NOAA High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) 6-hr forecasts with 3-km grid spacing were used as inputs to WN to downscale sustained wind speeds to 500-m horizontal grids. Validation with weather stations shows that WN improved the overall forecast accuracy by 13%, on average, relative to HRRR forecasts. Improvements were also recorded in 71.6% of all weather stations used. However, overall WN skill scores declined at higher observed wind speeds. HRRR wind speed forecasts have an overall tendency to overpredict at lower observed wind speeds but underpredict at higher wind speeds. Downscaling increased negative wind speed biases of input HRRR forecasts even more at stations located in wind-prone lee-slope canyons. In contrast, stations located at well-exposed ridgetop sites benefitted from downscaling when the stations had negative input HRRR forecast biases, given that the ridgetops were sufficiently resolved in WN.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Daisuke Seto, d_seto@ucsb.edu
Save