Abstract
Probabilistic forecasts of excessive rainfall based on the fraction of High Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF) members predicting precipitation above a given threshold are used widely in predicting excessive rainfall; however, there is not yet a published study evaluating the skill of these forecasts. In this study, we document the performance of these forecasts over a three-year period, including regional and seasonal variations in skill. We find that there is considerable sensitivity to how excessive rainfall events are defined, especially in regions with large differences in number of excessive rainfall events between different datasets. When verifying against Stage IV exceedances of flash flood guidance (FFG), both the 0000 UTC and 1200 UTC HREF probabilities of exceeding 6-h FFG thresholds exhibit higher Brier Skill Score (BSS) than the operational 0900 UTC day-one excessive rainfall outlook (ERO) in five of eight regions in the CONUS, while probabilities of exceeding fixed 6-h or 12-h precipitation thresholds provide higher BSS than the ERO in another two regions. There is regional variability in the thresholds providing the highest BSS, with FFG (or 75% of FFG) generally providing the best forecasts in the eastern US, but fixed thresholds providing the best forecasts in the western US. Only in the southeastern US are threshold-based HREF forecasts unable to beat the ERO. 1200 UTC HREF-based forecasts using regionally optimal thresholds beat the ERO by 25-30% in terms of BSS. Our results suggest that HREF probabilities of exceeding precipitation thresholds have considerable value for excessive rainfall prediction.
© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).
