1. Introduction
The classic view of the monsoon has been founded on the existence of a strong contrast in heating between the ocean and land, with the monsoon itself manifesting as an enormous sea breeze (Halley 1686). However, this depiction of monsoon dynamics fails to account for some of the observed behaviors of the monsoon, including abrupt delayed onset and the active-break cycle, and does not consider the impact of planetary rotation on such a large-scale flow. An alternative view that considers the monsoon as a seasonal displacement of the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) into the subtropics has recently gained support (e.g., Chao and Chen 2001; Gadgil 2003). It is this latter view that is the focus of this work.
The observed zonally averaged monsoon flow (not shown) depicts a global meridional circulation cell with ascent in the monsoon region, outflow that crosses into the winter hemisphere aloft, subsidence in the winter hemisphere Tropics, and cross-equatorial return flow at low levels. Using a linear shallow-water model, Gill (1980) found that a localized prescribed forcing in the off-equatorial Tropics induces a cross-equatorial circulation similar to the observed monsoon flow. However, Held and Hou (1980), Lindzen and Hou (1988), and Plumb and Hou (1992) determined the axisymmetric Hadley circulation to be fundamentally nonlinear, and predicated upon the conservation of angular momentum in the free troposphere. The intent of this work is to explore the validity of the nonlinear, axisymmetric theory of the steady Hadley circulation in describing the dynamics of the monsoon.


There has been interest in the application of the theory of threshold behavior to explain certain aspects of the monsoon. Plumb and Hou hypothesized that the abrupt onset of the monsoon might be related to this threshold behavior. Eltahir and Gong (1996) found that the subtropical meridional gradient of subcloud moist entropy was positively correlated with the strength of the West African monsoon.
There are several limitations to the existing nonlinear theory of the Hadley circulation. First, the work of Held and Hou (1980), Lindzen and Hou (1988), and Plumb and Hou (1992) is in a dry framework with an assigned distribution of radiative equilibrium temperature. In these cases, the induced circulation does not affect the forcing field, while, in the real world, the forcing is highly dependent upon the circulation. For the moist experiments of Emanuel (1995) and Zheng (1998), a prescribed SST perturbation was used to force the atmosphere, with radiative convective equilibrium temperatures following a moist adiabat to communicate the surface forcing throughout the troposphere. Over a dry landmass forced by surface fluxes, the vertical column follows close to a dry adiabat, and upper-level temperatures may be relatively cold even though the lower-tropospheric temperatures are high. This raises the question of whether strong sensible heat fluxes over an arid continent are sufficient to induce a monsoonal circulation. Also, given the interaction possible between the circulation and the forcing, the location and extent of the monsoon are not predictable from the radiative convective equilibrium state.
A second limitation is that the nonlinear theory is concerned with the steady-state circulation, rather than the transient monsoon. The time scale for circulations to reach a steady state in axisymmetric models is frequently quite long, on the order of hundreds of days, which is much greater than the seasonal time scale associated with monsoons. Fang and Tung (1999) found that the abrupt increase in circulation strength observed when the steady forcing is shifted off of the equator was not seen when transient forcing was used.
In addition to the theory and models of the Hadley circulation, axisymmetry has been applied specifically to monsoon circulations, such as the work of Webster (1983) and Goswami and Shukla (1984). These two studies focused on the intraseasonal variability of the monsoon and showed that interaction between the dynamics of the monsoon flow and surface heat fluxes significantly contributes to the transient behavior of the monsoon. We wish to take a similar approach as in these seminal papers, but with a focus on the steady-state monsoon.
To address the applicability of the nonlinear axisymmetric theory of Hadley circulations to the interactive monsoon, we wish to address the following questions:
How does the presence of a subtropical continent with interactive forcing affect the monsoon circulation?
What determines the location and extent of the monsoon?
Is the steady monsoon circulation representative of the dynamics of the transient monsoon?
An axisymmetric general circulation model is used to explore these questions.
This paper focuses on axisymmetric modeling as a first step toward developing an understanding of the large-scale monsoon circulation. The observed monsoon is strongly asymmetric, so that the applicability of a strict axisymmetric theory is questionable. The question of asymmetry of the flow will be addressed in a companion paper; the current work seeks to address only the purely axisymmetric case.
There is a wide gap in modeling the monsoon between the highly idealized axisymmetric theory and full GCM studies with realistic physics. While the axisymmetric theory is useful for developing an understanding of the basic physical mechanisms that drive and affect the monsoon, it is unclear how the simplifications that are involved limit the applicability to the monsoon. On the other hand, the wealth of feedbacks present in the full GCM studies make diagnosis of the monsoon behavior extremely difficult. The goal of this work is to bridge the gap between the idealized axisymmetric theory and the more complex, interactive monsoon. A general circulation model with simplified representations of some physical processes and with idealized continental geometry is chosen to achieve intermediate complexity, as described in section 2. This allows for a reasonably more realistic portrayal of processes that are suspected to be intrinsic to the monsoon, while at the same time reducing the feedbacks to make analysis more tractable.
The first step is to characterize the Hadley response to a steady local subtropical forcing in an aquaplanet setup. The aquaplanet cases act as a basis of comparison for the later, more complex, cases with a subtropical continent. The subtropical forcing takes the form of an SST perturbation, the form of which is designed to mimic the presence of a landmass in order to allow direct comparison with continental experiments. The results of the aquaplanet cases are described in section 3, where it is found that threshold behavior of the meridional circulation is seen as predicted by Plumb and Hou (1992) and Emanuel (1995). It is found that the strength of the circulation weakens as the forcing is shifted poleward.
Next, a simple subtropical continent is introduced with perpetual summer forcing, and comparison with the aquaplanet experiments helps to determine the impact of continental physics on the monsoon circulation. These experiments are discussed in section 4. Threshold behavior of the circulation strength is not observed as clearly as in the aquaplanet cases, although the circulation does show a transition from local to global extent, as predicted by the nonlinear theory. A theory of monsoon location is introduced in section 5. The boundary layer thermodynamics are shown to control the extent and location of the monsoon region such that the zero line of the circulation must be coincident with the maximum in subcloud moist static energy. Over the ocean, the moist static energy is closely related to the surface temperature, while over a land surface, the moist static energy is controlled by a balance between advection by the large-scale flow and surface heat fluxes.
Finally, seasonally varying forcing is implemented over the landmass to contrast with the perpetual summer cases to explore the applicability of the steady solutions to the transient monsoon. Section 6 addresses these experiments. The transient response approaches the perpetual summer circulation by mid- to late summer, but the early summer state is not close to the steady result. The time scale for the transient response is that needed for the large-scale overturning circulation to fold over the contours of angular momentum across the tropical upper troposphere. The overall findings are discussed in section 7.
2. Model
The model used is the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) General Circulation Model (MITGCM), release 1.0. The MITGCM consists of a dynamical core coupled to an atmospheric physics package; the dynamical kernel of the model is described by Marshall et al. (2004). The atmospheric MITGCM has been tested extensively against Held and Suarez (1994), although a different atmospheric physics package is implemented here. The model grid space used is a partial sphere between 64°S and 64°N, with 40 pressure levels in the vertical at 25-mb intervals. A staggered spherical polar grid is used with 4° latitudinal resolution. There is no orography, and the surface is assigned to the 1012.5-mb pressure level. The coefficient of vertical viscosity is 10 Pa2 s−1, and an eighth-order Shapiro filter is employed to reduce horizontal noise in the temperature, humidity, and horizontal flow fields.


The moist convective scheme of Emanuel (1991) is used, including the modifications of Emanuel and Živković-Rothman (1999). The convective parameters used as part of this scheme have been optimized against observed data from the Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (Emanuel and Živković-Rothman 1999). The convection scheme includes dry adiabatic adjustment, which is performed over regions that are unstable to unsaturated ascent. A mixed layer of momentum is included at the lowest 200 mb of the model; in this layer, horizontal velocities are homogenized over a time scale of 500 s.




3. Aquaplanet


a. Subtropical threshold behavior
Two criteria are used to determine whether the modeled Hadley circulations are in agreement with the nonlinear theory: 1) conservation of angular momentum across the upper branch of the circulation cell, 2) existence of threshold behavior of the circulation strength as described by Plumb and Hou (1992) and Emanuel (1995). The ocean forcing is located at ϕ0 = 16°N (5); this latitude is chosen as representative of a subtropical monsoon. The strength of the applied SST perturbation [ΔT in (5)] is varied from 0.5 to 2.5 K.
Threshold behavior of the circulation strength is clearly observed with critical ΔT = 1.25 K (Fig. 2). When the SST perturbation is small, the resulting circulation is weak, and the upper-tropospheric absolute vorticity does not approach the critical value at zero. Above the threshold forcing, the circulation intensifies much more rapidly with increased ΔT, and the upper-level absolute vorticity is close to zero. When forcing levels are below the threshold, the circulation is confined to one hemisphere and does not cross the equator (Fig. 3). Above the threshold forcing, the circulation becomes cross-equatorial and considerably stronger (Fig. 3). In these cases, the upper-tropospheric absolute vorticity is close to zero in the circulation cell (Fig. 2), which indicates conservation of angular momentum.
b. Cross-equatorial flow
There is a tendency for cross-equatorial circulations to jump in the lower troposphere when approaching the equator (e.g., Fig. 3). While some of the flow crosses the equator in the free troposphere, a portion of the circulation is confined to the Southern Hemisphere, giving the streamfunction the appearance of two conjoined Hadley cells. This flow pattern results in a secondary precipitation maximum (not shown) in the Southern Hemisphere Tropics between the equator and 6°S. The moisture content of the low-level flow is depleted during the jump as the air rises to the midtroposphere, but is replenished through large latent heat fluxes at the surface in the Northern Hemisphere. Jumping also alters the streamfunction intensity. When jumping does not occur, the maximum streamfunction of the cross-equatorial circulation is located in the lower troposphere near the equator. The initiation of jumping eliminates the lower-tropospheric streamfunction maximum, and the circulation maximum occurs in the upper troposphere. Double ITCZs are more common in atmospheric models than in the observed atmosphere (Zhang 2001); however, the secondary precipitation maximum seen in the present model results is not considered to be a doubled ITCZ.
Jumping of the meridional circulation has been addressed extensively by Pauluis (2001); a brief synopsis is given here. A pressure gradient across the equator is needed in the mixed layer in order to allow cross-equatorial flow. When the mixed layer is thin or the pressure gradient is weak, only a limited mass flux is possible in the mixed layer, so flow attempting to cross the equator must rise into the free troposphere in order to cross. In a moist atmosphere, the vertical moist stability near the equator is weak, and the resulting jump is quite deep. In the modeled case with uniform ocean SSTs, the pressure gradient across the equator is very weak, sometimes even increasing northward, so that cross-equatorial flow is strongly inhibited even though the mixed layer is quite deep. An example of an aquaplanet case in which the flow does not jump at the equator is seen in the bottom left panel of Fig. 4, where the SST has a maximum at 8°N and a southward-decreasing SST gradient across the equator.
c. Latitudinal influence on circulation
A series of aquaplanet experiments are made with uniform SST and a localized boreal hemisphere SST perturbation, which is varied in location. The form of the perturbation is given by (5), with ϕ0 varied from 0° to 26°N, and ΔT is chosen to be 4.25 K. This high value of ΔT was chosen to yield cross-equatorial circulations for the entire range of ϕ0 tested.
The impact of the location of the forcing on the strength of the circulation is illustrated in Fig. 5. The maximum streamfunction increases as ϕ0 is moved poleward from 0° to 6°N, although the circulation width only broadens slightly (not shown), with no sign of jumping behavior. These results are in accord with the findings of Lindzen and Hou (1988), who showed that the Hadley circulation strengthens as the peak forcing is moved poleward in the near equatorial region. As ϕ0 moves from 6° to 10°N, the circulation nearly doubles in width (not shown) but decreases sharply in strength as jumping initiates and the lower-tropospheric streamfunction maximum is destroyed. As ϕ0 is moved poleward from 10° to 22°N, the circulation decreases in strength and broadens slightly. As the circulation broadens, the easterly jet intensifies significantly, resulting in greater viscous effects with weakening angular momentum conservation in the upper branch of the circulation. This increased viscosity, peculiar to numerical models, is hypothesized to account for the gradual weakening of the circulation as the forcing is shifted poleward. The ϕ0 = 24N case is close to the local-to-global AMC transition as described by Schneider (1983), but far above the critical threshold for the existence of an AMC circulation (Plumb and Hou 1992). Schneider showed that an angular momentum conserving circulation forced by a δ-function source undergoes a transition from a cell of regional extent to a cross-equatorial cell as the forcing is increased; the transition forcing needed is greater when the forcing is moved poleward. The proximity to this transition is the likely cause of the sharp reduction in streamfunction magnitude from ϕ0 = 22° to 24°N. With a weaker ΔT, the transition to a local circulation occurs with ϕ0 closer to the equator.
4. Continental cases


a. Uniform SST
First, a series of experiments are performed wherein the ocean is assigned uniform temperature. The only difference between this case and the previous aquaplanet case with localized SST perturbation at 16°N is the replacement of the prescribed SST perturbation with an interactive continent in the boreal hemisphere.
For the weakest continental forcing tested, THF0 = 120 W m−2, no monsoon occurs and there is little precipitation over the continent (not shown). The meridional circulation is limited to a very weak, shallow circulation just along the coastline, with subsidence in the mid- and upper troposphere over the continental subtropics.
When the land forcing is increased to 125 ≤ THF0 ≤ 130 W m−2, deep moist convection commences over the subtropical continent. Large-scale ascent occurs along the coastline, with a latitudinally narrow meridional circulation with subsidence over the tropical ocean (Fig. 4). The upper-tropospheric absolute vorticity (dotted line with squares, Fig. 6) is not close to the critical value at zero, and the deep circulation is not strongly angular momentum conserving.
For land forcing of THF0 ≥ 135 W m−2, the meridional circulation is more global in extent, with ascent over the subtropical continent and subsidence over the Southern Hemisphere ocean (Fig. 4). Jumping of the circulation occurs for all cases with cross-equatorial flow, and becomes more pronounced as the land surface forcing increases. The upper-level tropical easterly jet (not shown) is very strong, which is a common feature in axisymmetric models. The angular momentum field (not shown) is significantly distorted by the circulation, although the flow is able to cross some contours of angular momentum in the Tropics, where there is strong easterly shear. As the land forcing is increased, the circulation broadens and the monsoon region moves inland, as shown in Fig. 7.
Although the strength of the meridional circulation increases systematically with increased land surface forcing (dotted line with squares in Fig. 6), there is little indication of threshold behavior. The upper-level absolute vorticity (Fig. 6) gradually approaches the critical value at zero for THF0 ≥ 140 W m−2, but a cross-equatorial circulation develops when the vorticity is still subcritical (THF0 = 135 W m−2). The threshold behavior (Fig. 6) may be compared with that of the aquaplanet case in Fig. 2.
b. Summer SST


First, an aquaplanet case with the summer-like SST profile (7) is performed. In this case, the cross-equatorial winter Hadley cell dominates with a much weaker summer cell confined to the warmer hemisphere poleward of the SST maximum (Fig. 4). The Hadley cells nearly conserve angular momentum. The ascent region and the precipitation maximum (not shown) are located slightly equatorward of the SST maximum.
When a subtropical continent is added with this summer-like SST distribution, the overall meridional circulation is visually similar in appearance to a simple superposition of the flow from the summer-like aquaplanet case (Fig. 4) and the previous continental cases with uniform SST. Over the tropical ocean, a strong meridional cell forms as a result of the SST distribution: ascent occurs in the boreal hemisphere near the SST maximum.
These results may be compared with the previous continental cases with uniformly warm ocean. For weak land forcing (THF0 ≤ 135 W m−2), the streamfunction over the continent is almost twice as strong in the summer SST case as in the uniform SST case (dot–dash line with asterisks in Fig. 6a), but for THF0 ≥ 140 W m−2, the circulation is similar in intensity. The 150-mb absolute vorticity over the continent is near the critical value of zero for THF0 ≥ 135 W m−2 (dot–dash line with asterisks in Fig. 6); however, there is no sign of threshold behavior of the circulation strength.
c. Threshold behavior
Why does the aquaplanet case show clear threshold behavior while the continental case does not? There are two factors that contribute to this difference in behavior. In the aquaplanet setup, there are strong feedbacks between the circulation and the surface fluxes, especially the latent heat flux. As the circulation intensifies, the surface winds increase, which enhances the surface heat fluxes and in turn strengthens the circulation; this type of interaction has been coined the wind-induced surface heat exchange (WISHE) feedback (Emanuel 1986). Threshold behavior might be exaggerated by WISHE, which would tend to strengthen already strong circulations but has less impact on weak circulations. However, these feedbacks do not occur over the continent given the constrained surface forcing.
Second, the location of large-scale ascent moves poleward with increased surface forcing (Fig. 7) in the continental case, but is nearly stationary in the aquaplanet case. As shown previously (Fig. 5), the circulation tends to weaken as the ascent region moves poleward through the subtropics; this would act to obscure threshold behavior in the continental case.
d. Seasonal
After the land surface forcing has reached the peak strength in the perpetual summer cases, there is a transient period prior to establishment of a steady circulation. During this time, precipitation initiates over the coastal continent and gradually moves poleward as the meridional circulation strengthens and broadens. This transient period is nearly 200 days long—considerably greater than a seasonal time scale. It is not obvious that the nonlinear theory, which is based upon a steady-state circulation, is applicable to the highly transient monsoon. There is a delay in onset of jumping of the circulation during the transient period which questions the importance of the jumping behavior to the seasonal, transient monsoon. A series of experiments with seasonally varying land forcing are performed in order to investigate the pertinence of the steady state, perpetual summer results to the seasonal monsoon.
To retain simplicity, the ocean SST does not vary in time and is uniformly 302 K at all latitudes. To represent seasonal variation in radiative forcing, THF0 is varied sinusoidally in time from 80 W m−2 at winter solstice to the maximum summer value, with period of 365 days. The summer solstice magnitude of THF0 is varied from 125 to 150 W m−2, as in the perpetual summer cases. Although this distribution of surface forcing is far from realistic, it allows comparison with the previous perpetual summer experiments. Because of the unrealistic choice of ocean surface temperatures, the results are not expected to be suitable for study of the dynamics of monsoon onset. The model is first spun up in a winter solstice regime for 200 days, then the seasonal cycle is initiated, and the model is run for five annual periods. For all cases tested, the circulation and precipitation fields quickly adjusted to the seasonal cycle, and there was very strong interannual consistency. The last four years of the model run were averaged to create a mean annual progression.
For land forcing of THF0 ≤ 130 W m−2, the summer monsoon is weak, with a shallow capped meridional circulation over the subtropical continent. Little precipitation occurs over the continent during the summer season (Fig. 8). For stronger land forcing (THF0 ≥ 140 W m−2), large-scale ascent and deep convection form over the subtropical continent during the summer (Fig. 8). The precipitation maximum over the boreal tropical ocean at first weakens during spring, then shifts poleward onto the continent and intensifies during the course of the summer. At the beginning of fall, the continental precipitation maximum weakens abruptly, the rainfall peak then continues to migrate poleward during the winter until it dies out the following spring. During early summer, the meridional circulation is local (Fig. 9), with ascent over the subtropical continent and subsidence over the Northern Hemisphere tropical ocean. As the summer progresses, the circulation strengthens and broadens, with increased cross-equatorial flow (not shown). By the late summer, the circulation is quite broad, and jumping behavior occurs, as shown in Fig. 9.
The seasonal cases show that the steady-state solutions are pertinent to the seasonal monsoon during late summer only. The mean summer net surface flux between 1 June and 31 August in the seasonal case is approximately 10 W m−2 less than the solstice THF0. In the seasonal experiment, the THF0 ≤ 130 W m−2 cases have a mean summer THF0 ≤ 125 W m−2 and do not result in a monsoon, which is similar to the perpetual summer results for THF0 < 125 W m−2. In the early and midsummer, the steady-state solution differs considerably from the seasonal monsoon. The meridional circulation associated with the monsoon during early summer is localized in extent, confined to the boreal hemisphere. In mid-June, the circulation becomes cross equatorial and begins to fold over the contours of absolute angular momentum in the upper troposphere. The jumping behavior, which is a major feature of the steady-state solutions, is not observed until mid-July in the seasonal cases.
5. Theory of monsoon location
What determines the location of the monsoon precipitation and the size of the meridional circulation cell? Why does the monsoon tend to shift poleward with increased land forcing? With the help of a few assumptions, an extension of existing axisymmetric theory can explain much of the large-scale dynamics.














The summer hemisphere poleward limit, or boundary, of the cross-equatorial meridional circulation is seen in the previous model cases to be a zero streamfunction contour that is nearly vertical. Assuming a meridional circulation that conserves absolute angular momentum in the free troposphere, the circulation boundary must be located in a region of zero vertical wind shear. This can be seen by considering the vertical distribution of momentum as the boundary is approached from the monsoon region: at the boundary, there is flow into the column only in the boundary layer and out of the column only in the upper troposphere, with no other sources of momentum advection. Since there is net ascent in the monsoon region, the momentum must be constant throughout the vertical column in the troposphere. This makes the additional assumption of a vertical boundary rather than a slanting boundary, which is appropriate for the boundary of the ascending branch of the circulation, but not for the subsidence branch.
The statistical equilibrium theory (Emanuel et al. 1994) may be applied to this framework in order to tie the monsoon location to the subcloud moist static energy. Let us assume a forcing region in the subtropics, which results in a localized area of high subcloud moist static energy. For the sake of this argument, the forcing region is considered to be sufficiently strong to meet the threshold criteria for creation of an angular momentum conserving meridional circulation (Plumb and Hou 1992; Emanuel 1995). From (14), ∂u/∂p = 0 when either ∂T/∂p or ∂hb/∂y are zero. The vertical temperature gradient is nonzero, so the zero wind shear line, and thus the circulation boundary, will occur at the latitude at which hb is maximum or constant in latitude (∂hb/∂y = 0). Large-scale ascent will occur near and equatorward of this maximum in hb, with the boundary of the circulation coincident with the hb maximum. The precipitation is collocated with the large-scale ascent, so that the subcloud moist static energy distribution determines the location of the monsoon circulation and precipitation.
This theory can be tested with the model. An example of a monsoonal case showing the relationship between the circulation, zonal wind field, precipitation, and subcloud moist static energy is shown in Fig. 10. In the monsoon region, the zonal wind field is weak, with near-zero shear as required by the theory. The location of the poleward boundary of the monsoonal circulation cell is found to be coincident with the latitude of maximum subcloud moist static energy, with the precipitation peak occurring at or equatorward of this point. This correspondence between moist static energy and the monsoon location is found to hold in all of the modeled cases with a continent. However, in some of the aquaplanet cases, the ascent branch of the circulation is not closely AMC due to numerical filtering of the zonal wind by the Shapiro filter; in these cases the maximum subcloud hb is located slightly equatorward of the boundary of the meridional circulation.
What, then, determines the subcloud moist static energy distribution? In radiative convective equilibrium with this model setup, the subcloud moist static energy profile follows that of the prescribed continental net surface heat flux [THF(ϕ)], although the actual value of hb is constrained by moisture availability. In radiative convective equilibrium, the greatest subcloud moist static energy occurs where the net surface fluxes are largest, over the coastal continent. Once the meridional circulation develops, the low-level flow carries air from the oceans, which has lower subcloud moist static energy, over the coastal regions, locally reducing the moist static energy so that the maximum energy is located inland (Fig. 11). As the forcing is increased, the circulation also intensifies, with a greater flux of low moist static energy air being carried onto the continent which must be heated by the surface forcing to bring it to the radiative convective equilibrium (RCE) energy state. The inflowing air must travel further over the landmass while being heated from the surface to reach the maximum subcloud moist static energy. The steady solution is formed by a balance between the various tendencies of subcloud moist static energy.
6. Discussion
The monsoon is considered here as a seasonal relocation of the ITCZ onto a subtropical landmass, and as such, the dynamics of the Hadley circulation are fundamental to the monsoon. The dynamics of the steady Hadley circulation have been explored in a series of analytic studies by Held and Hou (1980), Lindzen and Hou (1988), Plumb and Hou (1992), and Emanuel (1995). However, the simple analytic theory does not consider the effects of a subtropical landmass, which forces the atmosphere differently from an aquaplanet or simple applied forcing, and does not account for onset or transient behavior.
The axisymmetric theory is extended to predict the extent of the meridional circulation and the location of the monsoon. The location of the deep ascent branch of an AMC circulation is found to be strongly tied to the distribution of subcloud moist static energy. Given a local maximum of subcloud moist static energy, the poleward boundary of the meridional circulation will be collocated with the maximum hb, and the large-scale ascent and precipitation will occur near and slightly equatorward of the maximum. Because the circulation itself interacts strongly with the subcloud moist static energy distribution, this theory is diagnostic rather than prognostic. However, the effect of various mechanisms upon the extent of the steady monsoon may be reduced to a determination of their impact upon the subcloud moist static energy. For example, orography can affect the subcloud moist static energy. Molnar and Emanuel (1999) have shown that the radiative-convective equilibrium surface air temperature decreases at a rate of approximately 2 K km−1 as the surface is raised, which is less steep of a decline than the moist adiabatic lapse rate. Assuming a moist adiabatic lapse rate, the saturation entropy will be greater over an elevated surface than over a lower surface receiving the same incoming radiation, and the subcloud moist static energy will also be greater.
How well do the modeled circulations conform to the theorized requirement of collocation of the circulation boundary with the maximum of subcloud moist static energy? The cases with subtropical continent uphold the theory quite well: the poleward boundary of the meridional circulation is collocated with the maximum subcloud moist static energy, and the monsoon precipitation occurs slightly equatorward of this maximum. The theory holds reasonably well for the aquaplanet cases, but there are a few examples in which the boundary of the circulation occurs poleward of the subcloud moist static energy maximum, and the ascending branch of the circulation has westerly shear with height. In these cases, the numerical filters break down angular momentum conservation in the ascent branch of the circulation, allowing vertical shear to develop.
The role of the land surface in forcing the monsoon circulation is revealed when the aquaplanet experiments are compared to the cases with subtropical continent. In an aquaplanet setup with localized SST perturbation at 16°N, the meridional circulation clearly exhibits threshold behavior, with a pronounced increase in the strength of the circulation for forcing above a critical magnitude. These strong circulations are nearly AMC, with upper-tropospheric absolute vorticity close to zero. When the SST perturbation is replaced with a subtropical continent, threshold behavior is not clearly seen when the land forcing strength is varied. However, the meridional circulations that develop for strong land forcing appear to be angular momentum conserving, with near-zero absolute vorticity in the upper troposphere.
The lack of threshold behavior in the two-dimensional cases with a subtropical continent in comparison to the prominence of the behavior in the aquaplanet situation is ascribed to a combination of factors. First, in the aquaplanet cases, there is a feedback between the circulation strength and the surface fluxes through the surface wind speed (WISHE). This feedback tends to accentuate threshold behavior of the circulation strength in the aquaplanet case. In the continental cases, the net surface flux is prescribed, so that this feedback will not occur, and the circulation strength is not expected to show as strong an increase above the threshold as in the aquaplanet cases.
A second, more subtle, factor is the poleward progression of the monsoon with increased forcing in the continental cases. A series of aquaplanet cases with varied location of the SST perturbation has shown that the circulation weakens as it extends further poleward. As the monsoon moves poleward in the continental cases, broadening the circulation, the circulation strength is expected to weaken somewhat, obscuring threshold behavior. In the aquaplanet cases, the strong latent heat fluxes in the vicinity of the SST maximum act to tie the subcloud moist energy maximum close to the SST maximum; whereas in the continental cases, the constraint of limited surface fluxes over the landmass leads to a different balance of the subcloud moist energy budget where advection plays a stronger role. As a result, the hb maximum over the continent is not necessarily collocated with the greatest surface fluxes. These results differ from the results of Webster (1983) and Goswami and Shukla (1984), who found that feedbacks between the circulation and the surface hydrology resulted in a poleward moving maximum in both latent and net heat fluxes and hence a poleward-moving monsoon.
The nonlinear theory concerns the steady-state circulation, but the real monsoon is a transient, seasonal phenomenon. The time scales needed to reach a steady state in the model are quite long, especially in the two- dimensional cases. The initial adjustment period occurs while the circulation folds over contours of constant angular momentum in the upper troposphere. In the experiments with time-varying land forcing, the transient monsoon circulation only bore a resemblance to the steady state during the late summer period. However, the ocean SST distribution used in these cases was far from realistic, which impacts the meridional circulation. In the real world, a cross-equatorial Hadley circulation forced by the ocean gradient exists prior to the onset of the monsoon, so that the momentum field is already significantly rearranged when the monsoon initiates. Fang and Tung (1999) found that the transient circulation was similar in strength to the steady circulation for off-equatorial forcing, which supports the idea that the steady-state dynamics may be applicable to the seasonal case.
The idealized physics used in this study neglects many important processes which may have substantial impacts upon the monsoon. The constraint of axisymmetry will be relaxed in Part II of this paper (Privé and Plumb 2007). The version of the MITGCM used here does not support orography, which may strongly influence the monsoon. The model has only the simplest representation of boundary layer physics, consisting of a momentum mixed layer of fixed depth and dry adiabatic adjustment of variable depth. The land surface hydrology is very primitive, and there is no allowance for vegetation or other surface biosphere components. Given the importance of boundary layer thermodynamics to the large-scale monsoon that has been emphasized in this study, the simplicity of the boundary layer representation in the model is a serious limitation. One important process that was omitted from the model is radiation. Although the use of Newtonian cooling makes the dynamics much more straightforward, the prescribed net radiative flux used to calculate the surface energy balance is not very realistic. The model neglects feedbacks from clouds, the radiative influence of water vapor, longwave feedbacks from the surface temperature, albedo and vegetative effects on radiation, all of which may impact the monsoon. A diurnal cycle is also not included in the model, which may impact the steady state.
Future work is suggested to investigate how different physical processes impact the subcloud moist static energy and the large-scale monsoon circulation. Important processes that were neglected from the idealized model used here include radiative feedbacks, orographic effects, and boundary layer physics. The theory linking the monsoon location to the subcloud moist static energy maximum may also be able to shed light on transient monsoon dynamics, such as onset and break monsoon.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant ATM-0436288; N. Privé received support from a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. Thanks to Kerry Emanuel, Elfatih Eltahir, John Marshall, Chris Hill, Olivier Pauluis, Jean-Michel Campin, and Ed Hill for helpful discussions. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviews whose helpful comments led to significant improvement of this paper.
REFERENCES
Chao, W. C., and B. Chen, 2001: The origin of monsoons. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 3497–3507.
Eltahir, E., and C. Gong, 1996: Dynamics of wet and dry years in West Africa. J. Climate, 9 , 1030–1042.
Emanuel, K. A., 1986: An air–sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part I: Steady-state maintenance. J. Atmos. Sci., 43 , 585–604.
Emanuel, K. A., 1991: A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J. Atmos. Sci., 48 , 2313–2335.
Emanuel, K. A., 1995: On thermally direct circulations in moist atmospheres. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 1529–1534.
Emanuel, K. A., and M. Živković-Rothman, 1999: Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 1766–1782.
Emanuel, K. A., J. D. Neelin, and C. S. Bretherton, 1994: On large-scale circulations in convecting atmospheres. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120 , 1111–1143.
Fang, M., and K. Tung, 1999: Time-dependent nonlinear Hadley circulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 1797–1807.
Gadgil, S., 2003: The Indian monsoon and its variability. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 31 , 429–467.
Gill, A. E., 1980: Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 106 , 447–462.
Goswami, B. N., and J. Shukla, 1984: Quasi-periodic oscillations in a symmetric general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 41 , 20–37.
Halley, E., 1686: An historical account of the trade winds, and monsoons, observable in the seas between and near the Tropicks, with an attempt to assign the phisical cause of said winds. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 26 , 153–168.
Held, I. M., and A. Y. Hou, 1980: Nonlinear axially symmetric circulations in a nearly inviscid atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 37 , 515–533.
Held, I. M., and M. J. Suarez, 1994: A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75 , 1825–1830.
Hide, R., 1969: Dynamics of the atmospheres of the major planets with an appendix on the viscous boundary layer at the rigid bounding surface of an electrically-conducting rotating fluid in the presence of a magnetic field. J. Atmos. Sci., 26 , 841–853.
Lindzen, R. S., and A. Y. Hou, 1988: Hadley circulations for zonally averaged heating off the equator. J. Atmos. Sci., 45 , 2416–2427.
Manabe, S., 1969: Climate and the ocean circulation: The atmospheric circulation and the hydrology of the earth’s surface. Mon. Wea. Rev., 97 , 739–773.
Marshall, J., A. Adcroft, J-M. Campin, and C. Hill, 2004: Atmosphere–ocean modeling exploiting fluid isomorphisms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 2882–2894.
Molnar, P., and K. Emanuel, 1999: Temperature profiles in radiative-convective equilibrium above surfaces at different heights. J. Geophys. Res., 104 , 24265–24271.
Pauluis, O., 2001: Axially symmetric circulations in a moist atmosphere. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Fluid Dynamics, Breckenridge, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc. CD-ROM, 4.12.
Plumb, R., and A. Hou, 1992: The response of a zonally symmetric atmosphere to subtropical forcing: Threshold behavior. J. Atmos. Sci., 49 , 1790–1799.
Privé, N. C., and R. A. Plumb, 2007: Monsoon dynamics with interactive forcing, Part II: Impact of eddies and asymmetric geometries. J. Atmos. Sci., 64 , 1431–1442.
Schneider, E., 1977: Axially symmetric steady-state models of the basic state for instability and climate studies. Part II: Nonlinear calculations. J. Atmos. Sci., 34 , 280–296.
Schneider, E., 1983: Martian great dust storms: Axially symmetric models. Icarus, 55 , 302–331.
Webster, P., 1983: Mechanisms of monsoon low-frequency variability: Surface hydrological effects. J. Atmos. Sci., 40 , 2110–2124.
Zhang, C., 2001: Double ITCZs. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , 11785–11792.
Zheng, X., 1998: The response of a moist zonally symmetric atmosphere to subtropical surface temperature perturbation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124 , 1209–1226.

Meridional SST profile (K) used in aquaplanet cases with localized subtropical SST perturbation of magnitude ΔT at ϕ0.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Meridional SST profile (K) used in aquaplanet cases with localized subtropical SST perturbation of magnitude ΔT at ϕ0.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Meridional SST profile (K) used in aquaplanet cases with localized subtropical SST perturbation of magnitude ΔT at ϕ0.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state results as a function of subtropical SST forcing for aquaplanet case. (top) Absolute global minimum circulation streamfunction strength (kg s−1). (bottom) Minimum 150-hPa absolute vorticity between 6° and 64°N.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state results as a function of subtropical SST forcing for aquaplanet case. (top) Absolute global minimum circulation streamfunction strength (kg s−1). (bottom) Minimum 150-hPa absolute vorticity between 6° and 64°N.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Steady-state results as a function of subtropical SST forcing for aquaplanet case. (top) Absolute global minimum circulation streamfunction strength (kg s−1). (bottom) Minimum 150-hPa absolute vorticity between 6° and 64°N.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state streamfunction for aquaplanet case, 100-day time mean, SST perturbation located at ϕ0 = 16°N. Solid contours denote counterclockwise flow; dashed contours indicate clockwise flow. Note that contour interval is 4 times greater for the figure on the right. (left) Subthreshold result for ΔT = 1.0 K; contour interval is 2.5 × 109 kg s−1. (right) Supercritical result for ΔT = 2.0 K; contour interval is 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state streamfunction for aquaplanet case, 100-day time mean, SST perturbation located at ϕ0 = 16°N. Solid contours denote counterclockwise flow; dashed contours indicate clockwise flow. Note that contour interval is 4 times greater for the figure on the right. (left) Subthreshold result for ΔT = 1.0 K; contour interval is 2.5 × 109 kg s−1. (right) Supercritical result for ΔT = 2.0 K; contour interval is 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Steady-state streamfunction for aquaplanet case, 100-day time mean, SST perturbation located at ϕ0 = 16°N. Solid contours denote counterclockwise flow; dashed contours indicate clockwise flow. Note that contour interval is 4 times greater for the figure on the right. (left) Subthreshold result for ΔT = 1.0 K; contour interval is 2.5 × 109 kg s−1. (right) Supercritical result for ΔT = 2.0 K; contour interval is 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state streamfunction, 100-day time mean, coastline located at 16°N. Solid contours denote counterclockwise flow; dashed contours indicate clockwise flow. (top left) Subcritical result for THF0 = l30 W m−2 with uniform SST, and contour interval 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (top right) Supercritical result for THF0 = 140 W m−2 with uniform SST, and contour interval 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (bottom left) Aquaplanet case with SST maximum at 8°N and contour interval 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1. (bottom right) Continental case with summer SST THF0 = 140 W m−2 and contour interval 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state streamfunction, 100-day time mean, coastline located at 16°N. Solid contours denote counterclockwise flow; dashed contours indicate clockwise flow. (top left) Subcritical result for THF0 = l30 W m−2 with uniform SST, and contour interval 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (top right) Supercritical result for THF0 = 140 W m−2 with uniform SST, and contour interval 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (bottom left) Aquaplanet case with SST maximum at 8°N and contour interval 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1. (bottom right) Continental case with summer SST THF0 = 140 W m−2 and contour interval 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Steady-state streamfunction, 100-day time mean, coastline located at 16°N. Solid contours denote counterclockwise flow; dashed contours indicate clockwise flow. (top left) Subcritical result for THF0 = l30 W m−2 with uniform SST, and contour interval 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (top right) Supercritical result for THF0 = 140 W m−2 with uniform SST, and contour interval 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (bottom left) Aquaplanet case with SST maximum at 8°N and contour interval 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1. (bottom right) Continental case with summer SST THF0 = 140 W m−2 and contour interval 1.0 × 1010 kg s−1.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Absolute global maximum steady-state streamfunction for aquaplanet case, 100-day time mean, SST perturbation at Northern Hemisphere latitude ϕ0.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Absolute global maximum steady-state streamfunction for aquaplanet case, 100-day time mean, SST perturbation at Northern Hemisphere latitude ϕ0.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Absolute global maximum steady-state streamfunction for aquaplanet case, 100-day time mean, SST perturbation at Northern Hemisphere latitude ϕ0.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state results as a function of land forcing strength. Continent with uniformly warm ocean is represented by solid lines with squares; continent with summer SST by dot–dash line with asterisks. (top) Absolute global minimum circulation streamfunction strength (kg s−1). (bottom) Minimum 150-hPa absolute vorticity between 6° and 64°N.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state results as a function of land forcing strength. Continent with uniformly warm ocean is represented by solid lines with squares; continent with summer SST by dot–dash line with asterisks. (top) Absolute global minimum circulation streamfunction strength (kg s−1). (bottom) Minimum 150-hPa absolute vorticity between 6° and 64°N.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Steady-state results as a function of land forcing strength. Continent with uniformly warm ocean is represented by solid lines with squares; continent with summer SST by dot–dash line with asterisks. (top) Absolute global minimum circulation streamfunction strength (kg s−1). (bottom) Minimum 150-hPa absolute vorticity between 6° and 64°N.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Location of maximum monsoon precipitation for steady monsoon as a function of land surface forcing strength (THF0). The coastline is at ϕL = 16°N and there is uniform warm SST.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Location of maximum monsoon precipitation for steady monsoon as a function of land surface forcing strength (THF0). The coastline is at ϕL = 16°N and there is uniform warm SST.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Location of maximum monsoon precipitation for steady monsoon as a function of land surface forcing strength (THF0). The coastline is at ϕL = 16°N and there is uniform warm SST.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Hovmoeller diagram of precipitation for seasonal cases, with contour interval of 2.0 mm day−1. (left) Maximum summer land forcing THF0 = 130 W m−2; (right) maximum summer land forcing THF0 = 150 W m−2. Day zero occurs at winter solstice; data are averaged over 4 yr of model integration.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Hovmoeller diagram of precipitation for seasonal cases, with contour interval of 2.0 mm day−1. (left) Maximum summer land forcing THF0 = 130 W m−2; (right) maximum summer land forcing THF0 = 150 W m−2. Day zero occurs at winter solstice; data are averaged over 4 yr of model integration.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Hovmoeller diagram of precipitation for seasonal cases, with contour interval of 2.0 mm day−1. (left) Maximum summer land forcing THF0 = 130 W m−2; (right) maximum summer land forcing THF0 = 150 W m−2. Day zero occurs at winter solstice; data are averaged over 4 yr of model integration.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Summer circulation for seasonal case with THF0 = 150 W m−2 and a contour interval of 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (left) Early summer circulation (day 175); (right) late summer circulation (day 250). Day zero occurs at winter solstice.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Summer circulation for seasonal case with THF0 = 150 W m−2 and a contour interval of 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (left) Early summer circulation (day 175); (right) late summer circulation (day 250). Day zero occurs at winter solstice.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Summer circulation for seasonal case with THF0 = 150 W m−2 and a contour interval of 5.0 × 109 kg s−1. (left) Early summer circulation (day 175); (right) late summer circulation (day 250). Day zero occurs at winter solstice.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state fields for continental case with THF0 = 140 W m−2 with uniform warm ocean. (top) Streamfunction, with a contour interval of 5.0 × 109 kg s−1, arrows indicate direction of flow; (center top) zonal wind, with a contour interval of 10 m s−1; (center bottom) precipitation (mm day−l); (bottom) 1000-mb moist static energy (104 J).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Steady-state fields for continental case with THF0 = 140 W m−2 with uniform warm ocean. (top) Streamfunction, with a contour interval of 5.0 × 109 kg s−1, arrows indicate direction of flow; (center top) zonal wind, with a contour interval of 10 m s−1; (center bottom) precipitation (mm day−l); (bottom) 1000-mb moist static energy (104 J).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Steady-state fields for continental case with THF0 = 140 W m−2 with uniform warm ocean. (top) Streamfunction, with a contour interval of 5.0 × 109 kg s−1, arrows indicate direction of flow; (center top) zonal wind, with a contour interval of 10 m s−1; (center bottom) precipitation (mm day−l); (bottom) 1000-mb moist static energy (104 J).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Schematic diagram of subcloud moist static energy. Dashed line shows radiative convective equilibrium hb; solid line shows hb in the presence of a large-scale circulation. As the surface forcing is increased, the radiative–convective equilibrium hb also increases over the land, but not over the adjacent ocean. Poleward-flowing air from the ocean requires greater heating to reach the RCE equilibrium hb, and the hb maximum shifts inland.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1

Schematic diagram of subcloud moist static energy. Dashed line shows radiative convective equilibrium hb; solid line shows hb in the presence of a large-scale circulation. As the surface forcing is increased, the radiative–convective equilibrium hb also increases over the land, but not over the adjacent ocean. Poleward-flowing air from the ocean requires greater heating to reach the RCE equilibrium hb, and the hb maximum shifts inland.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1
Schematic diagram of subcloud moist static energy. Dashed line shows radiative convective equilibrium hb; solid line shows hb in the presence of a large-scale circulation. As the surface forcing is increased, the radiative–convective equilibrium hb also increases over the land, but not over the adjacent ocean. Poleward-flowing air from the ocean requires greater heating to reach the RCE equilibrium hb, and the hb maximum shifts inland.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 5; 10.1175/JAS3916.1