The CarboEurope Regional Experiment Strategy

A. J. Dolman
Search for other papers by A. J. Dolman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Noilhan
Search for other papers by J. Noilhan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Durand
Search for other papers by P. Durand in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. Sarrat
Search for other papers by C. Sarrat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Brut
Search for other papers by A. Brut in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Piguet
Search for other papers by B. Piguet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Butet
Search for other papers by A. Butet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
N. Jarosz
Search for other papers by N. Jarosz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Y. Brunet
Search for other papers by Y. Brunet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Loustau
Search for other papers by D. Loustau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Lamaud
Search for other papers by E. Lamaud in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Tolk
Search for other papers by L. Tolk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Ronda
Search for other papers by R. Ronda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F. Miglietta
Search for other papers by F. Miglietta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Gioli
Search for other papers by B. Gioli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
V. Magliulo
Search for other papers by V. Magliulo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Esposito
Search for other papers by M. Esposito in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. Gerbig
Search for other papers by C. Gerbig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Körner
Search for other papers by S. Körner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Glademard
Search for other papers by P. Glademard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Ramonet
Search for other papers by M. Ramonet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Ciais
Search for other papers by P. Ciais in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. Neininger
Search for other papers by B. Neininger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. W. A. Hutjes
Search for other papers by R. W. A. Hutjes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. A. Elbers
Search for other papers by J. A. Elbers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Macatangay
Search for other papers by R. Macatangay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
O. Schrems
Search for other papers by O. Schrems in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. Pérez-Landa
Search for other papers by G. Pérez-Landa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. J. Sanz
Search for other papers by M. J. Sanz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Y. Scholz
Search for other papers by Y. Scholz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. Facon
Search for other papers by G. Facon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Ceschia
Search for other papers by E. Ceschia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
P. Beziat
Search for other papers by P. Beziat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

The Second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP-2) is an initiative to compare and evaluate 10-year simulations by a broad range of land surface models under controlled conditions. A major product of GSWP-2 is the first global gridded multimodel analysis of land surface state variables and fluxes for use by meteorologists, hydrologists, engineers, biogeochemists, agronomists, botanists, ecologists, geographers, climatologists, and educators. Simulations by 13 land models from five nations have gone into production of the analysis. The models are driven by forcing data derived from a combination of gridded atmospheric reanalyses and observations. The resulting analysis consists of multimodel means and standard deviations on the monthly time scale, including profiles of soil moisture and temperature at six levels, as well as daily and climatological (mean annual cycle) fields for over 50 land surface variables. The monthly standard deviations provide a measure of model agreement that may be used as a quality metric. An overview of key characteristics of the analysis is presented here, along with information on obtaining the data.

Department of Hydrology and Geoenvironmental Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Météo-France, CNRM/GMME, Toulouse, France

Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

SAFIRE, CNRS-INSU, Météo-France, ONES, Toulouse, France

INRA, EPHYSE, Bordeaux, France

CNR IBIMET, Florence, Italy

CNR ISAFoM, Napels, Italy

Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de I'Environnement, Gif sur Yvette, France

METAIR, Hausen am Albis, Switzerland

Alterra, Wageningen, Netherlands

University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

CEAM, Valencia, Spain

Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

CNES, Toulouse, France

CESBIO, Toulouse, France

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. A. J. Dolman, Department of Hydrology and Geoenvironmental Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands, E-mail: han.dolman@geo.falw.vu.nl

The Second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP-2) is an initiative to compare and evaluate 10-year simulations by a broad range of land surface models under controlled conditions. A major product of GSWP-2 is the first global gridded multimodel analysis of land surface state variables and fluxes for use by meteorologists, hydrologists, engineers, biogeochemists, agronomists, botanists, ecologists, geographers, climatologists, and educators. Simulations by 13 land models from five nations have gone into production of the analysis. The models are driven by forcing data derived from a combination of gridded atmospheric reanalyses and observations. The resulting analysis consists of multimodel means and standard deviations on the monthly time scale, including profiles of soil moisture and temperature at six levels, as well as daily and climatological (mean annual cycle) fields for over 50 land surface variables. The monthly standard deviations provide a measure of model agreement that may be used as a quality metric. An overview of key characteristics of the analysis is presented here, along with information on obtaining the data.

Department of Hydrology and Geoenvironmental Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Météo-France, CNRM/GMME, Toulouse, France

Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

SAFIRE, CNRS-INSU, Météo-France, ONES, Toulouse, France

INRA, EPHYSE, Bordeaux, France

CNR IBIMET, Florence, Italy

CNR ISAFoM, Napels, Italy

Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de I'Environnement, Gif sur Yvette, France

METAIR, Hausen am Albis, Switzerland

Alterra, Wageningen, Netherlands

University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

CEAM, Valencia, Spain

Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

CNES, Toulouse, France

CESBIO, Toulouse, France

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. A. J. Dolman, Department of Hydrology and Geoenvironmental Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands, E-mail: han.dolman@geo.falw.vu.nl
Save