THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS

Thomas C. Peterson
Search for other papers by Thomas C. Peterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
William M. Connolley
Search for other papers by William M. Connolley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
John Fleck
Search for other papers by John Fleck in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

British Antarctic Survey, National Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Albuquerque Journal, Albuquerque, New Mexico

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Thomas C. Peterson, NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28803, E-mail: Thomas.C.Peterson@noaa.gov

Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

British Antarctic Survey, National Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Albuquerque Journal, Albuquerque, New Mexico

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Thomas C. Peterson, NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28803, E-mail: Thomas.C.Peterson@noaa.gov
Save