Parisfog

Shedding new Light on Fog Physical Processes

M. Haeffelin
Search for other papers by M. Haeffelin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. Bergot
Search for other papers by T. Bergot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
T. Elias
Search for other papers by T. Elias in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Tardif
Search for other papers by R. Tardif in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Carrer
Search for other papers by D. Carrer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Chazette
Search for other papers by P. Chazette in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Colomb
Search for other papers by M. Colomb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Drobinski
Search for other papers by P. Drobinski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Dupont
Search for other papers by E. Dupont in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J.-C. Dupont
Search for other papers by J.-C. Dupont in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Gomes
Search for other papers by L. Gomes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Musson-Genon
Search for other papers by L. Musson-Genon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. Pietras
Search for other papers by C. Pietras in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Plana-Fattori
Search for other papers by A. Plana-Fattori in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Protat
Search for other papers by A. Protat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Rangognio
Search for other papers by J. Rangognio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J.-C. Raut
Search for other papers by J.-C. Raut in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Rémy
Search for other papers by S. Rémy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Richard
Search for other papers by D. Richard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. Sciare
Search for other papers by J. Sciare in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
X. Zhang
Search for other papers by X. Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Fog is a weather condition with significant socioeconomic impacts associated with increased hazards and constraints in road, maritime, and air traffic. While current numerical weather prediction models are able to forecast situations that are favorable to fog events, it is very difficult to determine the exact location and time of formation or dissipation. One-dimensional assimilation-forecast models have been implemented at a few airports and provide improved local predictions of fog events, but this approach is limited to specific locations. The occurrence, development, and dissipation of fog result from multiple processes (thermodynamical, radiative, dynamical, microphysical) that occur simultaneously, through a wide range of conditions, and that interact nonlinearly with each other. Hence, to advance our ability to forecast fog processes, we must gain a better understanding of how critical physical processes feed back on each other and improve their parametric representations in models. To provide a dataset suitable to study these processes simultaneously in continental fog, a suite of active and passive remote sensing instruments and in situ sensors was deployed at the Site Instrumental de Recherche en Télédétection Atmosphérique (SIRTA; instrumented site for atmospheric remote sensing research) observatory, near Paris, France, for 6 months (winter 2006/07) to monitor profiles of wind, turbulence, microphysical, and radiative properties as well as temperature, humidity, aerosol, and fog droplet microphysics and chemical composition in the surface layer. This field experiment, called ParisFog, provides a comprehensive characterization of over 100 fog and near-fog events. The ParisFog dataset contains contrasted events of stratus-lowering fog and radiative cooling fog as well as a large number of situations considered as favorable to fog formation but where fog droplets did not materialize. The effect of hydrated aerosols on visibility, the role of aerosols' microphysical and chemical properties on supersaturation and droplet activation, and the role of turbulence and sedimentation on fog life cycles have been investigated using the ParisFog dataset. The interactions between these processes, however, remain to be explored.

Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France

CNRM-GAME, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Palaiseau, France

Centre d'Enseignement et de Recherches en Environnement Atmosphérique (Laboratoire Commun ENPC—EDF R&D), Chatou, France

Laboratoire Régional des Ponts et Chaussées, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnment/IPSL, Saclay, France

Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales, Guyancourt, France

Institut Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Martial Haeffelin, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, LMD/IPSL, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, CEDEX, France, E-mail: martial.haeffelin@ipsl.polytechnique.fr

Fog is a weather condition with significant socioeconomic impacts associated with increased hazards and constraints in road, maritime, and air traffic. While current numerical weather prediction models are able to forecast situations that are favorable to fog events, it is very difficult to determine the exact location and time of formation or dissipation. One-dimensional assimilation-forecast models have been implemented at a few airports and provide improved local predictions of fog events, but this approach is limited to specific locations. The occurrence, development, and dissipation of fog result from multiple processes (thermodynamical, radiative, dynamical, microphysical) that occur simultaneously, through a wide range of conditions, and that interact nonlinearly with each other. Hence, to advance our ability to forecast fog processes, we must gain a better understanding of how critical physical processes feed back on each other and improve their parametric representations in models. To provide a dataset suitable to study these processes simultaneously in continental fog, a suite of active and passive remote sensing instruments and in situ sensors was deployed at the Site Instrumental de Recherche en Télédétection Atmosphérique (SIRTA; instrumented site for atmospheric remote sensing research) observatory, near Paris, France, for 6 months (winter 2006/07) to monitor profiles of wind, turbulence, microphysical, and radiative properties as well as temperature, humidity, aerosol, and fog droplet microphysics and chemical composition in the surface layer. This field experiment, called ParisFog, provides a comprehensive characterization of over 100 fog and near-fog events. The ParisFog dataset contains contrasted events of stratus-lowering fog and radiative cooling fog as well as a large number of situations considered as favorable to fog formation but where fog droplets did not materialize. The effect of hydrated aerosols on visibility, the role of aerosols' microphysical and chemical properties on supersaturation and droplet activation, and the role of turbulence and sedimentation on fog life cycles have been investigated using the ParisFog dataset. The interactions between these processes, however, remain to be explored.

Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France

CNRM-GAME, Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Palaiseau, France

Centre d'Enseignement et de Recherches en Environnement Atmosphérique (Laboratoire Commun ENPC—EDF R&D), Chatou, France

Laboratoire Régional des Ponts et Chaussées, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnment/IPSL, Saclay, France

Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales, Guyancourt, France

Institut Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Martial Haeffelin, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, LMD/IPSL, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, CEDEX, France, E-mail: martial.haeffelin@ipsl.polytechnique.fr
Save