Thanks to Anne Schindler for discussing the manuscript.
Bengtsson, L., S. Hagemann, and K. I. Hodges, 2004: Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data? J. Geophys. Res., 109, D11111, doi:10.1029/2004JD004536.
Christensen, J. H., F. Boberg, O. B. Christensen, and P. Lucas-Picher, 2008: On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20709, doi:10.1029/2008GL035694.
Coles, S., 2001: An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, 228 pp.
Das, T., A. Bardossy, E. Zehe, and Y. He, 2008: Comparison of conceptual model performance using different representations of spatial variability. J. Hydrol., 356, 106–118.
Eden, J., M. Widmann, D. Grawe, and S. Rast, 2012: Skill, correction, and downscaling of GCM-simulated precipitation. J. Climate, 25, 3970–3984.
Hay, L. E., and M. P. Clark, 2003: Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States. J. Hydrol., 282, 56–75.
Jacob, D., 2001: A note to the simulation of the annual and inter-annual variability of the water budget over the Baltic Sea drainage basin. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 77 (1–4), 61–73.
Kallache, M., M. Vrac, P. Naveau, and P.-A. Michelangeli, 2011: Nonstationary probabilistic downscaling of extreme precipitation. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05113, doi:10.1029/2010JD014892.
Maraun, D., 2012: Nonstationarities of regional climate model biases in European seasonal mean temperature and precipitation sums. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06706, doi:10.1029/2012GL051210.
Maraun, D., and Coauthors, 2010: Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev. Geophys., 48, RG3003, doi:10.1029/2009RG000314.
Piani, C., J. O. Haerter, and E. Coppola, 2010: Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 99 (1–2), 187–192.
Thorne, P. W., and R. S. Voss, 2010: Reanalysis suitable for characterizing long-term trends. Are they really achievable? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 353–361.
van der Linden, P., and J. F. B. Mitchell, 2009: ENSEMBLES: Climate change and its impacts: Summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project. Met Office Hadley Centre Tech. Rep., 160 pp.
Xu, C., 1999: From GCMs to river flow: A review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modelling approaches. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 23, 229.
The empirical equivalent of the marginal density distribution is the histogram of the observations.
Recent covariate-dependent quantile mapping may be applied with randomization (Kallache et al. 2011).
The variance correction can be seen as a special case.
The fact that the perfect boundary-driven RCMs do not capture the observed trends is likely because of the driving reanalysis data (Bengtsson et al. 2004; Thorne and Voss 2010). Repeating the analysis with the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Office (Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut; KNMI) Regional Atmospheric Climate Model, version 2 (RACMO2), yields similar results.