Analysis supported by NSF-AGS-0910737 and DOWs by NSF-AGS-0801041. We thank Curtis Alexander, Paul Robinson, and Rachel Humphrey.
Alexander, C., and Wurman J. , 2005: The 30 May 1998 Spencer, South Dakota, storm. Part I: The structural evolution and environment of the supercell tornadoes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 72–96.
Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather-map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor.,3, 396–409.
Bluestein, H. B., Lee W.-C. , Bell M. , Weiss C. C. , and Pazmany A. L. , 2003: Mobile Doppler radar observations of a tornado in a supercell near Bassett, Nebraska, on 5 June 1999. Part II: Tornado-vortex structure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2968–2984.
Bluestein, H. B., Weiss C. C. , and Pazmany A. L. , 2004: The vertical structure of a tornado: High-resolution, W-band, Doppler radar observations near Happy, Texas, on 5 May 2002. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2325–2337.
Church, C. R., Snow J. T. , Baker G. L. , and Agee E. M. , 1979: Characteristics of tornado-like vortices as a function of swirl ratio: A laboratory investigation. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1755–1776.
Davenport, A. G., Grimond C. S. B. , Oke T. R. , and Wieringa J. , 2000: Estimating the roughness of cities and sheltered country. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Applied Climatology, Asheville, NC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96–99.
Davies-Jones, R. P., Trapp R. J. , and Bluestein H. B. , 2001: Tornadoes and tornadic storms. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 167–221.
Dowell, D. C., Alexander C. R. , Wurman J. M. , and Wicker L. J. , 2005: Centrifuging of hydrometeors and debris in tornadoes: Radar-reflectivity patterns and wind-measurement errors. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 1501–1524.
Edwards, R., LaDue J. G. , Ferree J. T. , Scharfenberg K. , Maier C. , and Coulbourne W. L. , 2013: Tornado intensity estimation: Past, present, and future. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 641–653.
Hoecker, W. H., 1960: Wind speed and air flow patterns in the Dallas tornado of April 2, 1957. Mon. Wea. Rev.,88, 167–180.
Kessler, E., 1986: Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics. Vol. 2, Thunderstorms: A Social, Scientific, and Technological Documentary, University of Oklahoma Press, 432 pp.
Koch, S. E., desJardins M. , and Kocin P. J. , 1983: An interactive Barnes objective map analysis scheme for use with satellite and conventional data. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 1487–1503.
Kosiba, K. A., and Wurman J. , 2010: The three-dimensional axisymmetric wind field structure of the Spencer, South Dakota, 1998, tornado. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3074–3083.
Kosiba, K. A., Trapp R. J. , and Wurman J. , 2008: An analysis of the axisymmetric three-dimensional low-level wind field in a tornado using mobile radar observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L05805, doi:10.1029/2007GL031851.
Kosiba, K. A., Wurman J. , Markowski P. , Richardson Y. , Robinson P. , and Marquis J. , 2013: Genesis of the Goshen County, Wyoming, tornado on 5 June 2009 during VORTEX2. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 1157–1181.
Lee, W.-C., and Wurman J. , 2005: Diagnosed three-dimensional axisymmetric structure of the Mulhall tornado on 3 May 1999. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2373–2393.
Lee, W.-C., Jou B. J.-D. , Chang P.-L. , and Deng S.-M. , 1999: Tropical cyclone kinematic structure retrieved from single-Doppler radar observations. Part I: Doppler velocity patterns and the GBVTD technique. Mon. Wea. Rev.,127, 2419–2439.
Lewellen, D. C., Lewellen W. S. , and Xia J. , 2000: The influence of a local swirl ratio on tornado intensification near the surface. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 527–544.
Lewellen, D. C., Gong B. , and Lewellen W. S. , 2008: Effects of finescale debris on near-surface tornado dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 3247–3262.
Lewellen, W. S., 1976: Assessment of knowledge and implications for man. Proc. Symp. on Tornadoes, Lubbock, TX, Texas Tech University, 107–143.
Lewellen, W. S., 1993: Tornado vortex theory. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 19–39.
Lewellen, W. S., Lewellen D. C. , and Sykes R. I. , 1997: Large-eddy simulation of a tornado's interaction with the surface. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 581–605.
Nolan, D. S., 2013: On the use of Doppler radar–derived wind fields to diagnose the secondary circulations of tornadoes. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1160–1171.
Tanamachi, R. L., Bluestein H. B. , Lee W.-C. , Bell M. , and Pazmany A. , 2007: Ground-based velocity display (GBVTD) analysis of W-band Doppler radar data in a tornado near Stockton, Kansas, on 15 May 1999. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 783–800.
Wakimoto, R. M., Stauffer P. , Lee W.-C. , Atkins N. T. , and Wurman J. , 2012: Finescale structure of the LaGrange, Wyoming, tornado during VORTEX2: GBVTD and photogrammetric analyses. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2939–2958.
Wurman, J., 1998: Preliminary results and report of the ROTATE-98 tornado experiment. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 120–123.
Wurman, J., 2001: The DOW mobile multiple Doppler network. Preprints, 30th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Munich, Germany, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95–97.
Wurman, J., 2008: Preliminary results and report of the ROTATE-2008 radar/in-situ/mobile mesonet experiment. Proc. 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 5.4. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/24SLS/webprogram/Paper142200.html.]
Wurman, J., and Randall M. , 2001: An inexpensive, mobile, rapid-scan radar. Preprints, 30th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Munich, Germany, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P3.4. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/21577.pdf.]
Wurman, J., and Kosiba K. , 2013: Finescale radar observations of tornado and mesocyclone structures. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 1157–1174.
Wurman, J., Straka J. , Rasmussen E. , Randall M. , and Zahrai A. , 1997: Design and deployment of a portable, pencil-beam, pulsed, 3-cm Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 14, 1502–1512.
Wurman, J., Alexander C. , Robinson P. , and Richardson Y. , 2007a: Low-level winds in tornadoes and potential catastrophic tornado impacts in urban areas. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 31–46.
Wurman, J., Richardson Y. , Alexander C. , Weygandt S. , and Zhang P. F. , 2007b: Dual-Doppler analysis of winds and vorticity budget terms near a tornado. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 2392–2405.
Wurman, J., Dowell D. , Richardson Y. , Markowski P. , Rasmussen E. , Burgess D. , Wicker L. , and Bluestein H. B. , 2012: The Second Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment: VORTEX2. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 1147–1170.
Wurman, J., Kosiba K. , and Robinson P. , 2013a: In situ, Doppler radar, and video observations of the interior structure of a tornado and the wind–damage relationship. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 835–846.
DOWs have 3-dB beamwidths of ~0.9°, oversampled at 0.3°–0.4°, gating at 25 m (RSDOW) and 30 m (DOW7).
P1 crew discovered the resident ~100 s after the event, sitting on the rubble of the transported/destroyed house, suffering from lacerations and a broken collarbone; the crew assisted in her extraction.
The National Weather Service (NWS) rated the tornado EF2.
P1 hosts an R. M. Young 5103 propeller-type anemometer.
Reported DOW observations height adjusted +3 m, accounting for antenna height AGL.
RSDOW data were objectively analyzed onto a Cartesian grid using a Barnes scheme (Barnes 1964), grid spacing (radius of influence) of 5 (10) m and 2 (3) m in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. Tornado translational motion was subtracted from Vd. Tornado centers were vertically aligned, eliminating tilting errors, but not correcting for flow asymmetries. Vertical winds (w) were derived by the upward integration of the continuity equation, assuming w(z = 0) = 0 m s−1 and free slip.
Errors in vortex center location were <7 m.
It is likely that Vg > Vd because Vd only captures the component of motion toward–away from the radar.
P1 drove into the western side of the tornado after the tornado center had moved east of the road.
P1 is visible as moving ground clutter in the lowest RSDOW sweeps.
Radar measurements are instantaneous and represent reflectivity-weighted averages of scatterer (rain/debris, with associated terminal/centrifuging velocities) motion, usually determined using pulse-pair or spectrally based signal processing techniques, over spatial volumes not equal to 3-s air parcel trajectories.
Since the observations were close to the surface, dirt, gravel, and/or grass likely were appreciable scatter types in the radar sample volumes. The in situ P1 crew did not report airborne debris hitting their vehicle.
The surface roughness length was approximated as 0.1 m, characteristic of “openly rough” terrain (Davenport et al. 2000).
Here, Sc = rcΓ∞/ϒ, where rc is a characteristic radius of Vt(max), Γ∞ is the ambient angular momentum, and ϒ is the depleted angular momentum flux in the surface layer.
Note that So characterizes the flow in which the tornado forms. Both So and Sc are difficult to define in nature since flow parameters are not easily defined. In addition, So cannot be approximated in the current study since the analysis domain is too small to define the large-scale flow in which the tornado is embedded.
Assuming rc = 60 m, Γ∞ = 3.0 × 103 m2 s−1, and ϒ = 1.0 × 103 m5 s−2.
Values of parameters composing Sc are uncertain, but reasonable choices yield Sc ≫ 1.